AFL
Price
$86.11
Change
+$0.46 (+0.54%)
Updated
Mar 28, 1:54 PM EST
34 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$74.11
Change
+$0.17 (+0.23%)
Updated
Mar 28, 6:59 PM EST
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions AFL vs MET

Header iconAFL vs MET Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs METBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$86.11
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
Volume$924
CapitalizationN/A
MetLife
Price$74.11
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
Volume$461.12K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL vs MET Comparison Chart

Loading...

AFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
METDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
AFL vs. MET commentary
Mar 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and MET is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 28, 2024
Stock price -- (AFL: $85.86 vs. MET: $74.11)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 19% vs. MET: 13%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.27B vs. MET: $53.45B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.27B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $21.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2024.

MET is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.01% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for AFL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MET with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.4B) has a higher market cap than AFL($49.3B). MET has higher P/E ratio than AFL: MET (40.84) vs AFL (11.01). MET YTD gains are higher at: 12.668 vs. AFL (4.440). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. AFL (77.6B). AFL has less debt than MET: AFL (7.36B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than AFL: MET (66.4B) vs AFL (18.8B).
AFLMETAFL / MET
Capitalization49.3B53.4B92%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.44012.66835%
P/E Ratio11.0140.8427%
Revenue18.8B66.4B28%
Total Cash77.6B308B25%
Total Debt7.36B18.8B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1820
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2722
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (50) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (57). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (20). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (27). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

MET's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (50). This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
METDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFG86.071.58
+1.87%
Principal Financial Group
GRNT6.280.08
+1.29%
Granite Ridge Resources
ARCB137.271.08
+0.79%
ArcBest Corp
MBCN23.900.17
+0.72%
Middlefield Banc Corp
TOMZ0.67-0.06
-8.82%
TOMI Environmental Solutions

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
+0.79%
CNO - AFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
MET - AFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
PRU - AFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
GL - AFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
PRI - AFL
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
More