Compare predictions ENSV vs MXC
Loading...
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMXC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ENSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MXC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENSV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ENSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ENSV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while MXC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
ENSV is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.
MXC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.97% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
@Oil & Gas Production (+0.06% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| ENSV | MXC | ENSV / MXC | |
| Capitalization | 5.38M | 20.9M | 26% |
| EBITDA | -2.53M | 4.3M | -59% |
| Gain YTD | 3.770 | 42.497 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.10 | 12.85 | 9% |
| Revenue | 22.1M | 7.01M | 315% |
| Total Cash | 300K | 3.58M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 8M | 33.6K | 23,807% |
ENSV | MXC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ENSV's Valuation (55) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MXC (72). This means that ENSV’s stock grew similarly to MXC’s over the last 12 months.
MXC's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENSV (100). This means that MXC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENSV’s over the last 12 months.
MXC's SMR Rating (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENSV (100). This means that MXC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENSV’s over the last 12 months.
ENSV's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MXC (42). This means that ENSV’s stock grew similarly to MXC’s over the last 12 months.
MXC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for ENSV (99). This means that MXC’s stock grew significantly faster than ENSV’s over the last 12 months.
| ENSV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
ENSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENSV has been loosely correlated with WTTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENSV jumps, then WTTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSV | 100% | -7.76% | ||
| WTTR - ENSV | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| WHD - ENSV | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| SLB - ENSV | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| NESR - ENSV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CHX - ENSV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
MXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXC has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXC jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXC | 100% | +2.12% | ||
| HUSA - MXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -8.24% | ||
| CEI - MXC | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.65% | ||
| INDO - MXC | 42% Loosely correlated | +7.65% | ||
| VTLE - MXC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| PR - MXC | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||