Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HNRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HNRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HNRG (@Coal) experienced а -2.25% price change this week, while NC (@Coal) price change was +3.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.48%.
HNRG is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2024.
NC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2024.
Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
HNRG | NC | HNRG / NC | |
Capitalization | 176M | 224M | 79% |
EBITDA | 127M | -32.31M | -393% |
Gain YTD | -41.063 | -17.543 | 234% |
P/E Ratio | 4.03 | 13.60 | 30% |
Revenue | 634M | 215M | 295% |
Total Cash | 2.84M | 85.1M | 3% |
Total Debt | 119M | 44.7M | 266% |
HNRG | NC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NC's Valuation (38) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNRG (76) in the Coal industry. This means that NC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Coal industry is in the same range as NC (100) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew similarly to NC’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG's SMR Rating (49) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NC (93) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NC’s over the last 12 months.
NC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNRG (91) in the Coal industry. This means that NC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
NC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is significantly better than the same rating for HNRG (97) in the Coal industry. This means that NC’s stock grew significantly faster than HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG | NC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 9 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNRG has been loosely correlated with BTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNRG jumps, then BTU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HNRG | 100% | +3.37% | ||
BTU - HNRG | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
ARCH - HNRG | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
CEIX - HNRG | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
ARLP - HNRG | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
HCC - HNRG | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.37% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NC has been loosely correlated with ARLP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NC jumps, then ARLP could also see price increases.