Analysis and predictions CALF vs NTGR
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CALF is a Hold and NTGR is a Hold.
NTGR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CALF | NTGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AUIIX | 32.00 | 0.14 | +0.44% |
| AB Equity Income I | |||
| BERCX | 17.57 | 0.04 | +0.23% |
| Carillon Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund | |||
| KTCSX | 36.23 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| DWS Science and Technology S | |||
| VSOIX | 47.91 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp I | |||
| BRSIX | 11.07 | -0.05 | -0.45% |
| Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market | |||
CALF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CALF has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CALF jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CALF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| UFPI - CALF | 80% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| M - CALF | 76% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| CVCO - CALF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| TPH - CALF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| BCC - CALF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
NTGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTGR has been loosely correlated with PI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTGR jumps, then PI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTGR | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| PI - NTGR | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| INFN - NTGR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| VIAV - NTGR | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| UI - NTGR | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| ZBRA - NTGR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||