Compare trend and price HLF vs OMI
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLF is a StrongBuy and OMI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- OMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- OMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +12.55% price change this week, while OMI (@Medical Distributors) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.
OMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.60% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Medical Distributors (-1.53% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
| HLF | OMI | HLF / OMI | |
| Capitalization | 1B | 2.11B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 482M | 391M | 123% |
| Gain YTD | -39.712 | 32.693 | -121% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.42 | 64.10 | 10% |
| Revenue | 5.06B | 10.3B | 49% |
| Total Cash | 575M | 243M | 237% |
| Total Debt | 2.77B | 2.32B | 119% |
HLF | OMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 14 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMI's Valuation (45) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as HLF (58) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
OMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMI (91) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than OMI’s over the last 12 months.
OMI's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (82) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
OMI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as HLF (23) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
| HLF | OMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIEIX | 25.11 | 0.22 | +0.88% |
| Principal Glb Emerging Markets Inst | |||
| INDCX | 11.62 | 0.02 | +0.17% |
| Pioneer Disciplined Growth C | |||
| SFMRX | 36.23 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R6 | |||
| WFMIX | 48.15 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Inst | |||
| PSPFX | 3.96 | -0.01 | -0.25% |
| US Global Investors Global Res | |||
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with CENTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then CENTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| CENTA - HLF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| BGS - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| DAR - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||