Ad is loading...
ONEO vs SCHM
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts ONEO vs SCHM
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Price$108.58
Change-$1.40 (-1.27%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets82.48M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$24.62
Change+$0.32 (+1.32%)
Volume$323
Net Assets10.23B
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEO vs. SCHM commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEO is a Buy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 10.2B vs. ONEO (82.5M). ONEO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: ONEO (-8.254) vs SCHM (-12.054). ONEO was incepted earlier than SCHM: ONEO (9 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than ONEO (0.20). ONEO has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| ONEO | SCHM | ONEO / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | -8.254 | -12.054 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 10.2B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.04 | 500% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 13.00 | 385% |
| Yield | 1.41 | 1.48 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||