Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONEO vs SCHM
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts ONEO vs SCHM
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Price$124.23
Change-$0.41 (-0.33%)
Volume$100
Net Assets93.48M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
Volume$5.22K
Net Assets11.71B
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEO vs. SCHM commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEO is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.7B vs. ONEO (93.5M). ONEO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: ONEO (5.633) vs SCHM (3.340). ONEO was incepted earlier than SCHM: ONEO (10 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than ONEO (0.20). ONEO has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| ONEO | SCHM | ONEO / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.633 | 3.340 | 169% |
| Net Assets | 93.5M | 11.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.04 | 500% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 13.00 | 385% |
| Yield | 1.35 | 1.41 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEO | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
More | ||||