QQQM
Price
$251.23
Change
+$1.69 (+0.68%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
72.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VUG
Price
$459.52
Change
+$2.62 (+0.57%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
317.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQQM vs VUG

Header iconQQQM vs VUG Comparison
Open Charts QQQM vs VUGBanner chart's image
QQQM vs VUG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) vs. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)

Key Takeaways

  • QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index with 103 holdings and a 0.15% expense ratio, delivering concentrated exposure to non-financial Nasdaq leaders, while VUG follows the broader CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index with 151 holdings at a lower 0.03% expense ratio for greater diversification.
  • Both ETFs maintain heavy technology sector weightings—QQQM at approximately 60%, VUG at 51-66%—but VUG offers more balanced allocations including industrials (7.4%) and financials (2.3%), mitigating single-stock risks compared to QQQM's top 10 holdings comprising about 47% of assets.
  • QQQM excludes financials per its index methodology, emphasizing innovation-driven mega-caps like NVDA (8.8%) and AAPL (7.5%), while VUG includes broader growth names such as LLY (2.7%).
  • VUG's ultra-low costs and lower concentration enhance long-term efficiency, suiting conservative growth investors, whereas QQQM's Nasdaq focus provides higher beta exposure to tech momentum.
  • Both exhibit similar volatility profiles (standard deviation around 22%), but QQQM has shown relative resilience in recent tech-led cycles due to its pure-play innovation tilt.
  • Quarterly rebalancing in QQQM contrasts with VUG's low 11% turnover, influencing responsiveness to sector shifts.

Introduction

QQQM and VUG represent compelling options for investors seeking large-cap growth exposure amid persistent innovation themes like artificial intelligence and cloud computing. QQQM offers targeted access to the NASDAQ-100's non-financial giants, while VUG provides broader U.S. large-cap growth coverage. These ETFs compete indirectly, appealing to those targeting capital appreciation from technology-heavy portfolios. In the current environment of AI-driven capital expenditures, sector rotations, and moderating interest rates, their structural differences in concentration, costs, and diversification help investors navigate volatility while positioning for sustained growth trends.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Overview

The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the NASDAQ-100 Index, comprising 100 of the largest domestic and international non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Launched in 2020, it holds 103 securities with top weights in NVDA (8.8%), AAPL (7.5%), MSFT (5.9%), AMZN (4.4%), and TSLA (4.0%), where the top 10 account for roughly 47% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize technology (60%), consumer discretionary (21%), and health care (5%), reflecting a non-diversified structure focused on innovation leaders. The expense ratio is 0.15%, with quarterly rebalancing and annual reconstitution ensuring alignment with dynamic Nasdaq listings. QQQM's $71B AUM supports strong liquidity, making it ideal for investors prioritizing mega-cap growth without financial sector overlap.

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) Overview

The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) passively tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, targeting growth stocks within the large-cap U.S. market since its 2004 inception. It features 151 holdings, led by NVDA (13.2%), AAPL (11.5%), MSFT (9.6%), GOOGL (5.9%), and AMZN (4.8%), with top 10 comprising about 65%. Sectors tilt toward technology (51-66%), consumer discretionary (13-16%), industrials (4-7%), and health care (5-6%), offering broader exposure including minor financials (2-5%). With an ultra-low 0.03% expense ratio and 11% turnover, VUG employs full replication for precise tracking, backed by $350B AUM for excellent liquidity. Its structure suits long-term holders seeking diversified growth with minimal costs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth sector, dominated by technology and AI enablers, faces a dynamic environment shaped by massive capital expenditures exceeding $500B annually for AI infrastructure, powering hyperscaler investments in semiconductors, cloud, and data centers. Capital flows heavily favor tech amid earnings acceleration, though regulatory scrutiny on monopolies and power constraints pose risks. Macro drivers like moderating rates support valuations, while geopolitical tensions and supply chain shifts influence industrials and consumer discretionary. Sector rotations toward AI adopters beyond mega-caps, coupled with energy demands for data centers, underscore opportunities and volatility in this high-growth arena.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, QQQM has demonstrated relative outperformance over VUG, with shallower YTD declines (-1% vs. -5%) and stronger one-year returns, driven by its concentrated Nasdaq exposure amid AI momentum in holdings like NVDA and MSFT. VUG's broader diversification tempers gains in tech rallies but provides stability during rotations. Both share comparable long-term annualized returns (26-28% over three years), with similar volatility (standard deviation ~22%, beta 1.15-1.21). QQQM's positioning excels in earnings-driven tech cycles and capex trends, while VUG's lower concentration aids resilience amid interest rate shifts and sector breadth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots analyzing thousands of tickers across diverse timeframes, strategies like trend-following or mean reversion, and performance metrics including win rates and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility, sector momentum, or macroeconomic shifts. Explore these bots to enhance decision-making with data-driven signals tailored to ETFs like QQQM and VUG.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors QQQM for its structural alignment with Nasdaq innovation leaders, cost efficiency relative to peers, concentrated trend consistency in AI-driven cycles, and superior recent relative positioning despite higher volatility. VUG's diversification and lower fees offer appeal for balanced exposure, but QQQM edges out with ~60% probability in momentum-favorable environments based on sector momentum and holdings overlap.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QQQM vs. VUG commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQQM is a Buy and VUG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VUG has more net assets: 318B vs. QQQM (72.6B). QQQM has a higher annual dividend yield than VUG: QQQM (-0.532) vs VUG (-5.809). QQQM was incepted earlier than VUG: QQQM (5 years) vs VUG (22 years). VUG (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than QQQM (0.15). VUG has a higher turnover QQQM (6.00) vs QQQM (6.00).
QQQMVUGQQQM / VUG
Gain YTD-0.532-5.8099%
Net Assets72.6B318B23%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.03500%
Turnover6.0012.0050%
Yield0.530.46117%
Fund Existence5 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQQMVUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QQQM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VUG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPE18.040.06
+0.33%
First Trust Preferred Sec & Inc ETF
SMBS25.610.02
+0.08%
Schwab® Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
IBUY64.70-0.10
-0.15%
Amplify Online Retail ETF
ESMV28.73-0.05
-0.18%
iShares ESG Optd MSCI USA Min Vol FacETF
SDS68.86-0.79
-1.13%
ProShares UltraShort S&P500

QQQM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQM has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQM jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQQM
1D Price
Change %
QQQM100%
+0.68%
NVDA - QQQM
83%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
LRCX - QQQM
77%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
ADI - QQQM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
AMZN - QQQM
74%
Closely correlated
+5.60%
AVGO - QQQM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
More

VUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VUG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VUG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VUG
1D Price
Change %
VUG100%
+0.57%
NVDA - VUG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
AMZN - VUG
75%
Closely correlated
+5.60%
IBKR - VUG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
AAPL - VUG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
AVGO - VUG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
More