Advertisement
RBGLY vs UL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Reckitt Benckiser (RBGLY) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both RBGLY and UL operate in the consumer defensive household and personal products sector, offering stability amid market volatility.
- RBGLY trades at a lower price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 10.42 compared to UL's 19.00, suggesting better value on earnings multiples.
- RBGLY shows a higher dividend yield at 4.05% versus UL's 3.83%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Year-to-date (YTD) performance favors RBGLY at +12.95% over UL's +10.70%.
- UL demonstrates stronger recent catalysts through portfolio reshaping and acquisitions, enhancing growth prospects.
- UL's larger market cap of $126.6B provides greater liquidity than RBGLY's $44.5B.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines RBGLY (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and UL (Unilever PLC), two giants in the consumer defensive sector specializing in household and personal care products. Both companies benefit from resilient demand for essential goods, making them attractive for defensive investors seeking stability during economic uncertainty. Traders interested in relative performance, valuation metrics, and sector momentum will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories, dividend profiles, and market positioning in the current environment.
RBGLY Overview and Recent Performance
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY), trading as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), focuses on health, hygiene, and nutrition products including brands like Lysol and Finish. In recent market activity, the stock has navigated mixed analyst sentiment, with some upgrades amid concerns over earnings foundations. Priced around $13.86 within a 52-week range of $12.74–$17.80, it reflects year-to-date gains of 12.95%. Influences include portfolio adjustments and emerging market growth, though recent weeks have seen pressure from broader consumer staples rotation and valuation debates, contributing to moderated momentum.
UL Overview and Recent Performance
Unilever PLC (UL) is a global leader in consumer goods, offering brands such as Dove and producing household, personal care, and food items. Recent weeks have highlighted strategic moves like the McCormick deal for premium assets and acquisition of supplements firm Grüns, alongside launches in premium beauty. Trading near $57.96 in a 52-week range of $54.95–$74.98, it posted YTD returns of 10.70%. Sentiment has shifted positively on portfolio reshaping toward high-growth areas, though shares remain below recent highs amid market rotations in defensive names.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of over 351 available, each designed for diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and dip buying across thousands of tickers. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates between 53.91% and 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Trading 1 to 25 tickers with timeframes from 1 day to 55 days, they incorporate AI/ML for real-time signals, risk management via take-profit/stop-loss corridors, and multi-agent approaches. Ideal for volatile markets, these bots adapt to sectors like semiconductors and consumer goods. Explore the page to identify bots suited to your trading style and current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Reckitt Benckiser (RBGLY) and Unilever (UL) share overlapping business models in household and personal products but differ in scale and strategy. RBGLY emphasizes hygiene brands with a leaner portfolio, driving efficiency but exposing it to nutrition segment risks. UL boasts broader diversification, including recent M&A (mergers and acquisitions) to bolster premium beauty and flavor categories. Growth drivers favor UL's emerging market exposure and reinvestments, while RBGLY offers superior valuation and yield. Recent momentum tilts toward UL on catalysts, but RBGLY shows relative outperformance YTD. Risks include commodity inflation for both, with RBGLY facing higher earnings volatility and UL potential integration challenges. Market sentiment leans stable for UL due to size.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward UL based on trend consistency, recent catalysts like portfolio optimization, and superior liquidity in the consumer defensive space. While RBGLY presents compelling value via lower PE and higher yield, UL's scale and growth initiatives position it favorably for near-term relative outperformance, though both warrant monitoring amid sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBGLY is a Hold and UL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RBGLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RBGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RBGLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RBGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RBGLY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.76%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.00% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| RBGLY | UL | RBGLY / UL | |
| Capitalization | 55.8B | 128B | 44% |
| EBITDA | 2.77B | 11.3B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -18.618 | -10.022 | 186% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.57 | 19.20 | 175% |
| Revenue | 14B | 59.8B | 23% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
RBGLY | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBGLY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as UL (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as RBGLY (100) in the null industry. This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.
RBGLY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as UL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
UL's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as RBGLY (64) in the null industry. This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.
RBGLY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (75) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that RBGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
| RBGLY | UL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 31% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 34% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 47% | 10 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
RBGLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBGLY has been loosely correlated with UL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBGLY jumps, then UL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBGLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBGLY | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| UL - RBGLY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| CL - RBGLY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| PG - RBGLY | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| CHD - RBGLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| CLX - RBGLY | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
UL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.