SCHB
Price
$27.41
Change
-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$127.63
Change
-$0.67 (-0.52%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
15.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHB vs SPMO

Header iconSCHB vs SPMO Comparison
Open Charts SCHB vs SPMOBanner chart's image
SCHB vs SPMO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) vs. Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHB offers broad diversification across ~2,400 U.S. stocks spanning large-, mid-, and small-caps, while SPMO concentrates on ~100 high-momentum S&P 500 constituents for targeted exposure.
  • Both ETFs exhibit heavy technology weighting (~31-32%), but SPMO overweights financials (20%) and industrials (13%) compared to SCHB's more balanced financial services (12%) and industrials (10%).
  • SCHB's ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03% enhances long-term cost efficiency versus SPMO's 0.13%, appealing to buy-and-hold investors.
  • SPMO demonstrates stronger returns in momentum-driven market cycles but with higher volatility; SCHB provides greater stability through extensive diversification.
  • SCHB suits core portfolio allocation with low turnover (3%), while SPMO's semi-annual rebalancing captures short-term trends at the risk of whipsaw effects.
  • Recent sector rotation away from pure tech momentum favors SCHB's broader exposure in the current environment.

Introduction

In an era of sector rotation and shifting market leadership, comparing SCHB and SPMO highlights the trade-off between comprehensive U.S. equity exposure and momentum-enhanced large-cap strategies. SCHB delivers total market replication, ideal for diversified, low-cost core holdings, while SPMO targets S&P 500 leaders by momentum score, aiming to outperform in trending environments. These ETFs appeal to investors navigating interest rate dynamics, earnings cycles, and broadening market participation beyond mega-cap tech. As capital flows emphasize value and cyclical sectors amid moderating growth expectations, this ETF comparison evaluates structural differences, sector profiles, and relative positioning for informed allocation decisions.

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) is a passive fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, encompassing the largest ~2,500 U.S. companies across market caps. With approximately 2,408 holdings, it provides extensive diversification, minimizing single-stock risk. Top holdings include NVDA (6.89%), AAPL (5.78%), MSFT (4.60%), AMZN (3.19%), and GOOGL (2.75%), comprising about 33% of assets. Sector allocations feature technology (32%), financial services (12%), consumer cyclical (10%), healthcare (10%), and communication services (10%). The expense ratio is a competitive 0.03%, with low portfolio turnover of 3.12% supporting tax efficiency. High liquidity and $38B AUM underscore its role as a stable, broad-market benchmark.

Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) passively replicates the S&P 500 Momentum Index, selecting ~100 S&P 500 stocks with the highest volatility-adjusted momentum scores, weighted by market cap and momentum. Holding around 100 securities, it offers concentrated large-cap exposure. Top holdings are NVDA (9.29%), AVGO (9.22%), META (7.50%), JPM (5.00%), and PLTR (4.07%), accounting for over 50% of assets. Sectors include information technology (32%), financials (20%), communication services (14%), industrials (13%), and consumer staples (7%). The expense ratio is 0.13%, with semi-annual rebalancing on the third Fridays of March and September. Managing $13B AUM, SPMO targets performance in upward trends but carries elevated concentration risk.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market faces evolving dynamics, with sector rotation accelerating in recent months amid cooling AI hype, persistent inflation concerns, and expectations of steady interest rates. Technology's dominance wanes as investors pivot to financials, industrials, and defensives like consumer staples and utilities, driven by earnings resilience and undervaluation. Macro catalysts include fiscal policy shifts, commodity price fluctuations, and geopolitical tensions influencing energy and materials. Momentum strategies like SPMO thrive in concentrated rallies but falter during rotations, while broad indices like SCHB capture diversified flows. Regulatory scrutiny on mega-caps and capital rotation to small-caps add volatility, emphasizing the need for balanced exposure amid broadening market participation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPMO has outperformed SCHB during momentum surges, delivering superior returns over multi-year periods like 3- and 5-years annualized, fueled by tech and financial leaders. However, SPMO's higher volatility (e.g., 16% 1-year vs. SCHB's 11%) exposes it to drawdowns in reversals. SCHB's broad diversification yields steadier results, mirroring total market trends with lower beta. Recent weeks reflect sector rotation, where SCHB benefits from gains in cyclicals and small-caps, narrowing the gap as tech momentum cools. SPMO's concentration amplifies upside in earnings-driven rallies but heightens risk amid interest rate uncertainty and geopolitical shifts, positioning SCHB for relative stability in rotational environments.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots analyzing thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and scalping, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, adapting to volatility, trends, and sector shifts. Investors can explore bots tailored to ETFs like SCHB or SPMO, enabling data-backed signals. Visit the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHB with moderate conviction (~60% probability of relative outperformance over the next cycle). SCHB's superior diversification, rock-bottom costs, and low volatility align with ongoing sector rotation and momentum deceleration, offering resilient exposure across market caps. While SPMO excels in strong trends, its concentration and higher fees elevate risks in choppy conditions; SCHB better matches the structural shift toward broader participation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHB vs. SPMO commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHB is a Hold and SPMO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHB has more net assets: 40.5B vs. SPMO (15.3B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHB: SPMO (7.276) vs SCHB (4.747). SCHB was incepted earlier than SPMO: SCHB (16 years) vs SPMO (11 years). SCHB (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover SCHB (3.00) vs SCHB (3.00).
SCHBSPMOSCHB / SPMO
Gain YTD4.7477.27665%
Net Assets40.5B15.3B265%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.1323%
Turnover3.0044.007%
Yield1.180.91130%
Fund Existence16 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHBSPMO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIPS11.970.02
+0.17%
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
EDV64.710.02
+0.03%
Vanguard Extended Duration Trs ETF
ERNZ21.32N/A
N/A
TRUESHARES ACTIVE YIELD ETF
DFVX79.36-0.22
-0.28%
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
BZQ8.47-0.05
-0.59%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped

SCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHB has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHB jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHB
1D Price
Change %
SCHB100%
-0.11%
AVGO - SCHB
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
AAPL - SCHB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
MSFT - SCHB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
AMZN - SCHB
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
META - SCHB
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
More