SCHX
Price
$27.96
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
67.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$127.64
Change
-$0.66 (-0.51%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
15.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHX vs SPMO

Header iconSCHX vs SPMO Comparison
Open Charts SCHX vs SPMOBanner chart's image
SCHX vs SPMO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) vs. Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHX offers broad exposure to approximately 750 large-cap U.S. stocks via a market-cap-weighted index, providing high diversification at a low expense ratio of 0.03%.
  • SPMO targets ~100 high-momentum S&P 500 stocks, resulting in more concentrated exposure with heavier weighting toward technology (32%) and financials (20%), and a higher expense ratio of 0.13%.
  • SCHX exhibits lower volatility due to its broad holdings, while SPMO's momentum strategy amplifies returns in trending markets but increases risk during rotations.
  • Both funds overlap in mega-cap tech leaders like NVDA and AVGO, but SPMO concentrates more in top performers.
  • SCHX suits core portfolio stability; SPMO appeals for tactical tilts toward sector momentum and growth cycles.
  • Cost efficiency favors SCHX for long-term holding, while SPMO's factor tilt drives outperformance in recent market uptrends.

Introduction

In the current market environment, characterized by sector rotation between technology leaders and value-oriented financials amid shifting interest rate expectations, comparing SCHX and SPMO highlights key trade-offs in U.S. large-cap exposure. SCHX delivers comprehensive market-cap-weighted access to the broad large-cap universe, serving as a low-cost core holding for diversified equity allocation. SPMO, conversely, employs a momentum strategy within the S&P 500, selecting high-performing stocks to capture upside in trending conditions. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary paths: stability versus dynamic factor enhancement, aiding investors navigating volatility from earnings cycles and macroeconomic shifts.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is a passive fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, comprising the top 750 U.S. companies by float-adjusted market capitalization. With approximately 752 holdings, it emphasizes broad diversification across growth and value styles. Top holdings include NVDA (~7%), AAPL (~6%), MSFT (~5%), AMZN (~3%), and Alphabet Class A/C (~3% combined), representing about 34% of assets. Sector allocations feature technology at ~33%, financial services ~13%, healthcare ~12%, and consumer cyclical ~11%. Its ultralow expense ratio of 0.03% and low portfolio turnover (~3%) underscore cost efficiency and tax effectiveness, with high liquidity supporting institutional and retail trading.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is a passive smart-beta fund based on the S&P 500 Momentum Index, selecting ~100 S&P 500 constituents with the highest volatility-adjusted momentum scores from 12-month price performance (excluding the latest month). Holdings total around 100-102, leading to greater concentration. Top holdings feature AVGO (~9%), NVDA (~9%), META (~8%), JPM (~5%), comprising over 50% of assets. Sector breakdown shows technology ~32%, financial services ~20%, communication services ~14%, industrials ~13%, and consumer defensive ~7%. The expense ratio is 0.13%, with semi-annual rebalancing in March and September, introducing moderate turnover suitable for momentum capture.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap U.S. equity landscape remains dominated by technology and AI-driven innovation, with capital flows concentrating in mega-caps amid persistent inflation concerns and Federal Reserve policy pivots. Momentum strategies like SPMO benefit from sustained trends in semiconductors and cloud computing, fueled by enterprise AI adoption and earnings beats from holdings like NVDA. Broader indices such as SCHX reflect sector rotation into financials and industrials as rate cut expectations moderate, alongside geopolitical tensions impacting energy and supply chains. Regulatory scrutiny on big tech and antitrust developments pose risks, while macroeconomic drivers like productivity gains support large-cap resilience over recent cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, SPMO has demonstrated stronger relative positioning in momentum-favorable environments, outperforming SCHX by capturing upside from tech and financial leaders during AI hype and earnings seasons. In broader market cycles, SPMO's concentrated bets have delivered higher returns—such as ~26% over the past year versus SCHX's ~20%—tied to sector rotations favoring high-flyers. However, SPMO exhibits elevated volatility, with standard deviation around 15-20% compared to SCHX's more stable ~11-13%, amplifying drawdowns during reversals like growth stock corrections. SCHX's diversification buffers volatility from interest rate shifts and commodity trends, positioning it for consistent beta exposure, while SPMO thrives on trend persistence but risks underperformance in mean-reversion phases.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, designed to outperform across stocks, ETFs, and crypto under current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies including momentum, sector rotation, technical patterns, and fundamental analysis, operating on timeframes like 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute charts. Options span AI Trading Signal Agents for real-time alerts, Virtual Agents with customizable risk management, and Brokerage Agents for automated execution. Filters allow sorting by asset class, volatility (low to high), and performance tiers via plans like Intermediate and Expert. This dynamic showcase highlights bots with strong win rates and annualized returns in live conditions, empowering users to copy proven AI-driven trades tailored to volatile environments.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SPMO for investors tolerant of higher volatility, owing to its structural momentum tilt aligning with ongoing tech and financial sector strength, superior trend consistency over recent cycles, and enhanced returns profile despite concentration risks. SCHX remains preferable for cost-sensitive, diversification-focused strategies in uncertain macro shifts. Probabilistically, SPMO holds a 60-70% edge in momentum-persistent regimes based on factor backtests and relative positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHX vs. SPMO commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHX is a Buy and SPMO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHX has more net assets: 67.4B vs. SPMO (15.3B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHX: SPMO (7.276) vs SCHX (4.197). SCHX was incepted earlier than SPMO: SCHX (16 years) vs SPMO (11 years). SCHX (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover SCHX (3.00) vs SCHX (3.00).
SCHXSPMOSCHX / SPMO
Gain YTD4.1977.27658%
Net Assets67.4B15.3B441%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.1323%
Turnover3.0044.007%
Yield1.170.91129%
Fund Existence16 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHXSPMO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNLA49.090.01
+0.02%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
GPRF50.59-0.02
-0.04%
Goldman Sachs Acs US Pref Stk &HySecETF
JUNP31.43-0.02
-0.07%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jun
KARS35.78-0.08
-0.22%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF
JIG82.61-0.44
-0.53%
JPMorgan International Growth ETF

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
-0.51%
NVDA - SPMO
74%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
AVGO - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
GS - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
ETN - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
META - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
More