NMR
Price
$5.78
Change
-$0.09 (-1.53%)
Updated
Apr 19, 6:59 PM EST
6 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$75.30
Change
+$0.41 (+0.55%)
Updated
Apr 19, 6:59 PM EST
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMR vs SF ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconNMR vs SF Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs SFBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$5.78
Change-$0.09 (-1.53%)
Volume$962.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Stifel Financial
Price$75.30
Change+$0.41 (+0.55%)
Volume$132.51K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NMR vs SF Comparison Chart

Loading...

NMRDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
NMR vs. SF commentary
Apr 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMR is a StrongBuy and SF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2024
Stock price -- (NMR: $5.77 vs. SF: $75.31)
Brand notoriety: NMR and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 106% vs. SF: 140%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $18.15B vs. SF: $7.95B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $18.15B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NMR and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.56% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +113.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2024.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for NMR with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). NMR has higher P/E ratio than SF: NMR (25.08) vs SF (18.06). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 30.155 vs. SF (9.513). SF has less debt than NMR: SF (1.18B) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than SF: NMR (1.27T) vs SF (4.29B).
NMRSFNMR / SF
Capitalization18.1B7.95B228%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.1559.513317%
P/E Ratio25.0818.06139%
Revenue1.27T4.29B29,527%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.16T1.18B1,118,793%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5868
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3817
SMR RATING
1..100
310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (77). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (38). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (3) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (10). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (44). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (20). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMRDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHV72.320.50
+0.70%
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™
IQIN33.050.11
+0.33%
IQ 500 International ETF
JPLD50.630.04
+0.08%
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
FSST23.66-0.15
-0.64%
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity ETF
DYTA27.60-0.22
-0.79%
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with IX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then IX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+0.17%
IX - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
JEF - NMR
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
ICE - NMR
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
ARBK - NMR
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
DNB - NMR
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
More