RF
Price
$19.61
Change
-$0.14 (-0.71%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
85 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$37.98
Change
-$0.80 (-2.06%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions RF vs TFC

Header iconRF vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts RF vs TFCBanner chart's image
Regions Financial
Price$19.61
Change-$0.14 (-0.71%)
Volume$2.66M
CapitalizationN/A
Truist Financial
Price$37.98
Change-$0.80 (-2.06%)
Volume$3.26M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
RF vs TFC Comparison Chart

Loading...

RFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
TFCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
RF vs. TFC commentary
Apr 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RF is a Buy and TFC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2024
Stock price -- (RF: $19.77 vs. TFC: $38.79)
Brand notoriety: RF: Notable vs. TFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RF: 132% vs. TFC: 77%
Market capitalization -- RF: $18.9B vs. TFC: $52.02B
RF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.9B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

RF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.83% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2024.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for RF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TFC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than RF($18.9B). RF has higher P/E ratio than TFC: RF (9.74) vs TFC (7.93). TFC YTD gains are higher at: 6.604 vs. RF (3.348). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.07B vs. RF (1.55B). RF has less debt than TFC: RF (2.33B) vs TFC (59.7B). TFC has higher revenues than RF: TFC (23.4B) vs RF (7.57B).
RFTFCRF / TFC
Capitalization18.9B52B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.3486.60451%
P/E Ratio9.747.93123%
Revenue7.57B23.4B32%
Total Cash1.55B5.07B31%
Total Debt2.33B59.7B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RF vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
RF
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
157
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4416
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2681
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (86) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (100) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (6) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (81) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RFTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
TFCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMRT2.370.05
+2.16%
SmartRent
ESTC103.711.17
+1.14%
Elastic NV
PARR32.69-0.06
-0.18%
Par Pacific Holdings
THAR0.37-0.01
-1.85%
Tharimmune
LUNA2.05-0.17
-7.66%
Luna Innovations