TPL
Price
$401.34
Change
-$1.29 (-0.32%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.69B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZPTAF
Price
$7.25
Change
+$0.12 (+1.68%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
729.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TPL vs ZPTAF

Header iconTPL vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts TPL vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
TPL vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) vs. Surge Energy Inc. (ZPTAF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) offers stable royalty income from Permian Basin assets with a $30 billion market cap, contrasting Surge Energy Inc.'s (ZPTAF) smaller $720 million cap and active oil production in Canada.
  • Both stocks posted strong year-to-date gains—TPL at 51% and ZPTAF at 45%—fueled by elevated energy prices.
  • ZPTAF provides a higher dividend yield of 5.22%, appealing to income-focused traders, while TPL's 0.55% yield pairs with lower volatility (beta of 0.77).
  • Recent weeks saw TPL dip ahead of earnings, yet analysts anticipate growth; ZPTAF maintained steadier trading.
  • Energy sector tailwinds support relative performance, with ZPTAF delivering 122% one-year returns versus TPL's modest 0.2%.
  • Both report earnings on May 6, 2026, potentially shifting market sentiment.

Introduction

In today's dynamic energy market, comparing TPL—a premier land royalty company—and ZPTAF—a focused oil and gas producer—illuminates key trade-offs in stability versus growth potential. Investors eyeing diversified energy exposure, whether through passive royalties or operational upside, will find value in this stock comparison. With both benefiting from sustained oil prices and Permian/Canadian basin activity, the analysis highlights recent momentum, risk profiles, and positioning for traders balancing yield, volatility, and catalysts.

TPL Overview and Recent Performance

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) manages extensive surface land and subsurface rights in the Permian Basin, generating oil and gas royalties (nonparticipating perpetual royalty interests, or NPRIs) alongside water services for operators. This asset-light model minimizes operational risks while capitalizing on regional production booms. In recent market activity, TPL shares dipped over 2% to around $434 amid broader sector rotation, yet year-to-date gains exceed 51%. Influences include robust Permian output, a recent dividend increase to $0.60 quarterly, and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on May 6, forecasting EPS growth. Sentiment remains positive, supported by low beta (0.77, a volatility measure relative to the market) and analyst previews highlighting revenue expansion from water infrastructure.

ZPTAF Overview and Recent Performance

Surge Energy Inc. (ZPTAF) is an exploration and production (E&P) company targeting oil and gas in Western Canada's Sparky, Sawn, and Nevis areas. Its hands-on model drives growth through drilling and asset optimization. Recent weeks featured stable trading around $7.30, down slightly from prior close, with year-to-date returns near 45% and one-year gains over 122%. Key drivers include favorable crude prices bolstering cash flows and a confirmed monthly dividend, yielding 5.22%. An analyst upgrade to Outperform in late March enhanced sentiment. Q1 earnings due May 6 could spotlight production updates, though higher payout ratio (130%) signals dividend sustainability scrutiny amid commodity swings.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from 5-minute scalps to multi-week swings—with timeframes like 15 minutes to 49 days. Standouts boast annualized returns of 30% to 126%, win rates of 50-70%, profit factors above 1.5-4.5, and strong profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17. Energy sector bots, for instance, show 76% annualized gains on 18 tickers. Selected for current volatility and backtested edge, they adapt to market shifts in semis, data centers, and commodities. Traders can copy these for automated execution; explore Trending AI Robots to match styles to energy plays like TPL and ZPTAF.

Head-to-Head Comparison

TPL’s passive royalty business contrasts ZPTAF’s active E&P operations, offering fee-like income versus drilling-dependent output. Growth drivers differ: TPL diversifies via water treatment royalties, while ZPTAF leverages regional acquisitions. Recent momentum favors ZPTAF’s 122% one-year surge, but TPL leads YTD with Permian stability. Risk factors include oil price sensitivity for both, yet TPL’s lower beta (0.77 vs. 0.67) and no capex needs reduce volatility; ZPTAF faces execution risks and payout pressures. U.S. Permian exposure gives TPL scale advantages over Canadian basins. Market sentiment tilts toward TPL’s earnings optimism versus ZPTAF’s yield appeal.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor TPL with higher conviction, citing its trend consistency in the high-output Permian, lower relative risk, and projected earnings catalysts amid stable royalties. While ZPTAF shows compelling momentum and income potential, its smaller scale introduces greater variability. This positioning suggests TPL for probable outperformance in steady energy uptrends, though both merit monitoring post-earnings.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TPL vs. ZPTAF commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TPL is a Hold and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (TPL: $401.39 vs. ZPTAF: $7.25)
Brand notoriety: TPL and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TPL: 78% vs. ZPTAF: 13%
Market capitalization -- TPL: $27.69B vs. ZPTAF: $729.25M
TPL [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $27.69B. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $729.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $143.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $5.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TPL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZPTAF is a better buy in the long-term than TPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPL is a better buy in the short-term than ZPTAF.

Price Growth

TPL (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

TPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-2.32% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPL($27.7B) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($729M). ZPTAF has higher P/E ratio than TPL: ZPTAF (141.82) vs TPL (55.06). ZPTAF YTD gains are higher at: 44.325 vs. TPL (39.910). TPL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 706M vs. ZPTAF (207M). TPL has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. ZPTAF (22.1M). TPL has less debt than ZPTAF: TPL (15.8M) vs ZPTAF (241M). TPL has higher revenues than ZPTAF: TPL (839M) vs ZPTAF (577M).
TPLZPTAFTPL / ZPTAF
Capitalization27.7B729M3,800%
EBITDA706M207M341%
Gain YTD39.91044.32590%
P/E Ratio55.06141.8239%
Revenue839M577M145%
Total Cash248M22.1M1,122%
Total Debt15.8M241M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TPL vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
TPL
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
718
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5372
SMR RATING
1..100
2689
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
692
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as TPL (85) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.

TPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (72) in the null industry. This means that TPL’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TPL's SMR Rating (26) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZPTAF (89) in the null industry. This means that TPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TPL (58) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TPL (69) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TPLZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZPTAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYAUX59.16N/A
N/A
Rydex Utilities H
POLEX12.79N/A
N/A
Polar Capital Emerging Market Strs Instl
AMGIX41.86-0.09
-0.21%
American Century Disciplined Value I
HFQIX7.92-0.04
-0.50%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income I
HFEAX63.21-0.60
-0.94%
Janus Henderson European Focus A