Advertisement
ADI or FN or KLAC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Analog Devices (ADI) vs. Fabrinet (FN) vs. KLA Corporation (KLAC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ADI delivers steady growth in analog semiconductors with recent revenue beats and AI-driven demand, up about 48% over the past year but facing short-term margin pressures.
- FN leads in momentum as an optical manufacturing specialist, with explosive 174% one-year gains fueled by AI data center optics, though recent volatility highlights supply risks.
- KLAC dominates process control with robust Q2 results, a $7B buyback, and 21% dividend hike, posting nearly 100% annual returns amid semiconductor yield management demand.
- All three benefit from AI infrastructure tailwinds, but FN shows highest relative performance while KLAC offers stability through shareholder returns.
- Recent market activity reflects sector pressures, with shares dipping amid geopolitical tensions, yet long-term positioning remains strong across analog, optics, and inspection niches.
- Analyst targets suggest upside: ADI at $385, FN at $574, KLAC at $1,676, pointing to continued semiconductor sector resilience.
Introduction
This comparison examines ADI, FN, and KLAC, key players in the semiconductor ecosystem spanning analog chips, precision optics manufacturing, and process control equipment. These stocks appeal to traders tracking AI infrastructure growth, data center expansion, and advanced chip production trends. Investors seeking exposure to relative performance in a volatile sector will find value in contrasting their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning amid ongoing demand for high-performance electronics.
ADI Overview and Recent Performance
Analog Devices (ADI) designs, manufactures, and markets integrated circuits, software, and subsystems, focusing on analog, mixed-signal, and digital signal processing for industrial, automotive, communications, and consumer applications. In recent market activity, ADI shares have navigated sector volatility, trading around $306 with a 48% one-year gain and 11-15% YTD rise. Strong Q4 results showed revenue up 30% year-over-year to $3.16 billion, beating estimates, driven by resilient demand in AI and data centers. Guidance for upcoming quarters exceeded expectations, supported by above-seasonal performance in automotive test equipment and aerospace. Sentiment reflects optimism from analyst upgrades and a projected 44% earnings growth, tempered by recent dips from margin plans amid competitive pressures.
FN Overview and Recent Performance
Fabrinet (FN) provides advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services for optical communications, data centers, automotive, and industrial lasers, serving OEMs with complex electro-mechanical assembly. Recent performance has been stellar, with shares around $513 reflecting a 174% one-year surge and strong YTD gains. Q4 fiscal 2025 revenue hit a record $910 million, up 21% year-over-year, led by 46% growth in optical communications including data center interconnects at 12% of sales. Sequential datacom improvements and new AWS partnerships bolstered non-GAAP EPS to $2.65. Despite short-term supply constraints on components, upbeat Q1 guidance and AI optics ramp signal sustained momentum, driving positive trader interest.
KLAC Overview and Recent Performance
KLA Corporation (KLAC) supplies process control, inspection, and yield management solutions for semiconductor fabrication, including wafer metrology and defect analysis tools. Shares trade near $1,448, up nearly 100% over the past year with solid YTD performance despite recent sector pullbacks. Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue reached $3.30 billion, up 7% year-over-year and above guidance, with non-GAAP EPS at $8.85 fueled by demand in leading-edge logic, high-bandwidth memory, and AI packaging. A $7 billion share repurchase and 21% dividend increase to $2.30 per share underscored financial strength. Performance ties to rising process control needs, fostering resilient sentiment amid geopolitical volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ advanced pattern recognition, trend prediction, and sector-specific logic, with standout performers delivering annualized returns up to 159% on leveraged ETFs like SOXL, win rates exceeding 90%, and profit factors around 2.5 in recent periods. For instance, semiconductor-focused agents have achieved 102-127% returns amid AI rotations, while multi-agent models in tech and industrials post 77-112% gains. Only the most suitable for current volatility—balancing growth, momentum, and risk—earn trending status. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with today’s market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ADI, FN, and KLAC operate in complementary semiconductor niches: ADI’s analog focus supports broad end-markets with stable industrial exposure, while FN’s contract manufacturing emphasizes high-growth optics for AI data centers, and KLAC’s inspection tools enable yield optimization at advanced nodes. Growth drivers diverge—FN leads with 19-36% revenue jumps from datacom ramps, outpacing ADI’s 16-30% and KLAC’s 7-23%—but recent momentum favors FN’s 174% annual gain over KLAC’s 100% and ADI’s 48%. Risk profiles reflect trade-offs: FN faces customer concentration (e.g., NVIDIA at 28%) and supply issues, ADI margin competition, and KLAC China exposure. Valuation sensitivity is elevated across the board, with high P/E ratios amid AI hype, yet KLAC’s buybacks enhance appeal. Market sentiment tilts toward AI enablers, positioning FN for optics upside and KLAC for defensive stability versus ADI’s diversified base.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FN for its superior trend consistency in AI optics and explosive relative positioning, with recent earnings beats and data center catalysts suggesting higher probabilistic upside. KLAC ranks closely for stability via buybacks and process control demand, while ADI trails slightly on momentum despite solid analog exposure. Observable factors like win rates in sector bots underscore FN’s edge in current conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KLAC’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
- ADI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KLAC’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KLAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ADI (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.87% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.47% , and KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated +2.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +9.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADI is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2026.
FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+10.22% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electronic Components (+4.16% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Electronic Production Equipment (+9.07% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| ADI | FN | KLAC | |
| Capitalization | 186B | 25.1B | 237B |
| EBITDA | 5.53B | 466M | 5.91B |
| Gain YTD | 40.945 | 53.754 | 48.769 |
| P/E Ratio | 69.66 | 67.12 | 52.56 |
| Revenue | 11.8B | 3.89B | 12.7B |
| Total Cash | 4.05B | 961M | 5.21B |
| Total Debt | 8.68B | 4.89M | 6.11B |
ADI | FN | KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 31 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 4 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 46 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 35 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 5 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADI's Valuation (45) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (74) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KLAC (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ADI's stock grew similarly to FN’s and somewhat faster than KLAC’s over the last 12 months.
FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as ADI (10) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to ADI’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ADI (77) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s and somewhat faster than ADI’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ADI (4) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as FN (35) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to ADI’s and similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.
FN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ADI (40) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and somewhat faster than ADI’s over the last 12 months.
| ADI | FN | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | N/A | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OVS | 39.96 | 0.19 | +0.47% |
| Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF | |||
| REZ | 89.67 | 0.38 | +0.43% |
| iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF | |||
| FTPA | 8.69 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Inc ETF | |||
| UAUG | 40.97 | -0.07 | -0.17% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BufferETFAug | |||
| SCHF | 26.76 | -0.12 | -0.45% |
| Schwab International Equity ETF™ | |||
ADI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADI has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADI jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADI | 100% | +2.58% | ||
| MCHP - ADI | 83% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| LRCX - ADI | 79% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| KLAC - ADI | 79% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| ENTG - ADI | 78% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| KLIC - ADI | 77% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
FN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with GLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then GLW could also see price increases.
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 85% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||