AEM
Price
$180.33
Change
-$12.33 (-6.40%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
90.41B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CDE
Price
$17.61
Change
-$1.79 (-9.23%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.22B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IAG
Price
$16.98
Change
-$1.49 (-8.07%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.84B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM or CDE or IAG

Header iconAEM vs CDE vs IAG Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs CDE vs IAGBanner chart's image
AEM vs CDE vs IAG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) vs. Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) vs. IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AEM demonstrates superior stability with a market cap exceeding $91 billion and record Q1 2026 earnings, producing 825,000 ounces of gold.
  • CDE boasts explosive one-year returns of over 226%, bolstered by recent debt restructuring following its New Gold acquisition, though YTD gains lag at 1%.
  • IAG shows robust one-year performance of 144% with a lower PE ratio of 14.55, driven by strong past earnings amid gold price strength.
  • All three benefit from elevated gold prices, but AEM leads in YTD returns at 8.47%, highlighting relative outperformance in recent market activity.
  • Higher-risk profiles mark CDE and IAG due to smaller scale and operational leverage, contrasting AEM's diversified, low-cost production.
  • Upcoming Q1 earnings for CDE and IAG could shift sentiment in the competitive gold mining sector.

Introduction

In the current market environment, gold mining stocks like AEM, CDE, and IAG have drawn attention amid sustained high gold prices and sector momentum. This comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and positioning for traders seeking exposure to precious metals and investors eyeing growth in basic materials. With gold acting as a hedge against inflation and geopolitical tensions, these NYSE-listed producers offer varied risk-reward profiles suited to different strategies, from conservative stability to high-momentum plays.

AEM Overview and Recent Performance

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a leading gold producer with operations in stable jurisdictions including Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company focuses on low-cost, high-margin assets, producing gold alongside byproducts like silver and copper. In recent market activity, AEM reported record Q1 2026 results, including 825,109 ounces of payable gold production, adjusted net income of about $1.7 billion, and free cash flow near $730 million, beating earnings estimates. Shares traded around $183.56 as of early May, with YTD gains of 8.47% reflecting resilience despite some post-earnings volatility. Sentiment has been buoyed by reaffirmed 2026 production guidance of 3.3-3.5 million ounces and strategic expansions like in Nunavut, though higher input costs tempered gains amid gold price fluctuations.

CDE Overview and Recent Performance

Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) operates gold and silver mines primarily in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with key assets like Rochester, Wharf, and Kensington. It diversifies into zinc and lead, selling concentrates via off-take agreements. Recent weeks have seen CDE navigate post-acquisition integration of New Gold, completing a $385.8 million note exchange to strengthen its balance sheet. The stock, near $17.65, posted YTD returns of 1.01% but impressive one-year gains over 226%, driven by operational improvements and gold strength. Trading volume spiked amid debt moves, with Q1 earnings due May 6 potentially influencing momentum. Performance reflects leverage to metal prices, offset by higher volatility compared to peers.

IAG Overview and Recent Performance

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is a mid-tier gold producer with flagship Côté Gold in Canada and operations in Burkina Faso. It emphasizes development projects for growth. In recent market activity, shares hovered at $16.59, with YTD performance at 0.96% and one-year returns of 144.33%, fueled by prior strong earnings and sustainability initiatives. Q1 2026 results are anticipated soon, with forecasts for earnings growth amid Côté ramp-up. Sentiment benefits from gold tailwinds and ESG reporting, though geopolitical risks in key regions add caution. Relative performance lags YTD peers but shows upside potential from project milestones.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total, curated for current market conditions based on real-time performance. These bots employ diverse strategies—from swing trading and trend following to high-win-rate signal agents and leveraged ETF plays—across timeframes like intraday to multi-week holds. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +163.10%, win rates ranging 51-88%, profit factors to 4.49, and bots targeting sectors like precious metals, semiconductors, and AI infrastructure. Precious metals bots, for instance, focus on gold miners with durations around 6 days. Explore these high-performing, risk-managed options tailored to volatile markets like gold stocks.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AEM, CDE, and IAG operate in gold mining but differ in scale and exposure: AEM’s large-cap status ($92B market cap) and diversified, low-risk mines yield consistent output, contrasting CDE’s mid-tier multi-metal focus and IAG’s growth-oriented projects in riskier regions. Recent momentum favors AEM’s YTD lead, while CDE and IAG offer higher one-year surges but greater drawdowns. Risks include cost inflation for all, amplified by geopolitics for IAG and debt for CDE. Valuation sensitivity shows IAG’s lowest PE (14.55), with market sentiment tilting toward AEM’s earnings reliability amid gold volatility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward AEM based on trend consistency, record Q1 margins, and superior YTD positioning relative to peers. Its production stability and cash generation provide probabilistic edge over CDE’s acquisition-driven volatility and IAG’s pending catalysts, though momentum shifts could favor the others if gold rallies intensify.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $180.33CDE: $17.61IAG: $16.98)
Brand notoriety: AEM, CDE and IAG are all not notable
The three companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 110%, CDE: 136%, IAG: 72%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $90.41B, CDE: $18.22B, IAG: $9.84B
$AEM is valued at $90.41B, while CDE has a market capitalization of $18.22B, and IAG's market capitalization is $9.84B. The market cap for tickers in this @Precious Metals ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Precious Metals industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and IAG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAG is a better buy in the long-term than AEM, which in turn is a better option than CDE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and IAG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CDE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAG is a better buy in the short-term than AEM, which in turn is a better option than CDE.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while CDE (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.12% , and IAG (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -9.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

CDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

IAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($90.4B) has a higher market cap than CDE($18.2B) and IAG($9.84B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than CDE and IAG: AEM (16.98) vs CDE (14.20) and IAG (9.93). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 6.561 vs. IAG (2.971) and CDE (-1.234). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.74B vs. IAG (1.96B) and CDE (1.31B). AEM has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. CDE (843M) and IAG (551M). AEM has less debt than IAG and CDE: AEM (319M) vs IAG (651M) and CDE (773M). AEM has higher revenues than IAG and CDE: AEM (13.5B) vs IAG (3.41B) and CDE (2.57B).
AEMCDEIAG
Capitalization90.4B18.2B9.84B
EBITDA9.74B1.31B1.96B
Gain YTD6.561-1.2342.971
P/E Ratio16.9814.209.93
Revenue13.5B2.57B3.41B
Total Cash3.12B843M551M
Total Debt319M773M651M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs CDE vs IAG: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
CDE
IAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
636064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
315732
SMR RATING
1..100
436336
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
504241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76908
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
755046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IAG's Valuation (71) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (75) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to CDE’s and similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as IAG (32) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as CDE (57) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM's stock grew similarly to IAG’s and similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

IAG's SMR Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (43) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CDE (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

IAG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (42) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as AEM (50) in the null industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to CDE’s and similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

IAG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (76) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CDE (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IAG's stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s and significantly faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMCDEIAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HACK88.550.95
+1.08%
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
CAMX33.84N/A
N/A
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
MULT24.98-0.11
-0.44%
Franklin Multisector Income ETF
QQWZ28.36-0.42
-1.47%
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq100RotatorETF
PJP105.66-2.20
-2.04%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
-9.23%
PAAS - CDE
78%
Closely correlated
-7.68%
SA - CDE
78%
Closely correlated
-6.81%
RGLD - CDE
73%
Closely correlated
-5.09%
FNV - CDE
71%
Closely correlated
-5.30%
AEM - CDE
71%
Closely correlated
-6.40%
More

IAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IAG has been closely correlated with CGAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IAG jumps, then CGAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAG
1D Price
Change %
IAG100%
-8.07%
CGAU - IAG
86%
Closely correlated
-7.11%
KGC - IAG
85%
Closely correlated
-8.13%
AEM - IAG
85%
Closely correlated
-6.40%
AGI - IAG
84%
Closely correlated
-7.43%
WPM - IAG
83%
Closely correlated
-6.36%
More