In the current market environment, gold mining stocks like AEM, CDE, and IAG have drawn attention amid sustained high gold prices and sector momentum. This comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and positioning for traders seeking exposure to precious metals and investors eyeing growth in basic materials. With gold acting as a hedge against inflation and geopolitical tensions, these NYSE-listed producers offer varied risk-reward profiles suited to different strategies, from conservative stability to high-momentum plays.
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a leading gold producer with operations in stable jurisdictions including Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company focuses on low-cost, high-margin assets, producing gold alongside byproducts like silver and copper. In recent market activity, AEM reported record Q1 2026 results, including 825,109 ounces of payable gold production, adjusted net income of about $1.7 billion, and free cash flow near $730 million, beating earnings estimates. Shares traded around $183.56 as of early May, with YTD gains of 8.47% reflecting resilience despite some post-earnings volatility. Sentiment has been buoyed by reaffirmed 2026 production guidance of 3.3-3.5 million ounces and strategic expansions like in Nunavut, though higher input costs tempered gains amid gold price fluctuations.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) operates gold and silver mines primarily in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with key assets like Rochester, Wharf, and Kensington. It diversifies into zinc and lead, selling concentrates via off-take agreements. Recent weeks have seen CDE navigate post-acquisition integration of New Gold, completing a $385.8 million note exchange to strengthen its balance sheet. The stock, near $17.65, posted YTD returns of 1.01% but impressive one-year gains over 226%, driven by operational improvements and gold strength. Trading volume spiked amid debt moves, with Q1 earnings due May 6 potentially influencing momentum. Performance reflects leverage to metal prices, offset by higher volatility compared to peers.
IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is a mid-tier gold producer with flagship Côté Gold in Canada and operations in Burkina Faso. It emphasizes development projects for growth. In recent market activity, shares hovered at $16.59, with YTD performance at 0.96% and one-year returns of 144.33%, fueled by prior strong earnings and sustainability initiatives. Q1 2026 results are anticipated soon, with forecasts for earnings growth amid Côté ramp-up. Sentiment benefits from gold tailwinds and ESG reporting, though geopolitical risks in key regions add caution. Relative performance lags YTD peers but shows upside potential from project milestones.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total, curated for current market conditions based on real-time performance. These bots employ diverse strategies—from swing trading and trend following to high-win-rate signal agents and leveraged ETF plays—across timeframes like intraday to multi-week holds. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +163.10%, win rates ranging 51-88%, profit factors to 4.49, and bots targeting sectors like precious metals, semiconductors, and AI infrastructure. Precious metals bots, for instance, focus on gold miners with durations around 6 days. Explore these high-performing, risk-managed options tailored to volatile markets like gold stocks.
AEM, CDE, and IAG operate in gold mining but differ in scale and exposure: AEM’s large-cap status ($92B market cap) and diversified, low-risk mines yield consistent output, contrasting CDE’s mid-tier multi-metal focus and IAG’s growth-oriented projects in riskier regions. Recent momentum favors AEM’s YTD lead, while CDE and IAG offer higher one-year surges but greater drawdowns. Risks include cost inflation for all, amplified by geopolitics for IAG and debt for CDE. Valuation sensitivity shows IAG’s lowest PE (14.55), with market sentiment tilting toward AEM’s earnings reliability amid gold volatility.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward AEM based on trend consistency, record Q1 margins, and superior YTD positioning relative to peers. Its production stability and cash generation provide probabilistic edge over CDE’s acquisition-driven volatility and IAG’s pending catalysts, though momentum shifts could favor the others if gold rallies intensify.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and IAG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and IAG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while CDE (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.12% , and IAG (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -9.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
CDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
IAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | CDE | IAG | |
| Capitalization | 90.4B | 18.2B | 9.84B |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 1.31B | 1.96B |
| Gain YTD | 6.561 | -1.234 | 2.971 |
| P/E Ratio | 16.98 | 14.20 | 9.93 |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 2.57B | 3.41B |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 843M | 551M |
| Total Debt | 319M | 773M | 651M |
AEM | CDE | IAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 60 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 57 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 63 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 90 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IAG's Valuation (71) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (75) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to CDE’s and similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as IAG (32) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as CDE (57) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM's stock grew similarly to IAG’s and similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's SMR Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (43) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CDE (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (42) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as AEM (50) in the null industry. This means that IAG's stock grew similarly to CDE’s and similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (76) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CDE (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that IAG's stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s and significantly faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | CDE | IAG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDE | 100% | -9.23% | ||
| PAAS - CDE | 78% Closely correlated | -7.68% | ||
| SA - CDE | 78% Closely correlated | -6.81% | ||
| RGLD - CDE | 73% Closely correlated | -5.09% | ||
| FNV - CDE | 71% Closely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| AEM - CDE | 71% Closely correlated | -6.40% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IAG has been closely correlated with CGAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IAG jumps, then CGAU could also see price increases.