ALAB
Price
$174.05
Change
+$3.24 (+1.90%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.63B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ARM
Price
$166.73
Change
+$4.40 (+2.71%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
177.07B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSEM
Price
$226.45
Change
+$11.70 (+5.45%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.6B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or ARM or TSEM

Header iconALAB vs ARM vs TSEM Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs ARM vs TSEMBanner chart's image
ALAB vs ARM vs TSEM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Arm Holdings (ARM) vs. Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Astera Labs (ALAB) specializes in AI connectivity solutions, posting strong Q4 revenue growth of 92% YoY but trading at a premium P/E over 100x amid recent volatility.
  • Arm Holdings (ARM) benefits from robust 26% revenue growth in AI and data centers, yet faces elevated valuations around 159x P/E and recent share price pullbacks.
  • Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) reported record Q4 revenue up 14% YoY, with YTD gains of 15% and 1-year returns exceeding 250%, driven by SiPho and RF demand.
  • All three stocks operate in the AI/semiconductor space, but TSEM shows superior recent momentum and relative value at a P/E around 78x compared to peers.
  • Market sentiment favors AI infrastructure plays, with hyperscaler demand boosting connectivity and foundry specialties, though valuations reflect growth expectations.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines ALAB, ARM, and TSEM, three key players in the semiconductor sector fueled by AI infrastructure demand. Astera Labs focuses on connectivity solutions, Arm Holdings on CPU IP licensing, and Tower Semiconductor on specialty foundry services. Traders seeking exposure to AI data centers, cloud scaling, and high-performance computing will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum and valuation amid broader sector rotation, aiding informed decisions on stock comparison and portfolio allocation.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) designs semiconductor-based connectivity solutions for cloud and AI infrastructure, including PCIe retimers and fabric switches serving hyperscalers. In recent quarters, the company reported Q4 2025 revenues of $270.6 million, up 91.8% year-over-year, beating estimates despite a non-GAAP gross margin dip to 75.7%. Stock behavior reflects volatility, with shares down 13% post-earnings but up over 70% in the past year amid AI ramps. Analyst upgrades and partnerships with NVIDIA and AMD have supported sentiment, though premium valuations and PCIe competition temper gains in recent market activity. YTD performance trails peers at around -25%, highlighting sensitivity to broader tech corrections.

ARM Overview and Recent Performance

Arm Holdings plc (ARM) architects and licenses CPU IP, graphics, and systems for semiconductors, powering mobile, automotive, and AI applications. Recent performance includes 26% year-over-year revenue growth driven by AI data center demand, with shares experiencing pullbacks of 9% over three months despite long-term gains. The asset-light model yields scalable royalties, but elevated P/E ratios near 159x reflect high expectations amid regulatory scrutiny and valuation debates. In recent weeks, momentum has cooled with modest YTD returns near flat, influenced by market rotation away from high-flyers, though AI partnerships sustain positive analyst views.

TSEM Overview and Recent Performance

Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) operates as an independent foundry offering specialty processes like SiGe, SiPho, and RF CMOS for automotive, industrial, and AI uses. Recent quarters showed record Q4 2025 revenue of $440 million, up 14% YoY and 11% sequentially, with full-year growth of 9%. Shares have surged over 250% in the past year and 15% YTD, outperforming benchmarks amid photonics partnerships for AI infrastructure. Sentiment benefits from capacity expansions and hyperscaler demand for 1.6T PICs, though regional risks exist. Recent market strength underscores resilience versus pure-play AI names.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from 351 total, curated by AI analysis for best performance in market volatility across key industries like semiconductors, aerospace, and energy. These bots, including signal agents, trend traders, and hedging strategies on timeframes from 5min to 60min, deliver impressive stats: annualized returns up to +208%, win rates from 52% to 95%, and profit factors reaching 25.83. Specialized semiconductor bots like those on SOXL and MPWR post +109% and +85% annualized returns with 70% win rates. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots trading thousands of tickers with diverse styles, but only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot here. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB, ARM, and TSEM share AI/semiconductor exposure but differ in models: ALAB's fabless connectivity versus ARM's IP licensing and TSEM's foundry customization. Growth drivers include hyperscaler ramps for all, but TSEM gains from diversified SiPho/RF versus ALAB and ARM's AI focus. Recent momentum favors TSEM at 15% YTD and 250% 1-year, outpacing ALAB's volatility and ARM's flat returns. Risks: competition for ALAB, regulation for ARM, geopolitics for TSEM. Valuations show TSEM at 78x P/E more attractive than peers' 100x+, with sentiment tilting to stable growth over hype.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSEM due to consistent trend strength, record revenues, superior relative performance (15% YTD, 250% 1-year), and balanced valuation amid AI tailwinds. While ALAB and ARM offer high-growth potential, TSEM's catalysts in photonics and lower risk profile suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $174.05ARM: $166.73TSEM: $226.45)
Brand notoriety: ALAB, ARM and TSEM are all not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 127%, ARM: 99%, TSEM: 79%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $29.63B, ARM: $177.07B, TSEM: $24.6B
$ALAB is valued at $29.63B, while ARM has a market capitalization of $177.07B, and TSEM's market capitalization is $24.6B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileARM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TSEM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ARM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB and TSEM are a better buy in the long-term than ARM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ARM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSEM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ARM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSEM is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB and ARM.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +16.77% price change this week, while ARM (@Semiconductors) price change was +11.95% , and TSEM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

ARM is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.

TSEM is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARM($177B) has a higher market cap than ALAB($29.6B) and TSEM($24.6B). ARM has higher P/E ratio than ALAB and TSEM: ARM (222.31) vs ALAB (142.66) and TSEM (116.72). TSEM YTD gains are higher at: 92.855 vs. ARM (52.530) and ALAB (4.623). ARM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. TSEM (507M) and ALAB (180M). ARM has more cash in the bank: 3.54B vs. TSEM (1.22B) and ALAB (1.19B). ALAB has less debt than TSEM and ARM: ALAB (4.15M) vs TSEM (164M) and ARM (461M). ARM has higher revenues than TSEM and ALAB: ARM (4.67B) vs TSEM (1.51B) and ALAB (853M).
ALABARMTSEM
Capitalization29.6B177B24.6B
EBITDA180M1.11B507M
Gain YTD4.62352.53092.855
P/E Ratio142.66222.31116.72
Revenue853M4.67B1.51B
Total Cash1.19B3.54B1.22B
Total Debt4.15M461M164M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSEM: Fundamental Ratings
TSEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABARMTSEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ARM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QABA62.621.49
+2.43%
First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF
IFLO33.040.35
+1.09%
VictoryShares Intl Free Csh Flow ETF
IBHI23.540.06
+0.26%
iShares iBonds 2029 Term HY & Inc ETF
MUNI52.560.12
+0.23%
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF
MULL186.85-1.78
-0.94%
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+1.90%
CRDO - ALAB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
KLIC - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More

ARM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARM
1D Price
Change %
ARM100%
+2.71%
LRCX - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
KLAC - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
AMAT - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
FORM - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+7.46%
VECO - ARM
66%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More