ALAB
Price
$129.46
Change
+$4.00 (+3.19%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.04B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ASML
Price
$1448.64
Change
+$27.59 (+1.94%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
546.17B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$127.75
Change
+$0.24 (+0.19%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
136.31B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or ASML or QCOM

Header iconALAB vs ASML vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs ASML vs QCOMBanner chart's image
ALAB vs ASML vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. ASML Holding (ASML) vs. QUALCOMM (QCOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALAB delivered strong revenue growth of 115% in FY2025 driven by AI connectivity demand but trades at a premium P/E over 100 amid post-earnings volatility.
  • ASML benefits from a record €38.8B backlog and surging AI chip orders, with YTD gains around 30%, supported by EUV monopoly.
  • QCOM faces headwinds from potential Apple modem losses and smartphone weakness, down over 20% YTD, though diversification into AI PCs offers some offset.
  • All three expose investors to semiconductor and AI trends, but ASML's equipment leadership provides stability versus ALAB's high-growth volatility and QCOM's client risks.
  • Recent market activity shows ALAB rebounding with 7% gains on analyst upgrades, while QCOM slides on downgrades.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines ALAB, ASML, and QCOM, three key players in the semiconductor ecosystem powering AI infrastructure. ALAB focuses on connectivity solutions, ASML on lithography equipment, and QCOM on wireless chips. Traders seeking exposure to AI-driven growth and investors assessing relative performance in recent market activity will find value in understanding their business models, momentum, and risks amid sector volatility and supply chain dynamics.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) designs semiconductor connectivity solutions for cloud and AI infrastructure, targeting hyperscalers with products like PCIe, CXL, and Ethernet retimers. In recent quarters, the company reported record FY2025 revenue of $852.5 million, up 115% year-over-year, fueled by AI rack-scale demand. Stock behavior has been volatile, with shares down about 25% YTD after a post-earnings pullback on margin concerns despite Q4 beats, but rebounding over 7% recently on analyst buy ratings and partnerships like Amazon. Sentiment reflects optimism for AI connectivity growth tempered by high valuations and competition risks.

ASML Overview and Recent Performance

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) dominates extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, essential for advanced chip production by foundries like TSMC. Recent market activity highlights record Q4 bookings of €13.2 billion and a €38.8 billion backlog, driven by sustainable AI demand, lifting 2026 sales guidance to €34-39 billion. Shares have gained around 30% YTD with low single-digit volatility in recent weeks, supported by EUV monopoly and robust hyperscaler orders. Performance sentiment remains positive despite geopolitical tensions, as AI logic and memory needs bolster visibility.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) develops wireless technologies, including Snapdragon chips for mobile, automotive, and IoT. Recent quarters showed Q4 revenue of $12.25 billion, up 5%, but guidance disappointed amid smartphone weakness. Shares are down over 20% YTD and 3% in recent weeks, pressured by Apple modem transition risks—potentially $7 billion revenue hit—and analyst downgrades citing modest growth. Diversification into AI PCs and autos provides some uplift, but client concentration weighs on sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform, which trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like technical/fundamental analysis across timeframes from 5min to 60min. These bots target growth sectors including semiconductors, with standout performances such as +112% annualized returns on SOXL (semiconductors), +99% on a basket including ASML, and win rates up to 72%, profit factors over 5, amid low-to-moderate drawdowns. Virtual Agents incorporate risk management, while others provide real-time signals. Explore these adaptable bots suited to current volatility and copy the leaders adapting to market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB ($20B market cap, P/E >100) emphasizes high-growth AI connectivity with niche focus but higher beta (1.75) and valuation sensitivity versus ASML ($540B cap, P/E 48), whose equipment moat yields stable backlog-driven revenue and lower cyclicality. QCOM ($143B cap, P/E 27) offers diversified wireless exposure including autos/IoT but trails on recent momentum due to smartphone risks, contrasting ALAB's pure AI play and ASML's upstream positioning. Growth drivers favor AI infrastructure for all, yet QCOM faces client erosion while ALAB risks competition; sentiment tilts toward ASML's resilience.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ASML based on superior trend consistency from record backlogs, AI catalyst stability, and relative market positioning versus ALAB's volatility and QCOM's headwinds. Observable factors suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance amid semiconductor upcycle.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $129.46ASML: $1448.64QCOM: $127.75)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and ASML are not notable and QCOM is notable
ALAB and QCOM are part of the Semiconductors industry, and ASML is in the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 94%, ASML: 131%, QCOM: 83%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $22.04B, ASML: $546.17B, QCOM: $136.31B
$ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $22.04B. $QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $136.31B. $ASML [@Electronic Production Equipment] has a market capitalization of $ $546.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.47T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $546.17B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $110.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $46.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileASML’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the long-term than QCOM, which in turn is a better option than ALAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ASML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB, which in turn is a better option than ASML.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +10.52% price change this week, while ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +9.98% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

ASML is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.01% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASML($546B) has a higher market cap than QCOM($136B) and ALAB($22B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than ASML and QCOM: ALAB (106.11) vs ASML (50.17) and QCOM (25.76). ASML YTD gains are higher at: 35.765 vs. ALAB (-22.181) and QCOM (-24.835). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. ASML (12.6B) and ALAB (180M). ASML has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. QCOM (11.8B) and ALAB (1.19B). ALAB has less debt than ASML and QCOM: ALAB (4.15M) vs ASML (4.39B) and QCOM (14.8B). QCOM has higher revenues than ASML and ALAB: QCOM (44.9B) vs ASML (32.7B) and ALAB (853M).
ALABASMLQCOM
Capitalization22B546B136B
EBITDA180M12.6B14.8B
Gain YTD-22.18135.765-24.835
P/E Ratio106.1150.1725.76
Revenue853M32.7B44.9B
Total Cash1.19B13.3B11.8B
Total Debt4.15M4.39B14.8B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASML vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
ASML
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2689
SMR RATING
1..100
1942
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASML (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew significantly faster than ASML’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (89) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (42) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (63) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABASMLQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ASML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVS38.340.28
+0.74%
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
LEMB41.970.10
+0.24%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
LDSF19.01N/A
+0.02%
First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF
EFV77.55-0.17
-0.22%
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
FIVY23.81-0.30
-1.22%
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Inc ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+3.19%
CRDO - ALAB
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
AVGO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
More

ASML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASML has been closely correlated with ASMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASML jumps, then ASMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASML
1D Price
Change %
ASML100%
+1.94%
ASMLF - ASML
85%
Closely correlated
+4.35%
LRCX - ASML
83%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
AMAT - ASML
81%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
ASMIY - ASML
80%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
KLAC - ASML
79%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
More