ALAB
Price
$129.46
Change
+$4.00 (+3.19%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.04B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRVL
Price
$119.93
Change
+$5.48 (+4.79%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
104.87B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$9.42
Change
-$0.13 (-1.36%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or MRVL or NVTS

Header iconALAB vs MRVL vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs MRVL vs NVTSBanner chart's image
ALAB vs MRVL vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Marvell Technology (MRVL) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Astera Labs (ALAB) posted record FY2025 revenue of $852.5 million, up 115% year-over-year, fueled by AI connectivity demand, though shares have pulled back amid margin concerns.
  • Marvell Technology (MRVL) reported Q4 revenue of $2.22 billion, surpassing estimates with strong AI data center growth, driving recent share gains and optimistic long-term forecasts.
  • Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) pivoted to high-power AI data center applications with new GaN/SiC products, leading to volatile but upward recent momentum despite ongoing losses.
  • All three stocks operate in the AI/semiconductor space, with ALAB and MRVL showing profitability and scale advantages over smaller-cap NVTS.
  • Recent market activity highlights contrasts: MRVL up strongly post-earnings, ALAB volatile after beats, NVTS surging on product launches.
  • Analyst targets suggest upside: ALAB ~$207, MRVL ~$117, NVTS ~$8.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving AI infrastructure landscape, Astera Labs (ALAB), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) stand out as key semiconductor providers. These companies deliver critical connectivity, data processing, and power solutions for cloud-scale AI systems. Traders seeking exposure to AI-driven growth and investors tracking relative performance in semiconductors will find this comparison valuable, highlighting recent revenue trends, market positioning, and momentum amid hyperscaler expansions.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs (ALAB), a fabless semiconductor firm, specializes in connectivity solutions like PCIe retimers and Ethernet smart cable modules for AI and cloud infrastructure. Recent market activity has shown volatility, with shares down over 25% year-to-date after a post-earnings pullback despite Q4 revenue of $270.6 million beating estimates and full-year growth to $852.5 million, up 115% year-over-year. Sentiment reflects strong hyperscaler demand for Scorpio products but pressure from gross margin concerns and a CFO transition. Expansions like a new Israel design center bolster long-term AI scale-up positioning, with analysts maintaining buy ratings amid high P/E around 98x.

MRVL Overview and Recent Performance

Marvell Technology (MRVL) designs data infrastructure semiconductors, including Ethernet adapters, custom AI chips, and optical DSPs for data centers to the network edge. In recent weeks, shares surged post-Q4 results with $2.22 billion revenue, up 22% year-over-year and driven by 46% data center growth to over $6 billion annually. Acquisitions like Celestial AI and XConn enhance AI interconnect capabilities, fueling positive sentiment despite some earnings estimate revisions. Trading at a forward P/E near 29x with market cap around $77 billion, MRVL benefits from diversified exposure and robust FY2026 forecasts exceeding 40% in key segments.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) develops GaN and SiC power ICs for efficient power conversion in AI data centers, EVs, and charging. Recent performance has been volatile, with shares up significantly year-over-year on a "Navitas 2.0" pivot to high-power AI applications, including new low-profile packages and 3300V SiC modules. Q4 revenue dipped to $7.3 million amid mobile declines, but high-power sectors now dominate, supported by $237 million cash post-fundraise. Losses persist at -$117 million TTM on $46 million revenue, yet product launches for 800V architectures have sparked recent surges, positioning NVTS for energy-efficient AI growth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, and focus on technical/fundamental analyses tailored to current volatility. Standouts include annualized returns up to +216%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors to 25.8, such as semiconductor bots on SOXL achieving +103% returns with 71% win rates or multi-ticker AI plays at +132%. Examples span sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, and energy, with low drawdowns in trending conditions. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to today’s market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Astera Labs (ALAB), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) share AI infrastructure exposure but diverge in focus: ALAB on rack-scale connectivity, MRVL on broad data center SoCs and custom silicon, NVTS on power efficiency. Growth drivers include hyperscaler ramps for all, but MRVL’s scale yields $8+ billion revenue vs. ALAB’s $853 million and NVTS’s $46 million. Recent momentum favors MRVL post-earnings surge, while ALAB faces volatility and NVTS high-beta swings. Risks: competition in PCIe for ALAB, China exposure for MRVL, profitability for NVTS. Valuations show MRVL at ~10x sales most attractive, ALAB premium at 25x+, NVTS speculative. Sentiment tilts to established players amid sector rotations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors Marvell Technology (MRVL) due to its trend consistency, recent earnings momentum, diversified AI catalysts like custom chips and acquisitions, and relative stability with lower valuation sensitivity compared to ALAB’s post-beat volatility or NVTS’s losses. Probabilistic edge stems from scale-up positioning in data centers.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $129.46MRVL: $119.93NVTS: $9.42)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and NVTS are not notable and MRVL is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 94%, MRVL: 231%, NVTS: 92%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $22.04B, MRVL: $104.87B, NVTS: $2.17B
$ALAB is valued at $22.04B, while MRVL has a market capitalization of $104.87B, and NVTS's market capitalization is $2.17B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $110.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRVL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRVL is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB, which in turn is a better option than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRVL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB and MRVL are a better buy in the short-term than NVTS.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +10.52% price change this week, while MRVL (@Semiconductors) price change was +11.97% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

MRVL is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRVL($105B) has a higher market cap than ALAB($22B) and NVTS($2.17B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than MRVL and NVTS: ALAB (106.11) vs MRVL (39.07) and NVTS (). MRVL YTD gains are higher at: 41.229 vs. NVTS (31.933) and ALAB (-22.181). MRVL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.36B vs. ALAB (180M) and NVTS (-67.33M). MRVL has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. ALAB (1.19B) and NVTS (237M). ALAB has less debt than NVTS and MRVL: ALAB (4.15M) vs NVTS (6.47M) and MRVL (4.78B). MRVL has higher revenues than ALAB and NVTS: MRVL (7.79B) vs ALAB (853M) and NVTS (45.9M).
ALABMRVLNVTS
Capitalization22B105B2.17B
EBITDA180M4.36B-67.33M
Gain YTD-22.18141.22931.933
P/E Ratio106.1139.07N/A
Revenue853M7.79B45.9M
Total Cash1.19B2.72B237M
Total Debt4.15M4.78B6.47M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRVL: Fundamental Ratings
MRVL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABMRVLNVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRVL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOPT29.980.30
+1.01%
iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF
CEFS23.450.16
+0.69%
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
PTY12.320.02
+0.16%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
BCIL28.270.02
+0.06%
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
KMID24.85-0.04
-0.18%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+3.19%
CRDO - ALAB
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
AVGO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
More

MRVL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVL
1D Price
Change %
MRVL100%
+4.79%
LRCX - MRVL
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
ENTG - MRVL
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
TOELY - MRVL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
KLAC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
KLIC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
+6.14%
More

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
-1.36%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
More