ALAB
Price
$175.80
Change
+$1.75 (+1.01%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
29.92B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$455.04
Change
+$6.62 (+1.48%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
505.7B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ON
Price
$85.56
Change
+$2.55 (+3.07%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
33.65B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or MU or ON

Header iconALAB vs MU vs ON Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs MU vs ONBanner chart's image
ALAB vs MU vs ON Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Micron Technology (MU) vs. ON Semiconductor (ON) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Astera Labs (ALAB) focuses on AI connectivity solutions, posting record FY2025 revenue of $852.5 million (up 115% YoY), but trades at a premium P/E over 100x amid recent volatility.
  • Micron Technology (MU) leads in memory for AI data centers, with Q1 FY2026 revenue at $13.64 billion and strong HBM demand driving YTD gains exceeding 50% and a market cap near $500 billion.
  • ON Semiconductor (ON) emphasizes power and sensing solutions for autos/industrials, reporting Q4 revenue of $1.53 billion but facing a 17% monthly decline due to inventory pressures.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor/AI tailwinds, but MU shows superior momentum and scale, while ALAB offers niche growth and ON provides diversification.
  • Recent catalysts include partnerships for ALAB, HBM supply sellouts for MU, and a $6B buyback for ON.

Introduction

Astera Labs (ALAB), Micron Technology (MU), and ON Semiconductor (ON) operate in the semiconductor sector, capitalizing on AI infrastructure and data center expansion. ALAB specializes in connectivity, MU in memory solutions, and ON in power management. This comparison suits traders eyeing relative performance in AI-driven markets and investors assessing growth, valuation, and risks amid recent earnings and sector momentum. Understanding their positioning aids decisions on stock comparison and market trends.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB), based in San Jose, California, designs semiconductor connectivity solutions for cloud and AI infrastructure, serving hyperscalers like NVIDIA and Amazon. In recent market activity, shares hovered around $128 with a $22 billion market cap and trailing P/E over 100x. FY2025 revenue hit a record $852.5 million, up 115% YoY, driven by AI demand, with Q4 at $270.6 million beating estimates. Partnerships and product ramps have boosted sentiment, though volatility from high valuations and post-earnings reactions has led to pullbacks in recent weeks, reflecting sensitivity to AI hype cycles.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU), headquartered in Boise, Idaho, produces DRAM, NAND, and storage for data centers, mobiles, and autos. Recent trading saw shares near $462, with a market cap approaching $500 billion and P/E around 42x. Q1 FY2026 revenue reached a record $13.64 billion, with EPS of $4.60 beating forecasts amid surging AI HBM demand. YTD gains exceed 50%, fueled by supply sellouts through 2026 and S&P 100 inclusion. Positive analyst upgrades reflect tight memory markets, though cyclical risks temper recent momentum shifts.

ON Overview and Recent Performance

ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON), or onsemi, from Scottsdale, Arizona, delivers power, sensing, and analog solutions for automotive and industrial uses. Shares traded around $61, with a $24 billion market cap. Q4 2025 revenue was $1.53 billion, meeting estimates despite 11% YoY decline from inventory gluts, with EPS of $0.64 beating consensus. A $6B buyback authorization supported sentiment, but a 17% monthly drop highlights weakness in core segments versus AI peers. Focus on higher-margin areas aids resilience in recent market activity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like technical and fundamental analysis, with options for low, medium, or high volatility, including real-time signal agents, virtual agents with risk controls, and brokerage-integrated ones. While specific recent returns vary, top performers have delivered annualized gains up to 279% in past periods, with win rates often exceeding 70% in sectors like AI and semis. Traders can explore these adaptable bots for different timeframes and styles. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots suited to current conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB, MU, and ON share semiconductor exposure but diverge in models: ALAB's fabless AI connectivity contrasts MU's memory scale and ON's diversified power/sensing. Growth drivers favor ALAB and MU via AI ramps (115% and 99% revenue growth projections), while ON lags at single-digits amid industrials. Recent momentum shines for MU (50%+ YTD) over ALAB's volatility and ON's declines. Risks include ALAB/ MU's AI dependency versus ON's inventory cycles. Valuation sensitivity highest for ALAB (100x+ P/E), reasonable for MU (42x), and attractive for ON. Sentiment strongest around MU's catalysts, with trade-offs in scale versus niche upside.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MU due to consistent AI memory trends, robust stability from record earnings and supply dynamics, superior catalysts like HBM demand, and leading relative positioning with 50%+ YTD gains versus peers' volatility. While ALAB offers high-growth potential and ON diversification, MU's scale provides higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $175.80MU: $448.42ON: $85.56)
Brand notoriety: MU and ON are notable and ALAB is not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 111%, MU: 77%, ON: 167%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $29.92B, MU: $505.7B, ON: $33.65B
$ALAB is valued at $29.92B, while MU has a market capitalization of $505.7B, and ON's market capitalization is $33.65B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.91T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and ON’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB, which in turn is a better option than ON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ON’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ON is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB, which in turn is a better option than MU.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +5.40% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.12% , and ON (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +20.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

ON is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+10.22% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($506B) has a higher market cap than ON($33.7B) and ALAB($29.9B). ON has higher P/E ratio than ALAB and MU: ON (295.03) vs ALAB (144.10) and MU (21.16). ON and MU YTD gains are higher at: 58.006 and 57.180 vs. ALAB (5.674). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1B vs. ON (888M) and ALAB (180M). MU has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. ON (2.55B) and ALAB (1.19B). ALAB has less debt than ON and MU: ALAB (4.15M) vs ON (3.01B) and MU (10.8B). MU has higher revenues than ON and ALAB: MU (58.1B) vs ON (6B) and ALAB (853M).
ALABMUON
Capitalization29.9B506B33.7B
EBITDA180M37.1B888M
Gain YTD5.67457.18058.006
P/E Ratio144.1021.16295.03
Revenue853M58.1B6B
Total Cash1.19B14.6B2.55B
Total Debt4.15M10.8B3.01B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs ON: Fundamental Ratings
MU
ON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1664
SMR RATING
1..100
2388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (52) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ON (89). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ON (64). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (23) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ON (88). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.

ON's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (35). This means that ON’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

ON's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MU (34). This means that ON’s stock grew somewhat faster than MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABMUON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METD15.040.40
+2.72%
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
VAW237.481.42
+0.60%
Vanguard Materials ETF
SWZ6.090.01
+0.16%
Total Return Securities Inc
RYSE23.99N/A
N/A
Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
SPSK18.14N/A
N/A
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+1.01%
CRDO - ALAB
59%
Loosely correlated
+8.61%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+8.75%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
KLIC - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
More