ALAB
Price
$129.46
Change
+$4.00 (+3.19%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.04B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVDA
Price
$183.91
Change
+$1.83 (+1.01%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.47T
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$9.42
Change
-$0.13 (-1.36%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or NVDA or NVTS

Header iconALAB vs NVDA vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs NVDA vs NVTSBanner chart's image
ALAB vs NVDA vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. NVIDIA (NVDA) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALAB delivered 115% FY2025 revenue growth to $852.5M driven by AI connectivity demand but trades at premium 98x trailing P/E amid recent volatility.
  • NVDA dominates AI GPUs with record $215.9B FY2026 revenue (up 65% YoY) and market cap over $4T, offering scale and stability.
  • NVTS focuses on GaN/SiC power semis for AI data centers, showing strong YTD momentum but remains unprofitable with revenue contraction during strategic pivot.
  • Relative performance: NVTS leads 1Y gains (~300%), NVDA provides consistent momentum, ALAB faces valuation pressures post-earnings.
  • All three benefit from AI infrastructure boom, but NVDA's leadership contrasts with smaller peers' higher growth/risk profiles.
  • Tickeron AI favors NVDA for trend consistency and catalysts in current market.

Introduction

This comparison examines ALAB, NVDA, and NVTS, three semiconductor stocks pivotal to AI infrastructure. ALAB provides connectivity solutions, NVDA leads in GPUs and compute platforms, and NVTS specializes in power management chips. Traders eyeing AI exposure and investors assessing relative performance in data centers will benefit from insights into their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning amid surging demand for cloud and AI hardware. (98 words)

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs (ALAB), a fabless semiconductor firm founded in 2017 and headquartered in San Jose, California, designs connectivity solutions like PCIe, CXL, and Ethernet products for cloud and AI infrastructure. Serving hyperscalers and OEMs, it reported record FY2025 revenue of $852.5 million, up 115% year-over-year, with Q4 at $270.6 million (92% YoY growth). Recent market activity saw shares rally on analyst upgrades and partnerships, including European expansion, though post-earnings declines of ~13% reflected margin concerns and high valuations (trailing P/E ~98x, market cap ~$20B). Sentiment remains positive with targets up to $250, driven by AI rack-scale demand, but volatility persists in broader semis rotation.

NVDA Overview and Recent Performance

NVIDIA (NVDA), headquartered in Santa Clara, California, is a full-stack AI infrastructure leader with segments in compute/networking and graphics. FY2026 revenue hit a record $215.9 billion, up 65% YoY, including Q4 data center sales of $62.3 billion (75% YoY growth). Recent weeks featured Vera Rubin platform announcements and GTC previews, boosting sentiment amid Q1 FY2027 guidance of $78 billion. Shares (~$183, market cap ~$4.5T) showed resilience in sector rotations, with trailing P/E ~37x reflecting dominance in AI GPUs and hyperscaler demand. Export controls to China were offset by robust global AI adoption.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS), based in Torrance, California and founded in 2014, develops GaN and SiC power ICs for AI data centers, EVs, and consumer electronics. Recent product launches like 1200V SiC packages for AI infrastructure drove sharp rallies (~25% on news), alongside a new CFO appointment. However, revenue fell to $45.9M in 2025 amid a pivot from China consumer markets, with Q4 guidance ~$7M. Shares (~$10, market cap ~$2.3B) delivered strong YTD (~53%) and 1Y (~300%) gains on AI power efficiency hype and Nvidia partnerships, though high beta (~3.2) amplifies volatility and profitability remains elusive.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 available, each powered by advanced Financial Learning Models (FLMs). These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, technical/fundamental analysis, and hedging. Optimized for current market volatility, they feature short timeframes (5-60 minutes), with standout performances including annualized returns up to +208%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors to 25.8. Examples: a semiconductors bot at +110% annualized (70% win rate), oil/semi strategies at +91-130%. Ideal for copy trading, this section highlights bots best suited to today’s conditions—explore Trending AI Robots to deploy high-probability signals across styles and sectors. (128 words)

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB, NVDA, and NVTS anchor AI semis but differ sharply: NVDA’s full-stack GPUs/compute enable core AI training/inference, while ALAB focuses on rack-scale connectivity and NVTS on power delivery. Growth drivers favor NVDA’s hyperscaler scale ($216B revenue) over ALAB’s 115% surge and NVTS’s pivot. Momentum: NVTS tops 1Y (~300%), but NVDA leads stability (YTD flat vs. ALAB down ~25%). Risks include ALAB/NVTS high valuations (25x/50x P/S) and competition vs. NVDA’s moat. All share AI data center exposure, but NVDA shows lower beta, NVTS highest volatility. Sentiment leans NVDA for consistency, peers for upside trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors NVDA due to superior trend consistency, massive scale ($4.5T cap), profitability, and catalysts like Vera Rubin/GTC amid AI demand. While ALAB and NVTS offer niche growth in connectivity/power, their volatility and valuations suggest higher risk; NVDA’s relative positioning provides the strongest probabilistic edge in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $129.46NVDA: $183.91NVTS: $9.42)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and NVTS are not notable and NVDA is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 94%, NVDA: 64%, NVTS: 92%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $22.04B, NVDA: $4.47T, NVTS: $2.17B
$ALAB is valued at $22.04B, while NVDA has a market capitalization of $4.47T, and NVTS's market capitalization is $2.17B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $110.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVDA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NVDA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVDA is a better buy in the long-term than ALAB, which in turn is a better option than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVDA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVDA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB and NVDA are a better buy in the short-term than NVTS.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +10.52% price change this week, while NVDA (@Semiconductors) price change was +3.68% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

NVDA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVDA($4.47T) has a higher market cap than ALAB($22B) and NVTS($2.17B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than NVDA and NVTS: ALAB (106.11) vs NVDA (37.53) and NVTS (). NVTS YTD gains are higher at: 31.933 vs. NVDA (-1.383) and ALAB (-22.181). NVDA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145B vs. ALAB (180M) and NVTS (-67.33M). ALAB has less debt than NVTS and NVDA: ALAB (4.15M) vs NVTS (6.47M) and NVDA (11B). NVDA has higher revenues than ALAB and NVTS: NVDA (216B) vs ALAB (853M) and NVTS (45.9M).
ALABNVDANVTS
Capitalization22B4.47T2.17B
EBITDA180M145B-67.33M
Gain YTD-22.181-1.38331.933
P/E Ratio106.1137.53N/A
Revenue853M216B45.9M
Total Cash1.19BN/A237M
Total Debt4.15M11B6.47M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NVDA: Fundamental Ratings
NVDA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABNVDANVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVDA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFX.X0.0518280.001836
+3.67%
Conflux cryptocurrency
GYLD14.220.43
+3.12%
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
TRB.X14.9187050.177933
+1.21%
Tellor cryptocurrency
DENT.X0.0001630.000001
+0.93%
Dent cryptocurrency
ZJUL29.36-0.02
-0.07%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 1Yr Jul

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+3.19%
CRDO - ALAB
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
AVGO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
More

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
-1.36%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
More