ALAB
Price
$174.05
Change
+$3.24 (+1.90%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.63B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$126.93
Change
+$6.90 (+5.75%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.73B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TXN
Price
$229.82
Change
+$6.72 (+3.01%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
209.24B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB or RMBS or TXN

Header iconALAB vs RMBS vs TXN Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs RMBS vs TXNBanner chart's image
ALAB vs RMBS vs TXN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Rambus (RMBS) vs. Texas Instruments (TXN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALAB leads with explosive AI-driven growth, posting record FY2025 revenue of $852.5M (up 115% YoY) but trades at a premium P/E of ~98 amid high volatility (beta 1.75).
  • RMBS shows solid memory IP momentum in AI with HBM4E advancements and record product revenue, yet recent post-earnings pullback reflects valuation concerns.
  • TXN offers stability as an analog giant with Q4 revenue up 10% YoY to $4.42B, but limited direct AI exposure lags peers in growth and YTD performance.
  • ALAB and RMBS exhibit stronger recent momentum tied to AI infrastructure, outperforming TXN's steady but slower industrial/automotive focus.
  • Market caps: TXN (~$179B) dwarfs ALAB (~$20B) and RMBS (~$9.5B), highlighting scale vs. high-growth specialization trade-offs.
  • Semiconductor sector tailwinds favor AI connectivity plays, though volatility and competition pose risks across all three.

Introduction

This comparison examines ALAB, RMBS, and TXN—three semiconductor firms navigating the AI boom and broader chip demand. ALAB and RMBS specialize in high-speed connectivity and memory IP critical for AI data centers, while TXN dominates analog chips for diverse applications. Traders seeking momentum in AI infrastructure or investors prioritizing stability in established plays will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning amid recent earnings beats and sector volatility.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) is a fabless semiconductor firm delivering connectivity solutions like PCIe retimers and CXL for cloud and AI infrastructure. In recent market activity, ALAB reported record Q4 2025 revenue of $270.6M (up 17% QoQ, 92% YoY) and FY2025 revenue of $852.5M (up 115% YoY), fueled by Scorpio fabric ramps and partnerships including a $6.5B Amazon warrant deal. Stock sentiment reflects AI tailwinds, with shares trading around $119 (market cap ~$20B, P/E ~98), though premium valuations and margin pressures from competition have introduced volatility. Broader adoption of PCIe Gen6 and optical initiatives bolsters long-term positioning.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) focuses on high-performance memory interface chips and IP, targeting data-intensive AI systems. Recent quarters highlighted record Q4 product revenue of $96.8M (up 41% YoY annually) and advancements like HBM4E Controller IP for superior AI accelerator performance. Shares, around $88 (market cap ~$9.5B), faced a post-earnings dip amid soft Q1 guidance and valuation scrutiny, despite strong licensing and cash flow ($360M FY2025). Sentiment shifts stem from AI memory demand versus broader sector pressures, with beta reflecting moderate volatility.

TXN Overview and Recent Performance

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) leads in analog and embedded processing chips for industrial, automotive, and consumer markets. In recent activity, Q4 2025 revenue reached $4.42B (up 10% YoY), with analog sales up 15% to $14B annually, supported by Nvidia robotics partnerships. Trading near $193 (market cap ~$179B, P/E ~36, 2.9% yield), TXN's performance reflects steady demand but limited AI direct exposure, leading to relative underperformance versus hyperscaler-focused peers. Free cash flow of $2.94B underscores operational strength amid cyclical recovery.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform, which trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like technical/fundamental analysis, swing trading, trend following, and hedging across timeframes from 5min to 60min. Only bots excelling in current conditions—such as high volatility or sector rotations—earn a spot, with AI scoring highlighting promise. Stats show 40+ featured bots boasting annualized returns up to +218% (e.g., volatility plays), win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors to 25+, outperforming S&P 500 benchmarks in recent months across semiconductors (e.g., +101-113% on LRCX/ASML), aerospace, energy, and small caps. These vary by style, risk management, and tickers like SOXL, AVGO. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify suitable options for today’s markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB and RMBS emphasize AI-specific growth via connectivity/IP, contrasting TXN’s diversified analog base less tied to hyperscalers. Momentum favors ALAB (YTD +28%) on revenue surges versus TXN’s modest gains, with RMBS volatile post-earnings. Risks: ALAB’s high beta (1.75) and P/E (~98) signal sensitivity to AI hype; RMBS faces competition in memory; TXN offers lower volatility but slower growth. Sector exposure aligns all in semis, but ALAB/RMBS ride AI capex while TXN benefits industrials. Valuation trade-off: TXN’s scale yields stability; specialists promise upside.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ALAB for its consistent trend strength in AI connectivity, superior revenue growth, and multi-customer catalysts like Scorpio ramps, positioning it ahead in relative momentum versus RMBS’s memory focus and TXN’s stability. Probabilistic edge stems from observable AI infrastructure demand, though volatility warrants caution.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $174.05RMBS: $126.93TXN: $229.82)
Brand notoriety: ALAB and RMBS are not notable and TXN is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 127%, RMBS: 131%, TXN: 160%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $29.63B, RMBS: $13.73B, TXN: $209.24B
$ALAB is valued at $29.63B, while RMBS has a market capitalization of $13.73B, and TXN's market capitalization is $209.24B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TXN’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TXN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TXN is a better buy in the long-term than RMBS, which in turn is a better option than ALAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TXN’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TXN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TXN is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB and RMBS.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +16.77% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +14.93% , and TXN (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

TXN is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXN($209B) has a higher market cap than ALAB($29.6B) and RMBS($13.7B). ALAB has higher P/E ratio than RMBS and TXN: ALAB (142.66) vs RMBS (60.16) and TXN (42.17). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 38.133 vs. TXN (33.333) and ALAB (4.623). TXN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.25B vs. RMBS (325M) and ALAB (180M). TXN has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. ALAB (1.19B) and RMBS (762M). ALAB has less debt than RMBS and TXN: ALAB (4.15M) vs RMBS (25M) and TXN (14B). TXN has higher revenues than ALAB and RMBS: TXN (17.7B) vs ALAB (853M) and RMBS (708M).
ALABRMBSTXN
Capitalization29.6B13.7B209B
EBITDA180M325M8.25B
Gain YTD4.62338.13333.333
P/E Ratio142.6660.1642.17
Revenue853M708M17.7B
Total Cash1.19B762M4.88B
Total Debt4.15M25M14B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS vs TXN: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
TXN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2048
SMR RATING
1..100
4632
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
378
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TXN's Valuation (14) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBS (79). This means that TXN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TXN (48). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TXN’s over the last 12 months.

TXN's SMR Rating (32) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (46). This means that TXN’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TXN's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (37). This means that TXN’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TXN (25). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TXN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABRMBSTXN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPSX24.641.95
+8.59%
Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF
BIZD13.200.24
+1.85%
VanEck BDC Income ETF
QQA54.000.43
+0.80%
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
HYRM23.350.10
+0.44%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF
TAXX50.670.06
+0.12%
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+1.90%
CRDO - ALAB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
KLIC - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+5.75%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+7.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
More

TXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXN has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TXN jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXN
1D Price
Change %
TXN100%
+3.01%
MCHP - TXN
82%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
MCHPP - TXN
78%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
NXPI - TXN
75%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
ADI - TXN
74%
Closely correlated
+4.99%
ON - TXN
70%
Closely correlated
+3.85%
More