Advertisement
ALB or FUL or HUN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs. H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) vs. Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ALB leads YTD performance at over 37%, driven by lithium demand recovery and strong market positioning in energy storage.
- HUN shows solid YTD gains of about 47%, bolstered by recent Q1 revenue beats and capacity expansions despite reported losses.
- FUL maintains stability with modest YTD returns around 1.6%, supported by dividend increases and global price hikes.
- All three stocks operate in the chemicals sector but diverge in focus: ALB on lithium, FUL on adhesives, and HUN on polyurethanes and specialties.
- Recent price increases across FUL and HUN signal resilience amid supply constraints, while ALB eyes earnings catalysts.
- ALB exhibits higher volatility with recent swings, contrasting FUL's steadier profile.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ALB, FUL, and HUN, three players in the chemicals sector with distinct specialties. Investors tracking materials and industrials may find value in their relative performance amid shifting commodity dynamics and industrial demand. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, valuation sensitivity, and growth drivers, aiding decisions on sector exposure, diversification, or momentum plays in a volatile environment.
ALB Overview and Recent Performance
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is a global leader in lithium production for energy storage, alongside specialties like bromine and catalysts via its Ketjen segment. In recent weeks, ALB shares have shown volatility, with notable surges tied to lithium market optimism and anticipation of upcoming earnings. Year-to-date gains exceed 37%, far outpacing broader indices, fueled by EV battery demand and supply chain positioning. Sentiment has improved on capacity expansions and sector tailwinds, though price swings reflect commodity exposure.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) manufactures adhesives, sealants, and specialty chemicals for hygiene, engineering, and building applications across global markets. Recent market activity for FUL reflects stability, with shares holding steady amid a 10% global price increase due to petrochemical constraints. Healthy earnings and a 4.3% dividend hike have supported modest monthly gains around 3%, with YTD returns near 1.6%. Investor sentiment benefits from consistent demand in end-markets like construction and consumer goods.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) produces diversified chemicals including polyurethanes, amines, and advanced materials for automotive, construction, and electronics. In recent weeks, HUN reported Q1 results with a narrower loss than expected, beating revenue forecasts, and announced price hikes alongside capacity growth in specialty amines. YTD performance stands at about 47%, driven by operating improvements and demand in key segments. Sentiment has firmed on forward guidance, despite ongoing profitability challenges.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current conditions—boasting annualized returns up to 163%, win rates as high as 88%, and profit factors exceeding 11—earn a spot among the 25 featured. These bots employ diverse strategies, from short-term volatility plays to sector-specific momentum in semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and industrials, with performance tracked over 1 to 49 days. Traders can explore real-time signals and copy top performers. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots aligned with today's market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ALB, FUL, and HUN share chemicals sector exposure but differ in models: ALB's commodity lithium ties it to EV cycles, FUL's adhesives emphasize stable industrials, and HUN's polyurethanes balance construction and autos. Growth drivers contrast—ALB via battery demand, FUL through pricing power, HUN on specialties expansion. Recent momentum favors ALB and HUN with strong YTDs, over FUL's steadiness. Risks include lithium volatility for ALB, cyclicality for HUN, and input costs for FUL. Valuation shows FUL at a positive P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of ~21, while others trade without due to losses. Market sentiment leans positive on pricing actions across all.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors ALB with higher probability, owing to its trend consistency, superior YTD momentum, and catalysts in lithium supply for EVs. HUN follows closely on recent operational resilience, while FUL suits stability seekers. Outcomes depend on earnings and sector flows.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and HUN’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- ALB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and HUN’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -11.37% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -5.21% , and HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price fluctuated -8.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALB is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.
HUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.59% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+1.53% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| ALB | FUL | HUN | |
| Capitalization | 21.3B | 3.16B | 2.4B |
| EBITDA | 568M | 541M | 168M |
| Gain YTD | 27.847 | -1.606 | 37.943 |
| P/E Ratio | 33.94 | 20.09 | N/A |
| Revenue | 5.5B | 3.46B | 5.78B |
| Total Cash | 1.09B | 108M | 369M |
| Total Debt | 1.88B | 2.08B | 2.49B |
ALB | FUL | HUN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 62 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 76 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 59 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 80 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (13) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (47) in the Industrial Specialties industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (77) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN's stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s and somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as FUL (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB's stock grew similarly to HUN’s and similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's SMR Rating (76) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is in the same range as HUN (94) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL's stock grew similarly to ALB’s and similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (42) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB's stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s and somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as ALB (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FUL (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HUN's stock grew similarly to ALB’s and significantly faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| ALB | FUL | HUN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 54% | 11 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JOF | 11.64 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund | |||
| TDTT | 24.27 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| FlexShares iBoxx 3Yr Target Dur TIPS ETF | |||
| RIGS | 22.74 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| RiverFront Strategic Income ETF | |||
| RBLY | 13.07 | -0.17 | -1.25% |
| Yieldmax Rblx Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| STHH | 122.03 | -5.51 | -4.32% |
| STMICROELECTRONICS NV ADRHEDGED | |||
ALB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALB has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALB jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.