AMD
Price
$278.39
Change
+$0.13 (+0.05%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
453.87B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$689.89
Change
+$17.25 (+2.56%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.72B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVDA
Price
$201.68
Change
+$3.33 (+1.68%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.9T
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMD or FN or NVDA

Header iconAMD vs FN vs NVDA Comparison
Open Charts AMD vs FN vs NVDABanner chart's image
AMD vs FN vs NVDA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) vs. Fabrinet (FN) vs. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AMD shares have faced pressure in recent weeks amid post-earnings weakness and broader semiconductor volatility, down over 10% year-to-date with a market cap around $314B.
  • FN, a key optical manufacturing player, shows strong longer-term momentum with 158% one-year gains but recent pullbacks, trading near $489 with YTD up 5-7%.
  • NVDA maintains AI leadership with robust data center growth, shares down 3-5% YTD but up 57-66% annually, boasting a $4.3T market cap.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven demand, but FN excels in relative one-year performance while NVDA leads in scale and margins.
  • Recent market activity highlights sector risks from geopolitical tensions and export concerns, impacting short-term sentiment across AMD, FN, and NVDA.
  • Valuations reflect growth expectations: AMD P/E ~73, FN ~44, NVDA ~36.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines AMD, FN, and NVDA amid surging AI and semiconductor demand. These companies play pivotal roles in the ecosystem: AMD and NVDA as chip designers fueling data centers and computing, and FN as a precision manufacturer supporting optical components essential for AI infrastructure. Traders seeking exposure to AI growth, relative performance, and market positioning will find value here, particularly as recent volatility underscores contrasts in momentum, scale, and risk profiles in the current environment.

AMD Overview and Recent Performance

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) designs CPUs, GPUs, and AI accelerators, competing in data centers, PCs, and gaming. Recent market activity has pressured shares, down 3.5% in a session to around $192, with YTD declines exceeding 10% and monthly drops near 11%. Post-Q4 earnings beat, shares sank on modest Q1 guidance amid seasonal client and gaming softness, despite data center strength. Sentiment reflects broader sector concerns like AI export rules and competition, with a P/E of 73 and market cap of $314B. Longer-term, one-year gains top 90%, highlighting resilience in EPYC CPUs and Instinct GPUs.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) specializes in advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing for OEMs in optical communications, data centers, and sensors. Shares recently traded around $489-$564, with one-year returns near 158-196% but short-term volatility including 10% drops. Strong Q2 fiscal 2026 results showed 36% revenue growth to $1.13B, driven by telecom (66% YoY), datacom, and HPC scaling to $150M+ quarterly. Easing supply constraints and AI optics demand boost outlook, with YTD up 5-25% and P/E ~44. Performance ties to clients like NVDA, fueling sentiment amid datacenter expansion.

NVDA Overview and Recent Performance

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) dominates GPUs for AI, gaming, and data centers. Shares hovered near $178, down 3% recently, with YTD -4-5% but one-year gains of 57-66%. Q4 revenue hit $68B (73% YoY), led by data center at $62B, with networking up sharply; Q1 guide $78B. Analysts reinstated top picks amid undervaluation at 18x 2027 EPS, despite export and margin variance risks. At $4.3T market cap and P/E 36, dominance in Blackwell/Rubin platforms sustains leadership.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots scanning thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical, fundamental, short-term (5-60min) to longer horizons—tailored to current volatility and growth sectors like semiconductors and AI infrastructure. Standouts show annualized returns of 14% to 215%, win rates 53-95%, and profit factors up to 25.8, with low drawdowns (e.g., $1,570-$23,000) and high profit-to-drawdown ratios (2.5-22.7). Semiconductor bots like those on SOXL deliver 103-113% returns at 70% win rates, while multi-ticker tech plays exceed 100%. Ideal for today’s market, they adapt dynamically for copy trading. Explore Trending AI Robots to align with conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMD, FN, and NVDA share AI exposure but diverge in models: NVDA leads design/scale (90% AI GPU share, 75% margins), AMD challenges via cost-competitive CPUs/GPUs (7% share), and FN enables via optics manufacturing (35% from NVDA-like clients). Growth drivers: NVDA’s data center dominance vs. FN’s telecom/HPC surge (36% rev growth) and AMD’s EPYC gains. Recent momentum favors FN (158% 1Y) over NVDA (57%) and AMD (92%). Risks: NVDA/AMD export curbs, FN client concentration. Sector ties amplify volatility; NVDA’s lower P/E signals value amid sentiment shifts from geopolitical factors.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward NVDA based on trend consistency in data center dominance, superior scale ($4.3T cap), and catalysts like Rubin platforms, despite short-term YTD softness. FN’s manufacturing momentum offers upside in optics, while AMD trails on recent weakness. Probabilistic edge to NVDA for stability and relative positioning in AI growth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2026
Stock price -- (AMD: $278.39FN: $689.89NVDA: $201.68)
Brand notoriety: AMD and NVDA are notable and FN is not notable
AMD and NVDA are part of the Semiconductors industry, and FN is in the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMD: 143%, FN: 95%, NVDA: 91%
Market capitalization -- AMD: $453.87B, FN: $24.72B, NVDA: $4.9T
$AMD [@Semiconductors] is valued at $453.87B. $NVDA’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $4.9T. $FN [@Electronic Components] has a market capitalization of $ $24.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.9T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $ $185.72B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $122.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $ $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NVDA’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVDA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN and NVDA are a better buy in the long-term than AMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVDA’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVDA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than AMD, which in turn is a better option than NVDA.

Price Growth

AMD (@Semiconductors) experienced а +13.61% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +4.19% , and NVDA (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

NVDA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Components (+4.81% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVDA($4.9T) has a higher market cap than AMD($454B) and FN($24.7B). AMD has higher P/E ratio than FN and NVDA: AMD (106.66) vs FN (66.14) and NVDA (41.16). FN YTD gains are higher at: 51.531 vs. AMD (29.992) and NVDA (8.145). NVDA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145B vs. AMD (7.28B) and FN (466M). NVDA has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. AMD (10.6B) and FN (961M). FN has less debt than AMD and NVDA: FN (4.89M) vs AMD (3.85B) and NVDA (11B). NVDA has higher revenues than AMD and FN: NVDA (216B) vs AMD (34.6B) and FN (3.89B).
AMDFNNVDA
Capitalization454B24.7B4.9T
EBITDA7.28B466M145B
Gain YTD29.99251.5318.145
P/E Ratio106.6666.1441.16
Revenue34.6B3.89B216B
Total Cash10.6B961M62.6B
Total Debt3.85B4.89M11B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMD vs FN vs NVDA: Fundamental Ratings
AMD
FN
NVDA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
484632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3548
SMR RATING
1..100
794613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
33513
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (73) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as AMD (78) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as NVDA (78) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to AMD’s and similarly to NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as NVDA (8) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as AMD (35) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to NVDA’s and similarly to AMD’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's SMR Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for AMD (79) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NVDA's stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s and significantly faster than AMD’s over the last 12 months.

AMD's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NVDA (13) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as FN (35) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that AMD's stock grew similarly to NVDA’s and similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMD (40) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NVDA (43) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew somewhat faster than AMD’s and somewhat faster than NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMDFNNVDA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
76%
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVDA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRFZ50.411.07
+2.17%
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
EMCS41.660.67
+1.64%
Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF
SPXE76.501.01
+1.34%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy
BUFX21.780.10
+0.44%
FT Vest Laddered Enh & Mod Buffer ETF
UCO37.46-4.22
-10.12%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil