AMD
Price
$245.04
Change
+$8.40 (+3.55%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
399.5B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$420.59
Change
-$0.92 (-0.22%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
474.31B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$9.54
Change
+$0.12 (+1.27%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMD or MU or NVTS

Header iconAMD vs MU vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts AMD vs MU vs NVTSBanner chart's image
AMD vs MU vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) vs. Micron Technology (MU) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AMD shares have shown resilience with strong year-over-year gains around 90%, driven by AI data center demand, though recent weeks saw dips amid broader market pressures.
  • MU delivered explosive 1-year returns exceeding 260%, fueled by memory shortages for AI, but experienced sharp post-earnings pullbacks of about 30% in recent market activity.
  • NVTS, a smaller player in power semiconductors, posted over 280% 1-year gains but faces higher volatility with recent declines following a strategic pivot to high-power AI applications.
  • All three benefit from AI tailwinds—AMD in processors/GPUs, MU in memory, and NVTS in GaN/SiC power tech—but differ in scale, stability, and risk profiles.
  • Recent performance highlights trade-offs: established leaders like AMD and MU offer scale, while NVTS provides growth potential in niche electrification markets.
  • Market sentiment reflects AI-driven momentum, tempered by sector rotation and supply dynamics.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines AMD (Advanced Micro Devices), MU (Micron Technology), and NVTS (Navitas Semiconductor), three semiconductor firms capitalizing on artificial intelligence (AI) demand. These companies span processors, memory, and power management solutions critical for data centers and high-performance computing. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term AI exposure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and sector positioning. With AI infrastructure booming, understanding their contrasts in scale, volatility, and catalysts aids informed decision-making in a dynamic market environment.

AMD Overview and Recent Performance

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) designs high-performance processors, GPUs, and AI accelerators for data centers, client devices, and gaming. Its EPYC CPUs and Instinct GPUs power hyperscale AI workloads, bolstered by partnerships like Samsung for next-gen memory and Meta for GPU deployments.

In recent market activity, AMD shares dipped about 3% in a session amid broader pressures but hold year-to-date declines around 8-10%, with 1-year returns near 90%. Q4 revenue hit $10.27 billion, up 34% year-over-year, driven by data center strength, though shares traded lower post-report due to competition concerns. Sentiment remains positive on AI GPU ramps and earnings growth projections of over 30%, supporting relative outperformance versus the S&P 500.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology (MU) is a leading provider of DRAM, NAND, and storage solutions, with high-bandwidth memory (HBM) pivotal for AI training. Its products serve data centers, mobile, and automotive segments, highlighted by HBM4 production for NVIDIA systems and PCIe Gen6 SSDs.

Recent weeks brought volatility for MU, with shares cratering nearly 30% post-Q2 earnings despite record revenue of $23.86 billion (up significantly year-over-year) and EPS beating estimates. A 10% single-day drop reflected concerns over memory pricing softness, though year-to-date gains hover around 10-13% and 1-year returns top 260%. AI demand and supply tightness underpin sentiment, with Q3 guidance pointing to further records.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) specializes in gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) power ICs for efficient conversion in AI data centers, EVs, and infrastructure. Its GeneSiC platform targets high-voltage applications, with new launches like 650V GaN and SiCPAK modules.

In recent market activity, NVTS shares fluctuated sharply, down 8-18% over short periods amid a "Navitas 2.0" pivot to high-power AI and grid markets, which drove over 50% of Q4 revenue despite a 59% year-over-year decline to $7.3 million. Year-to-date returns are mixed around 4-16%, but 1-year gains exceed 280%, fueled by AI data center sampling and partnerships like GlobalFoundries. Volatility reflects execution risks in its growth transition.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, optimized for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical, fundamental, or hybrid—spanning timeframes like 60-minute, 15-minute, and 5-minute charts, with adaptations for low, medium, or high volatility. Selected by AI analysis for current market conditions, they target outperformance through real-time signals, risk management in virtual agents, or brokerage execution. While specifics vary by bot, the platform emphasizes those showing strong recent potential across industries, including tech and semiconductors. Traders can filter by asset class or style to match portfolios. Explore Trending AI Robots to leverage these tools for enhanced decision-making.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMD and MU dominate with established data center exposure—processors/GPUs versus memory—yielding massive scale and AI catalysts, contrasting NVTS’ niche in power efficiency for electrification. Growth drivers diverge: AMD benefits from EPYC/Instinct ramps, MU from HBM shortages, and NVTS from GaN/SiC adoption in grids/AI infrastructure.

Recent momentum favors MU’s explosive returns but with post-earnings risks; AMD offers steadier trends; NVTS highest volatility. Risk factors include cyclical memory pricing for MU, competition for AMD, and execution for NVTS. All share semiconductor/AI sector exposure, but AMD/MU show lower valuation sensitivity versus NVTS’ premium multiples. Sentiment tilts toward proven leaders amid trade-offs in stability versus upside.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors AMD for its balanced trend consistency, data center stability, and relative positioning versus peers. Observable factors like 34% revenue growth, AI partnerships, and outperformance potential (analyst targets implying upside) position it probabilistically stronger amid sector volatility, though MU’s memory catalysts and NVTS’ niche growth warrant monitoring.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (AMD: $245.04MU: $420.59NVTS: $9.54)
Brand notoriety: AMD and MU are notable and NVTS is not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMD: 132%, MU: 87%, NVTS: 84%
Market capitalization -- AMD: $399.5B, MU: $474.31B, NVTS: $2.2B
$AMD is valued at $399.5B, while MU has a market capitalization of $474.31B, and NVTS's market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.58T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $113.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than AMD and NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMD and MU are a better buy in the short-term than NVTS.

Price Growth

AMD (@Semiconductors) experienced а +12.66% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +14.84% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +8.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($474B) has a higher market cap than AMD($399B) and NVTS($2.2B). AMD has higher P/E ratio than MU and NVTS: AMD (93.89) vs MU (19.85) and NVTS (). MU YTD gains are higher at: 47.425 vs. NVTS (33.613) and AMD (14.419). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1B vs. AMD (7.28B) and NVTS (-67.33M). AMD has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. MU (8.44B) and NVTS (237M). NVTS has less debt than AMD and MU: NVTS (6.47M) vs AMD (3.85B) and MU (12.4B). MU has higher revenues than AMD and NVTS: MU (58.1B) vs AMD (34.6B) and NVTS (45.9M).
AMDMUNVTS
Capitalization399B474B2.2B
EBITDA7.28B37.1B-67.33M
Gain YTD14.41947.42533.613
P/E Ratio93.8919.85N/A
Revenue34.6B58.1B45.9M
Total Cash10.6B8.44B237M
Total Debt3.85B12.4B6.47M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMD vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
AMD
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4118
SMR RATING
1..100
7817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (51) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMD (77). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMD’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMD (41). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMD’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMD (78). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMD’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMD (6). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMD’s over the last 12 months.

MU's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMD (55). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMDMUNVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JERSX12.90N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate S
PTMCX18.15N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Cor Eq C
JVLIX26.34N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value I
FKASX43.73N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
JVSNX16.15N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value N

AMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMD
1D Price
Change %
AMD100%
+3.55%
LRCX - AMD
75%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
KLAC - AMD
71%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FORM - AMD
71%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
ENTG - AMD
71%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
AMAT - AMD
70%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More