APH
Price
$124.99
Change
-$2.88 (-2.25%)
Updated
May 13, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
157.31B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLW
Price
$198.24
Change
-$9.15 (-4.41%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
170.61B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JBL
Price
$350.80
Change
-$14.44 (-3.95%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.01B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH or GLW or JBL

Header iconAPH vs GLW vs JBL Comparison
Open Charts APH vs GLW vs JBLBanner chart's image
APH vs GLW vs JBL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs. Corning Incorporated (GLW) vs. Jabil Inc. (JBL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • APH delivered record Q1 2026 sales of $7.6 billion, up 58% year-over-year, driven by AI demand and acquisitions, though shares have moderated recently.
  • GLW boasts explosive YTD gains of 85%, fueled by AI partnerships like NVIDIA and Meta, with Q1 revenue at $4.34 billion.
  • JBL shares surged 27.5% in recent weeks to a 52-week high near $350, supported by AI data center transceivers and strong projected earnings growth.
  • All three benefit from AI infrastructure tailwinds, but GLW leads in momentum while APH offers relative stability; valuations vary with GLW at 78x P/E versus JBL's 45x.
  • Recent market volatility highlights sector exposure risks, yet book-to-bill ratios and order growth signal sustained demand across connectors, optics, and manufacturing services.

Introduction

This comparison examines APH, GLW, and JBL, three key players in the electronics and interconnect supply chain benefiting from AI-driven data center expansion and tech hardware demand. Amphenol specializes in connectors, Corning in optical materials, and Jabil in manufacturing services. Traders seeking momentum in high-growth sectors and investors eyeing relative performance in electronic components will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories, valuations, and catalysts amid broader market positioning.

APH Overview and Recent Performance

Amphenol Corporation (APH) designs and manufactures electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors, serving harsh environment, communications, and sensor applications across automotive, aerospace, and IT markets. In recent market activity, shares traded around $137 after peaking near $167, reflecting a YTD return of about 1% but 72% over one year. Q1 2026 marked record sales of $7.62 billion, up 58% year-over-year (33% organic), with adjusted EPS at $1.06, boosted by AI demand and the CommScope acquisition. A book-to-bill ratio of 1.24:1 underscores order strength, though elevated debt at $18.7 billion tempers sentiment. Analysts maintain overweight ratings with targets around $182.

GLW Overview and Recent Performance

Corning Incorporated (GLW) produces specialty glass, ceramics, and optical fiber for displays, telecom, and AI data centers. Shares have rallied sharply to around $163 (pre-market higher), with YTD gains of 85% and 262% over one year, from a 52-week low near $44. Recent weeks saw volatility post-Q1 earnings of $4.34 billion in core sales (up 18%) and EPS of $0.70, alongside AI deals with NVIDIA for U.S. manufacturing and Meta for fiber optics. These catalysts have driven sentiment, expanding optical connectivity capacity amid data center growth. Trading at a premium P/E of 78, analysts project targets near $163.

JBL Overview and Recent Performance

Jabil Inc. (JBL) provides engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions for electronics in regulated industries, infrastructure, and digital commerce. Shares hit a 52-week high of $353 before settling near $337, up 48% YTD and 125% annually, with a 27.5% rise in recent weeks. Momentum stems from AI data center partnerships, like Sivers Semiconductors for 1.6T transceivers, and anticipation for Q3 earnings showing EPS/revenue growth. Operating across diverse sectors reduces cyclical risks, supporting a P/E of 45. Analyst targets average $311, with buys intact.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots are selected by AI analysis for superior adaptation to current market volatility, featuring diverse strategies like trend trading, multi-ticker portfolios, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors on timeframes from 5 to 60 minutes. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 169%, win rates to 88%, and profit factors exceeding 7. Top examples: a volatility agent on USAR/SMR/CIFR at 169% return (75% win rate), a 15-minute Alphabet ETF bot at 134% (69% win rate), and a semiconductor multi-ticker at 95% (63% win rate). Explore these for potential edges in dynamic conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

APH, GLW, and JBL share AI supply chain exposure but diverge in models: APH's connectors offer diversified harsh-environment stability (ROE 37%, debt/equity 1.33), GLW's passive optics ride data center hype (highest momentum but 78x P/E, elevated EV/EBITDA), and JBL's EMS provides scalable growth (45x P/E, lower market cap $36B). Recent momentum favors GLW and JBL, yet APH leads earnings scale ($7.6B Q1 sales). Risks include APH's debt post-acquisitions, GLW's valuation stretch, and JBL's cyclical manufacturing. Sentiment tilts positive on AI catalysts, with sector overlaps amplifying relative performance trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors GLW due to superior recent momentum, explosive YTD returns, and high-profile AI infrastructure partnerships signaling trend consistency and catalysts. While JBL shows strong positioning and APH offers stability, GLW's relative outperformance in data center optics edges it probabilistically in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (APH: $127.87GLW: $198.24JBL: $350.80)
Brand notoriety: APH and JBL are not notable and GLW is notable
The three companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 156%, GLW: 188%, JBL: 115%
Market capitalization -- APH: $157.31B, GLW: $170.61B, JBL: $37.01B
$APH is valued at $157.31B, while GLW has a market capitalization of $170.61B, and JBL's market capitalization is $37.01B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electronic Components ranges from $170.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electronic Components industry is $12.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and JBL’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBL is a better buy in the long-term than GLW, which in turn is a better option than APH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and JBL’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JBL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the short-term than GLW, which in turn is a better option than JBL.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -6.45% price change this week, while GLW (@Electronic Components) price change was +22.29% , and JBL (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated +4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

GLW is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

JBL is expected to report earnings on Jun 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+3.17% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($171B) has a higher market cap than APH($157B) and JBL($37B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than JBL and APH: GLW (95.31) vs JBL (47.28) and APH (36.74). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 126.827 vs. JBL (53.894) and APH (-5.193). APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.96B vs. GLW (4.07B) and JBL (1.99B). APH has more cash in the bank: 4.58B vs. JBL (1.83B) and GLW (1.76B). JBL has less debt than GLW and APH: JBL (4.39B) vs GLW (9.92B) and APH (18.7B). JBL has higher revenues than APH and GLW: JBL (32.7B) vs APH (25.9B) and GLW (16.3B).
APHGLWJBL
Capitalization157B171B37B
EBITDA7.96B4.07B1.99B
Gain YTD-5.193126.82753.894
P/E Ratio36.7495.3147.28
Revenue25.9B16.3B32.7B
Total Cash4.58B1.76B1.83B
Total Debt18.7B9.92B4.39B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs GLW vs JBL: Fundamental Ratings
APH
GLW
JBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
662085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2453
SMR RATING
1..100
255418
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
624325
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APH's Valuation (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (75) and is in the same range as GLW (79). This means that APH's stock grew similarly to JBL’s and similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (5) and is in the same range as APH (24). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's SMR Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (25) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (54). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to APH’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (7) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (61). This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JBL’s and somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (43) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (62). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHGLWJBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPRE52.270.10
+0.19%
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
JJETF8.00N/A
N/A
Barclays Bank PLC
EVYM50.34-0.10
-0.21%
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF
FESM44.16-0.52
-1.16%
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
IQM112.71-1.57
-1.37%
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-4.41%
APH - GLW
69%
Closely correlated
+4.41%
FLEX - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-3.71%
FN - GLW
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
TEL - GLW
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.69%
JBL - GLW
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
More

JBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBL has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JBL jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBL
1D Price
Change %
JBL100%
-3.95%
FLEX - JBL
74%
Closely correlated
-3.71%
FN - JBL
67%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
BHE - JBL
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
TTMI - JBL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
CLS - JBL
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More