This comparison examines APH, GLW, and JBL, three key players in the electronics and interconnect supply chain benefiting from AI-driven data center expansion and tech hardware demand. Amphenol specializes in connectors, Corning in optical materials, and Jabil in manufacturing services. Traders seeking momentum in high-growth sectors and investors eyeing relative performance in electronic components will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories, valuations, and catalysts amid broader market positioning.
Amphenol Corporation (APH) designs and manufactures electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors, serving harsh environment, communications, and sensor applications across automotive, aerospace, and IT markets. In recent market activity, shares traded around $137 after peaking near $167, reflecting a YTD return of about 1% but 72% over one year. Q1 2026 marked record sales of $7.62 billion, up 58% year-over-year (33% organic), with adjusted EPS at $1.06, boosted by AI demand and the CommScope acquisition. A book-to-bill ratio of 1.24:1 underscores order strength, though elevated debt at $18.7 billion tempers sentiment. Analysts maintain overweight ratings with targets around $182.
Corning Incorporated (GLW) produces specialty glass, ceramics, and optical fiber for displays, telecom, and AI data centers. Shares have rallied sharply to around $163 (pre-market higher), with YTD gains of 85% and 262% over one year, from a 52-week low near $44. Recent weeks saw volatility post-Q1 earnings of $4.34 billion in core sales (up 18%) and EPS of $0.70, alongside AI deals with NVIDIA for U.S. manufacturing and Meta for fiber optics. These catalysts have driven sentiment, expanding optical connectivity capacity amid data center growth. Trading at a premium P/E of 78, analysts project targets near $163.
Jabil Inc. (JBL) provides engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions for electronics in regulated industries, infrastructure, and digital commerce. Shares hit a 52-week high of $353 before settling near $337, up 48% YTD and 125% annually, with a 27.5% rise in recent weeks. Momentum stems from AI data center partnerships, like Sivers Semiconductors for 1.6T transceivers, and anticipation for Q3 earnings showing EPS/revenue growth. Operating across diverse sectors reduces cyclical risks, supporting a P/E of 45. Analyst targets average $311, with buys intact.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots are selected by AI analysis for superior adaptation to current market volatility, featuring diverse strategies like trend trading, multi-ticker portfolios, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors on timeframes from 5 to 60 minutes. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 169%, win rates to 88%, and profit factors exceeding 7. Top examples: a volatility agent on USAR/SMR/CIFR at 169% return (75% win rate), a 15-minute Alphabet ETF bot at 134% (69% win rate), and a semiconductor multi-ticker at 95% (63% win rate). Explore these for potential edges in dynamic conditions.
APH, GLW, and JBL share AI supply chain exposure but diverge in models: APH's connectors offer diversified harsh-environment stability (ROE 37%, debt/equity 1.33), GLW's passive optics ride data center hype (highest momentum but 78x P/E, elevated EV/EBITDA), and JBL's EMS provides scalable growth (45x P/E, lower market cap $36B). Recent momentum favors GLW and JBL, yet APH leads earnings scale ($7.6B Q1 sales). Risks include APH's debt post-acquisitions, GLW's valuation stretch, and JBL's cyclical manufacturing. Sentiment tilts positive on AI catalysts, with sector overlaps amplifying relative performance trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors GLW due to superior recent momentum, explosive YTD returns, and high-profile AI infrastructure partnerships signaling trend consistency and catalysts. While JBL shows strong positioning and APH offers stability, GLW's relative outperformance in data center optics edges it probabilistically in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and JBL’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and JBL’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -6.45% price change this week, while GLW (@Electronic Components) price change was +22.29% , and JBL (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated +4.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.29%.
APH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
GLW is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
JBL is expected to report earnings on Jun 18, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| APH | GLW | JBL | |
| Capitalization | 157B | 171B | 37B |
| EBITDA | 7.96B | 4.07B | 1.99B |
| Gain YTD | -5.193 | 126.827 | 53.894 |
| P/E Ratio | 36.74 | 95.31 | 47.28 |
| Revenue | 25.9B | 16.3B | 32.7B |
| Total Cash | 4.58B | 1.76B | 1.83B |
| Total Debt | 18.7B | 9.92B | 4.39B |
APH | GLW | JBL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 20 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 5 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 54 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 3 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 43 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APH's Valuation (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (75) and is in the same range as GLW (79). This means that APH's stock grew similarly to JBL’s and similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (5) and is in the same range as APH (24). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's SMR Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (25) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (54). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to APH’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (7) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (61). This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to JBL’s and somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (43) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (62). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.
| APH | GLW | JBL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 15 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBL has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JBL jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | 100% | -3.95% | ||
| FLEX - JBL | 74% Closely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| FN - JBL | 67% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| BHE - JBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| TTMI - JBL | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CLS - JBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||