Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO), Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL), and TPG Inc. (TPG) are leading alternative asset managers specializing in private credit, equity, and real assets. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment that favors credit strategies. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing scale and fee generation will find value in understanding their relative strengths amid shifting sentiment in private markets.
Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is a global alternative asset manager with $938 billion in total AUM, including $709 billion in fee-earning assets, emphasizing credit, private equity, and real assets. In recent market activity, APO shares have stabilized around $130, reflecting YTD gains of about 9.5% despite broader sector volatility. Key influences include a $225 million investment in Pickleball Inc. via Apollo Sports Capital and anticipation for Q1 earnings, where analysts project EPS of $1.98. Strong credit deployment and scale have bolstered sentiment, though shares remain below 52-week highs amid rate sensitivity.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) manages $315 billion in AUM across credit, GP strategic capital, and real assets, targeting middle-market lending and minority stakes. Shares have surged recently to near $10 following a Q1 earnings beat, with revenue of $700 million and EPS of $0.19 exceeding estimates, driving YTD gains of 32%. AUM grew 15% to $314.9 billion, aided by SpaceX stake gains, though earlier redemption restrictions in private credit funds pressured sentiment in recent weeks. Recovery reflects resilient fundraising and deployment.
TPG Inc. (TPG) oversees $306 billion in AUM through private equity, real estate, and credit strategies, with a focus on global deployment. Trading around $44, shares posted YTD returns of nearly 30%, supported by $14.4 billion in Q1 capital deployment across segments. Despite mixed Q1 results showing modest net losses, revenue hit $557 million and dry powder stands at $73 billion, fueling optimism. Recent weeks' gains stem from diversification and fundraising momentum, countering prior sector-wide dips from credit concerns.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 available, curated for current market conditions like volatility in tech and infrastructure. These bots trade stocks, ETFs, and crypto with impressive stats: annualized returns from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in some cases. Strategies vary from swing trading dips to momentum in semiconductors and space, with average trades spanning 1 day to 49 days across diverse tickers. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge amid dynamic conditions.
APO, OWL, and TPG share alternative asset models heavy in private credit (50-70% of AUM), but APO differentiates via massive scale and Athene insurance integration for stable fees. Growth drivers include fundraising: all expanded AUM 15%+ recently, though OWL and TPG show stronger YTD momentum from earnings catalysts. Risks tilt higher for smaller peers amid redemption gates, with OWL most exposed to private credit scrutiny. Valuation sensitivity favors APO's lower forward P/E; sentiment favors momentum in OWL/TPG despite volatility trade-offs.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward APO for its trend consistency, dominant AUM scale generating reliable fees, and near-term catalysts like Q1 earnings. While OWL and TPG exhibit stronger short-term momentum, APO's stability and positioning suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in a maturing credit cycle.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TPG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TPG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.64% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.31% , and TPG (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -5.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.97%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
TPG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | OWL | TPG | |
| Capitalization | 78B | 6.39B | 6.7B |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 951M | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -6.098 | -33.905 | -32.823 |
| P/E Ratio | 85.14 | 78.83 | 181.65 |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 2.94B | 3.04B |
| Total Cash | 253B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 3.86B | 1.81B |
APO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APO | OWL | TPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 12 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.