APO
Price
$135.38
Change
-$0.14 (-0.10%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
78.05B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$9.46
Change
-$0.35 (-3.57%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.39B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPG
Price
$41.79
Change
-$1.46 (-3.38%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.7B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO or OWL or TPG

Header iconAPO vs OWL vs TPG Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWL vs TPGBanner chart's image
APO vs OWL vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs. Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) vs. TPG Inc. (TPG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) leads with $938 billion in assets under management (AUM), dwarfing Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) at $315 billion and TPG Inc. (TPG) at $306 billion, offering unmatched scale.
  • OWL and TPG have outperformed year-to-date (YTD) with gains around 30-32%, compared to APO's 9.5%, amid private credit momentum.
  • Recent earnings beats for OWL and deployment strength for TPG highlight growth, while APO eyes Q1 results.
  • All three firms focus on alternative assets like private credit and equity, benefiting from higher interest rates but facing redemption pressures in volatile periods.
  • APO trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 14.2x, more attractive than peers' elevated trailing multiples amid growth expectations.

Introduction

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO), Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL), and TPG Inc. (TPG) are leading alternative asset managers specializing in private credit, equity, and real assets. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment that favors credit strategies. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing scale and fee generation will find value in understanding their relative strengths amid shifting sentiment in private markets.

APO Overview and Recent Performance

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is a global alternative asset manager with $938 billion in total AUM, including $709 billion in fee-earning assets, emphasizing credit, private equity, and real assets. In recent market activity, APO shares have stabilized around $130, reflecting YTD gains of about 9.5% despite broader sector volatility. Key influences include a $225 million investment in Pickleball Inc. via Apollo Sports Capital and anticipation for Q1 earnings, where analysts project EPS of $1.98. Strong credit deployment and scale have bolstered sentiment, though shares remain below 52-week highs amid rate sensitivity.

OWL Overview and Recent Performance

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) manages $315 billion in AUM across credit, GP strategic capital, and real assets, targeting middle-market lending and minority stakes. Shares have surged recently to near $10 following a Q1 earnings beat, with revenue of $700 million and EPS of $0.19 exceeding estimates, driving YTD gains of 32%. AUM grew 15% to $314.9 billion, aided by SpaceX stake gains, though earlier redemption restrictions in private credit funds pressured sentiment in recent weeks. Recovery reflects resilient fundraising and deployment.

TPG Overview and Recent Performance

TPG Inc. (TPG) oversees $306 billion in AUM through private equity, real estate, and credit strategies, with a focus on global deployment. Trading around $44, shares posted YTD returns of nearly 30%, supported by $14.4 billion in Q1 capital deployment across segments. Despite mixed Q1 results showing modest net losses, revenue hit $557 million and dry powder stands at $73 billion, fueling optimism. Recent weeks' gains stem from diversification and fundraising momentum, countering prior sector-wide dips from credit concerns.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 available, curated for current market conditions like volatility in tech and infrastructure. These bots trade stocks, ETFs, and crypto with impressive stats: annualized returns from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in some cases. Strategies vary from swing trading dips to momentum in semiconductors and space, with average trades spanning 1 day to 49 days across diverse tickers. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge amid dynamic conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

APO, OWL, and TPG share alternative asset models heavy in private credit (50-70% of AUM), but APO differentiates via massive scale and Athene insurance integration for stable fees. Growth drivers include fundraising: all expanded AUM 15%+ recently, though OWL and TPG show stronger YTD momentum from earnings catalysts. Risks tilt higher for smaller peers amid redemption gates, with OWL most exposed to private credit scrutiny. Valuation sensitivity favors APO's lower forward P/E; sentiment favors momentum in OWL/TPG despite volatility trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently leans toward APO for its trend consistency, dominant AUM scale generating reliable fees, and near-term catalysts like Q1 earnings. While OWL and TPG exhibit stronger short-term momentum, APO's stability and positioning suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in a maturing credit cycle.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $135.38OWL: $9.46TPG: $41.78)
Brand notoriety: APO, OWL and TPG are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 70%, OWL: 47%, TPG: 51%
Market capitalization -- APO: $78.05B, OWL: $6.39B, TPG: $6.7B
$APO is valued at $78.05B, while OWL has a market capitalization of $6.39B, and TPG's market capitalization is $6.7B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $7.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TPG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than TPG, which in turn is a better option than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TPG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than TPG, which in turn is a better option than OWL.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.64% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.31% , and TPG (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

TPG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.59% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($78B) has a higher market cap than TPG($6.7B) and OWL($6.39B). TPG has higher P/E ratio than APO and OWL: TPG (181.65) vs APO (85.14) and OWL (78.83). APO YTD gains are higher at: -6.098 vs. TPG (-32.823) and OWL (-33.905). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.72B vs. OWL (951M) and TPG (). TPG has less debt than OWL and APO: TPG (1.81B) vs OWL (3.86B) and APO (14.2B). APO has higher revenues than TPG and OWL: APO (31.5B) vs TPG (3.04B) and OWL (2.94B).
APOOWLTPG
Capitalization78B6.39B6.7B
EBITDA7.72B951MN/A
Gain YTD-6.098-33.905-32.823
P/E Ratio85.1478.83181.65
Revenue31.5B2.94B3.04B
Total Cash253BN/AN/A
Total Debt14.2B3.86B1.81B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWLTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAAVX14.12N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Assets R6
MSEPX15.93N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts C
EWMCX42.52N/A
N/A
Evercore Equity
CCWSX20.59N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua International Gr Inv
RWMCX66.66-0.72
-1.07%
American Funds Washington Mutual R3

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-0.10%
KKR - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
BX - APO
76%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
ARES - APO
75%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
TPG - APO
74%
Closely correlated
-3.40%
OWL - APO
73%
Closely correlated
-3.57%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
-3.40%
CG - TPG
79%
Closely correlated
-4.02%
KKR - TPG
79%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
ARES - TPG
77%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
BX - TPG
74%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
APO - TPG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
More