ARM
Price
$149.79
Change
+$0.88 (+0.59%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
159.08B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INTC
Price
$61.72
Change
+$2.77 (+4.70%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
309.9B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$421.51
Change
+$14.78 (+3.63%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
475.35B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARM or INTC or MU

Header iconARM vs INTC vs MU Comparison
Open Charts ARM vs INTC vs MUBanner chart's image
ARM vs INTC vs MU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Arm Holdings (ARM) vs. Intel (INTC) vs. Micron Technology (MU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MU leads with explosive YTD gains of around 49%, driven by AI memory demand, outpacing INTC at 24% and ARM at about 6%.
  • ARM shows 26% revenue growth from AI and data centers but faces profitability pressures with a 12% net income drop and high P/E over 150.
  • INTC exhibits recovery momentum with recent advances amid manufacturing reviews and leadership changes, though governance lawsuits add uncertainty.
  • MU benefits from high-bandwidth memory shortages and strong earnings outlook, while ARM and INTC grapple with valuation and execution risks.
  • Semiconductor sector rotation favors memory plays like MU over design (ARM) and foundry (INTC) in recent market activity.

Introduction

In the semiconductor sector, ARM, INTC, and MU represent diverse approaches to the AI-driven chip boom. Arm Holdings designs energy-efficient architectures powering mobile and data center chips, Intel focuses on manufacturing and CPUs with foundry ambitions, and Micron excels in memory solutions critical for AI training. Traders seeking momentum in AI infrastructure and investors eyeing relative performance in volatile tech will find this comparison valuable, highlighting recent price behavior, growth drivers, and sector dynamics amid ongoing demand for advanced computing.

ARM Overview and Recent Performance

Arm Holdings plc (ARM) licenses processor IP central to smartphones, servers, and AI accelerators. Recent market activity has seen shares trade around $115-120, reflecting a pullback with 1-month declines near 8% and YTD gains of roughly 6%. Revenue grew 26% year-over-year, fueled by AI and data center demand, but a 12% net income drop amid elevated valuations and investigations into international deals has tempered sentiment. High P/E ratios over 150 signal growth expectations, yet profitability concerns and share price volatility underscore risks in its licensing model during broader sector rotations.

INTC Overview and Recent Performance

Intel Corporation (INTC) dominates x86 CPUs and is expanding foundry services for AI and edge computing. Shares hover near $46, with YTD performance up about 24% amid a recovery from prior lows. Recent weeks featured advances like 2-3% daily gains outpacing the S&P 500, alongside CEO reviews of 18A manufacturing tech for external clients and board changes. However, a shareholder lawsuit over a U.S. government equity stake raises governance questions. Momentum builds on turnaround efforts, though execution in competitive AI chip markets remains key to sustained relative performance.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) produces DRAM and NAND for data centers and AI applications. Trading around $426, the stock has surged with 5%+ daily moves and YTD gains exceeding 49%, far outpacing peers. Recent activity shows 3-month rises over 80%, driven by AI high-bandwidth memory demand and supply constraints. Earnings anticipation highlights robust growth, with revenue projections up significantly year-over-year. Geopolitical expansions like Taiwan fabs bolster positioning, though overvaluation risks persist amid explosive momentum in memory sector exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, volatility plays, and sector rotation, with timeframes from intraday to multi-week holds. Standouts show annualized returns up to 210%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5, including semiconductor-focused agents on tickers like SOXL and MPWR achieving 85-102% returns with 67-71% win rates. Only the most suitable for market volatility earn a spot, offering copy trading via signal, virtual, or brokerage agents. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your strategy across AI-driven sectors.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ARM’s IP licensing yields high margins but cyclical royalties contrast INTC’s capital-intensive foundry pivot and MU’s memory cycles tied to data center hyperscalers. Growth drivers favor MU’s AI memory surge over ARM’s architecture penetration and INTC’s CPU recovery. Recent momentum crowns MU with triple-digit 3-month gains, versus INTC’s steady climb and ARM’s stagnation. Risks include ARM’s lofty valuations, INTC’s governance issues and execution hurdles, and MU’s supply volatility. All share AI exposure, but MU leads in sector tailwinds, while INTC offers turnaround value and ARM premium growth sensitivity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor MU for its superior trend consistency, explosive momentum from AI memory catalysts, and relative positioning in semiconductor rotations. Observable factors like 49% YTD gains, high win-rate bots in memory plays, and supply-driven stability give it probabilistic edge over ARM’s valuation strains and INTC’s turnaround uncertainties, though sector breadth supports monitoring all three.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ARM: $149.79INTC: $61.72MU: $421.51)
Brand notoriety: INTC and MU are notable and ARM is not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARM: 88%, INTC: 210%, MU: 102%
Market capitalization -- ARM: $159.08B, INTC: $309.9B, MU: $475.35B
$ARM is valued at $159.08B, while INTC has a market capitalization of $309.9B, and MU's market capitalization is $475.35B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $110.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MU’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ARM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than ARM, which in turn is a better option than INTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MU’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the short-term than INTC, which in turn is a better option than ARM.

Price Growth

ARM (@Semiconductors) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while INTC (@Semiconductors) price change was +22.51% , and MU (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +15.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARM is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.

INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($475B) has a higher market cap than INTC($310B) and ARM($159B). INTC has higher P/E ratio than ARM and MU: INTC (904.17) vs ARM (199.73) and MU (19.89). INTC YTD gains are higher at: 67.263 vs. MU (47.748) and ARM (37.037). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1B vs. INTC (14.4B) and ARM (1.11B). INTC has more cash in the bank: 37.4B vs. MU (8.44B) and ARM (3.54B). ARM has less debt than MU and INTC: ARM (461M) vs MU (12.4B) and INTC (46.6B). MU has higher revenues than INTC and ARM: MU (58.1B) vs INTC (52.9B) and ARM (4.67B).
ARMINTCMU
Capitalization159B310B475B
EBITDA1.11B14.4B37.1B
Gain YTD37.03767.26347.748
P/E Ratio199.73904.1719.89
Revenue4.67B52.9B58.1B
Total Cash3.54B37.4B8.44B
Total Debt461M46.6B12.4B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTC vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
INTC
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2969
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9018
SMR RATING
1..100
8917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (52) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (96). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (90). This means that MU’s stock grew significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (89). This means that MU’s stock grew significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as INTC (2). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (86). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARMINTCMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTGD29.500.51
+1.75%
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
XTJL39.730.21
+0.53%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul
IWF445.212.06
+0.46%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
PAUG43.750.13
+0.30%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BufferETFAug
KBA31.03N/A
N/A
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF

ARM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARM
1D Price
Change %
ARM100%
+0.59%
LRCX - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
KLAC - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AMAT - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
FORM - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
TSM - ARM
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More

INTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTC
1D Price
Change %
INTC100%
+4.70%
LRCX - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
AMAT - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
KLIC - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.14%
FORM - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
VECO - INTC
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+3.63%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+6.14%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
More