This stock comparison examines ARM, MTSI, and TSEM, three semiconductor firms riding the AI infrastructure wave. ARM dominates IP licensing for energy-efficient designs, while MTSI and TSEM focus on analog solutions and specialty foundry services critical for data centers, telecom, and edge computing. Traders seeking exposure to AI-driven growth and investors tracking relative performance in volatile markets will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and sector positioning. This overview draws on market data to highlight contrasts in valuation, catalysts, and risk profiles.
Arm Holdings plc (ARM) designs and licenses central processing unit architectures powering smartphones, servers, and AI applications. In recent market activity, shares have pulled back from peaks near $183, trading around $116 with a $123B market cap and YTD gain of 4%. Revenue grew 26% in the latest quarter to $1.24B, driven by doubled AI data center royalties, but net income dipped amid profitability pressures. Sentiment reflects AI demand supporting partnerships in edge computing and acquisitions like DreamBig for AI networking, offset by high 154x P/E, beta of 4.13, and investigations into past deals. Broader adoption in PCs and servers influences price behavior, with analysts noting elevated valuations versus peers.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) develops analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, and optical applications in telecom, defense, and data centers. Recent weeks saw volatility with shares around $218, up 27% YTD and 109% over one year, backed by a $16B market cap. Q4 revenue hit $272M (up 25% YoY), with guidance beating estimates on AI optical demand; the firm launched PCIe 7.0 equalizers and prepped for OFC 2026 demos. At 99x P/E and beta 1.46, performance stems from carrier infrastructure and multi-market growth, though pullbacks alongside peers like Applied Materials highlight sector risks. Strong earnings and analyst target hikes to $240 sustain positive momentum.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) operates as an independent foundry specializing in analog/mixed-signal ICs for automotive, medical, and AI uses. Shares rallied 5% recently to $125, with $14B market cap, 3% YTD gain, and 225% one-year surge despite monthly dips. Record Q4 revenue of $440M (up 14% YoY) fueled full-year growth to $1.57B, bolstered by silicon photonics partnerships with Lightwave Logic, Salience Labs, and Nvidia for AI optical modules; OFC 2026 participation underscores telecom/AI focus. Trading at 64x P/E with beta 0.94, sentiment benefits from capacity expansions and Barclays' $142 target, tempered by institutional selling and geopolitical risks in Israel.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions—like AI/semiconductor volatility—earn a spot among the 25 featured out of 351 total bots. Top agents show annualized returns from 17% to over 200%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors up to 25x, such as a semiconductor-focused bot at +103% annualized with 71% wins or multi-sector plays exceeding 130%. These virtual and brokerage agents employ technical analysis, pattern recognition, and real-time signals for stocks/ETFs. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your style and copy top performers in dynamic markets.
ARM, MTSI, and TSEM share semiconductor exposure to AI/data centers but diverge in models: ARM's asset-light IP licensing yields high margins/scalability (26x P/S), contrasting MTSI and TSEM's fab-intensive analog/photonics focus (16x and 8.6x P/S). Growth drivers include ARM's royalties, MTSI's optical connectivity, and TSEM's foundry partnerships. Recent momentum favors MTSI (27% YTD) over TSEM (3%) and ARM (4%), with risks like ARM's 4.13 beta/volatility, TSEM's geopolitics (0.94 beta), and sector-wide capex sensitivity. Valuations reflect trade-offs: ARM at premium multiples signals caution, while others offer relative value amid sentiment shifts on AI catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MTSI based on consistent trend strength, superior YTD momentum, earnings beats, and AI optical catalysts positioning it ahead in data center growth. TSEM follows closely with photonics upside and stability (low beta), while ARM trails on valuation stretch despite royalty durability. Probabilistic edge favors MTSI for near-term relative outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TSEM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTSI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSEM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARM (@Semiconductors) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while MTSI (@Semiconductors) price change was +3.95% , and TSEM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +3.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
ARM is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
MTSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
TSEM is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| ARM | MTSI | TSEM | |
| Capitalization | 159B | 18.6B | 23B |
| EBITDA | 1.11B | 259M | 507M |
| Gain YTD | 37.037 | 44.623 | 73.582 |
| P/E Ratio | 199.73 | 112.09 | 105.06 |
| Revenue | 4.67B | 1.02B | 1.51B |
| Total Cash | 3.54B | 768M | 1.22B |
| Total Debt | 461M | 531M | 164M |
MTSI | TSEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTSI's Valuation (82) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSEM (88). This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to TSEM’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MTSI (12). This means that TSEM’s stock grew similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
MTSI's SMR Rating (58) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSEM (78). This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to TSEM’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MTSI (36). This means that TSEM’s stock grew similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (53). This means that TSEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
| ARM | MTSI | TSEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OASC | 31.41 | 0.16 | +0.52% |
| OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | |||
| CPSU | 27.40 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June | |||
| BTAL | 13.52 | -0.03 | -0.22% |
| AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta | |||
| REMX | 93.20 | -0.40 | -0.43% |
| VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF | |||
| HERO | 25.89 | -0.28 | -1.06% |
| Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARM | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| LRCX - ARM | 74% Closely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| KLAC - ARM | 74% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| AMAT - ARM | 73% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| FORM - ARM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| TSM - ARM | 66% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with SITM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then SITM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSI | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| SITM - MTSI | 71% Closely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| KLAC - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| LRCX - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| VECO - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| AMKR - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +5.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSEM has been loosely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSEM jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSEM | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| MTSI - TSEM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AMKR - TSEM | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| SMTC - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| AMBA - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| KLIC - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
More | ||||