ARM
Price
$149.79
Change
+$0.88 (+0.59%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
159.08B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$421.51
Change
+$14.78 (+3.63%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
475.35B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSM
Price
$365.49
Change
-$0.41 (-0.11%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.59T
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARM or MU or TSM

Header iconARM vs MU vs TSM Comparison
Open Charts ARM vs MU vs TSMBanner chart's image
ARM vs MU vs TSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Arm Holdings (ARM) vs. Micron Technology (MU) vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ARM surged over 20% in recent market activity amid announcements of its first in-house chip and analyst upgrades, though it pulled back amid broader semiconductor sector pressures.
  • MU experienced sharp declines of nearly 10% in a single session following post-earnings selling, erasing prior gains despite strong AI-driven memory demand.
  • TSM showed relative stability with modest pullbacks, supported by its dominant position in advanced node manufacturing for AI applications.
  • All three stocks faced heightened volatility from geopolitical tensions and sector-wide concerns, with year-to-date gains led by MU at around 10-25% across the group.
  • AI catalysts remain prominent: ARM's architecture shift, MU's high-bandwidth memory (HBM) shortages, and TSM's foundry leadership.
  • Recent price action highlights TSM's lower volatility compared to peers, positioning it favorably in uncertain markets.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines ARM, MU, and TSM, three key players in the semiconductor sector powering artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing. These companies represent diverse business models—IP licensing, memory production, and contract manufacturing—amid surging demand for advanced chips. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term AI exposure will find value in analyzing their recent performance, growth drivers, and relative positioning in a volatile market environment marked by geopolitical risks and supply constraints.

ARM Overview and Recent Performance

Arm Holdings plc (ARM) designs energy-efficient processor architectures licensed to chipmakers worldwide, powering over 99% of smartphones and expanding into data centers and AI. Its royalty-based model (licensing fees plus per-chip royalties) delivers high margins with low capital intensity. In recent weeks, ARM stock surged more than 20% following the announcement of its first in-house chip, the AGI CPU, with partners like Meta and OpenAI, marking a shift from pure IP licensing. Analyst upgrades, including HSBC's double-upgrade to Buy with a $205 target, fueled optimism. However, broader sector pressures led to a pullback, with shares closing around $137 after hitting intraday highs near $167. Sentiment reflects AI enthusiasm tempered by elevated valuations.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) manufactures dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), NAND flash, and high-bandwidth memory essential for AI data centers, PCs, and mobiles. Its integrated model spans design, fabrication, and sales across cloud, consumer, and automotive segments. Recent market activity saw MU hit 52-week highs above $470 before plunging nearly 10% in one session to around $322, extending a 30% post-earnings slide despite blowout results and inability to meet AI chip demand. Year-to-date gains hover near 10-13%, but high volume selling amid memory cycle concerns and competition (e.g., Google's AI algorithms) pressured sentiment. AI-driven HBM shortages provide a buffer, though cyclical risks persist.

TSM Overview and Recent Performance

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM), the world's largest dedicated contract chipmaker (foundry), produces advanced nodes (3nm and below) for fabless firms like Nvidia and Apple. Its pure-play model focuses on manufacturing without designing chips, achieving scale through massive fabs. In recent weeks, TSM exhibited resilience, dipping about 3-5% amid sector selloffs to around $316, outperforming peers in volatility. Strong Q4 results with 35% profit growth from AI demand sustained positive momentum, with shares up nearly 90-100% over the past year. Geopolitical risks (Taiwan exposure) weigh, but capacity expansions in Arizona and Japan bolster confidence.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that analyze thousands of tickers across various assets. Only bots demonstrating strong suitability to current market conditions—factoring in volatility, trends, and sector dynamics like semiconductors—earn a spot in this trending section, with around 25 highlighted from 351 total agents. These include signal agents for short-term trades, virtual agents for pattern recognition, and brokerage agents for automated execution, spanning strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and AI-optimized portfolios with win rates often exceeding 60%, average returns of 20-50% annually, and trade frequencies from daily to weekly. Diverse timeframes and risk profiles cater to swing traders and long-term investors alike. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with stocks like ARM, MU, and TSM in today's AI-fueled markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ARM’s asset-light IP model contrasts MU’s capital-heavy memory fabrication and TSM’s foundry scale, with ARM offering highest margins (near 97%) but royalty cyclicality. Growth drivers center on AI: ARM via architectures and new chips, MU on HBM/data center demand, TSM on advanced nodes (60% market share). Recent momentum favored ARM’s surge then reversal, MU’s post-earnings crater (down 20% weekly), versus TSM’s steadier path. Risks include ARM’s premium valuation, MU’s memory cycles and competition, TSM’s geopolitics (Taiwan tensions). All share semiconductor/AI exposure, but TSM’s diversification across clients reduces single-product risk. Valuation sensitivity is highest for ARM (elevated P/E), while MU appears cheaper cyclically; market sentiment tilts toward TSM’s stability amid trade-offs in growth versus resilience.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSM due to its trend consistency, lower volatility, and strong positioning as the foundry backbone for AI chips from multiple leaders. Observable catalysts like capacity expansions and record profits, alongside relative stability versus peers’ sharper swings, suggest a probabilistic edge in the near term, though all three benefit from sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ARM: $149.79MU: $421.51TSM: $365.49)
Brand notoriety: MU and TSM are notable and ARM is not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARM: 88%, MU: 102%, TSM: 69%
Market capitalization -- ARM: $159.08B, MU: $475.35B, TSM: $1.59T
$ARM is valued at $159.08B, while MU has a market capitalization of $475.35B, and TSM's market capitalization is $1.59T. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $110.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and TSM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ARM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSM is a better buy in the long-term than MU, which in turn is a better option than ARM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the short-term than TSM, which in turn is a better option than ARM.

Price Growth

ARM (@Semiconductors) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +15.09% , and TSM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARM is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

TSM is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSM($1.59T) has a higher market cap than MU($475B) and ARM($159B). ARM has higher P/E ratio than TSM and MU: ARM (199.73) vs TSM (35.22) and MU (19.89). MU YTD gains are higher at: 47.748 vs. ARM (37.037) and TSM (20.944). TSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.74T vs. MU (37.1B) and ARM (1.11B). MU has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. ARM (3.54B) and TSM (). ARM has less debt than MU and TSM: ARM (461M) vs MU (12.4B) and TSM (). TSM has higher revenues than MU and ARM: TSM (3.81T) vs MU (58.1B) and ARM (4.67B).
ARMMUTSM
Capitalization159B475B1.59T
EBITDA1.11B37.1B2.74T
Gain YTD37.03747.74820.944
P/E Ratio199.7319.8935.22
Revenue4.67B58.1B3.81T
Total Cash3.54B8.44BN/A
Total Debt461M12.4BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs TSM: Fundamental Ratings
MU
TSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6923
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
189
SMR RATING
1..100
1726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5220
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSM's Valuation (49) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (52). This means that TSM’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (18). This means that TSM’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSM (26). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to TSM’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSM (38). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSM’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (52). This means that TSM’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARMMUTSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOOP37.410.17
+0.46%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Google ETF
ETH21.040.08
+0.38%
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Staking ETF
UAUG40.320.13
+0.32%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BufferETFAug
KORP46.850.04
+0.09%
American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF
XLV149.33-0.34
-0.23%
State Street®HlthCrSelSectSPDR®ETF

ARM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARM
1D Price
Change %
ARM100%
+0.59%
LRCX - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
KLAC - ARM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AMAT - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
FORM - ARM
73%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
TSM - ARM
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+3.63%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+6.14%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
More

TSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSM has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSM jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSM
1D Price
Change %
TSM100%
-0.11%
ASML - TSM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
ASX - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
LRCX - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
NVDA - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
MPWR - TSM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More