ASML
Price
$1459.80
Change
+$48.97 (+3.47%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
564.8B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$689.89
Change
+$17.25 (+2.56%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.72B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ON
Price
$83.01
Change
+$3.08 (+3.85%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
32.65B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASML or FN or ON

Header iconASML vs FN vs ON Comparison
Open Charts ASML vs FN vs ONBanner chart's image
ASML vs FN vs ON Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding (ASML) vs. Fabrinet (FN) vs. ON Semiconductor (ON) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ASML leads with strong YTD gains of over 20%, driven by AI chip advancements and EUV expansions, though recent volatility reflects high valuations at ~45x trailing P/E.
  • FN shows robust momentum from optical communications growth, with recent quarterly revenue up 36% YoY and shares up significantly over the past year, trading at elevated multiples amid AI datacenter demand.
  • ON offers relative stability in power semiconductors, with YTD returns around 5% and focus on automotive/industrial recovery, but faces softer revenue trends at ~P/E 20-25x.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor tailwinds, but FN exhibits the strongest recent earnings beats and guidance, positioning it favorably in high-growth optics.
  • Market caps vary widely: ASML ~$510B, FN ~$18B, ON ~$24B, highlighting scale differences in relative performance.
  • Recent weeks show pullbacks across the board amid sector rotation, yet AI-related catalysts sustain positive sentiment shifts.

Introduction

This comparison examines ASML, FN, and ON, key players in the semiconductor ecosystem spanning lithography equipment, precision optical manufacturing, and power solutions. These stocks appeal to traders eyeing AI-driven demand in chip production and datacenters, as well as investors tracking sector recovery in automotive and industrial applications. With recent market activity highlighting volatility amid broader tech rotations, understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and positioning offers insights for portfolio allocation in a dynamic environment.

ASML Overview and Recent Performance

ASML Holding N.V. is the global leader in photolithography systems, particularly extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines essential for advanced chip manufacturing by firms like TSMC. Its business model centers on designing, producing, and servicing these high-precision tools, generating recurring revenue from upgrades and maintenance. In recent market activity, ASML shares have delivered strong YTD returns exceeding 20%, with 52-week gains near 90%, fueled by AI chip demand and expansions into advanced packaging. Revenue grew 31% in FY2025 to €32.7B, with gross margins at 52.8%. Sentiment has been influenced by high valuations (~45x trailing P/E) and geopolitical scrutiny, leading to short-term pullbacks, yet EUV dominance sustains long-term optimism.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) provides advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services for OEMs in optical communications, high-performance computing, and sensors. Its model emphasizes high-mix, low-volume production with vertical integration in optics, serving datacenter and telecom needs. Recent weeks have seen FN shares rally post-earnings, with Q2 FY2026 revenue hitting $1.13B (up 36% YoY) and EPS of $3.36 beating estimates. YTD gains surpass 25% in some measures, driven by datacom acceleration and HPC scaling to over $150M quarterly. Easing supply constraints and AI optics demand have boosted sentiment, though rapid 185% one-year returns prompt valuation scrutiny at premium multiples.

ON Overview and Recent Performance

ON Semiconductor (ON), or onsemi, designs and supplies power management, sensing, and analog solutions focused on automotive, industrial, and cloud power applications. Its hybrid fab-lite model balances in-house production with outsourcing for flexibility. In recent market activity, ON shares have posted modest YTD gains around 5%, with Q4 revenue at $1.53B amid cyclical pressures but EPS beating at $0.64. Performance reflects recovery in EV and industrial segments, with price targets raised to $75 by analysts. Sentiment benefits from silicon carbide momentum, though softer overall growth tempers enthusiasm compared to peers, with shares trading at more reasonable valuations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI/ML for real-time signals on stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with featured performers showing annualized returns up to +218% (e.g., USAR, SMR, CIFR), win rates exceeding 90% (e.g., BIB at 94.92%), and others over 80% like SCHA (91.11%) and RPG (82.48%). Timeframes range from 5min to 60min, with average holds from 1D to 62D, covering styles like trend following, hedging, and volatility plays on 1-25 tickers per bot. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot, offering paper trading and brokerage integration. Explore these for data-driven insights into market opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ASML dominates in business scale as the EUV monopoly, contrasting FN's contract manufacturing agility and ON's fab-lite power focus. Growth drivers differ: ASML leverages AI logic chips, FN datacom/HPC optics (76% revenue), and ON EV/industrial sensing. Recent momentum favors FN with 25% monthly jumps post-earnings, over ASML's volatility and ON's steadier path. Risks include ASML's geopolitics/valuation (~45x P/E, $510B cap), FN's customer concentration, and ON's cyclicality. Sector exposure tilts ASML/FN toward AI semis vs. ON's diversified end-markets. Valuation sensitivity is highest for ASML, with sentiment strongest around FN's optics surge.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FN due to consistent trend strength in recent quarters, blowout earnings with upbeat AI optics guidance, and superior relative momentum amid datacenter expansion. While ASML offers unmatched stability via EUV leadership and ON provides lower-risk positioning, FN's catalysts in high-growth HPC/telecom suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, balanced against volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2026
Stock price -- (ASML: $1459.80FN: $689.89ON: $83.01)
Brand notoriety: ASML and FN are not notable and ON is notable
ASML represents the Electronic Production Equipment industry, FN is part of the Electronic Components industry, and ON is in the Semiconductors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASML: 148%, FN: 95%, ON: 263%
Market capitalization -- ASML: $564.8B, FN: $24.72B, ON: $32.65B
ASML [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $564.8B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $24.72B. ON [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $32.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $564.8B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $185.72B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $48.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $11.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $122.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and ON’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASML and FN are a better buy in the long-term than ON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ON’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the short-term than FN and ON.

Price Growth

ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +4.19% , and ON (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +20.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

ON is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.31% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Electronic Components (+4.81% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASML($565B) has a higher market cap than ON($32.7B) and FN($24.7B). ON has higher P/E ratio than FN and ASML: ON (286.24) vs FN (66.14) and ASML (47.81). ON and FN YTD gains are higher at: 53.296 and 51.531 vs. ASML (36.810). ASML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. ON (888M) and FN (466M). ASML has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. ON (2.55B) and FN (961M). FN has less debt than ON and ASML: FN (4.89M) vs ON (3.01B) and ASML (4.39B). ASML has higher revenues than ON and FN: ASML (32.7B) vs ON (6B) and FN (3.89B).
ASMLFNON
Capitalization565B24.7B32.7B
EBITDA12.6B466M888M
Gain YTD36.81051.53153.296
P/E Ratio47.8166.14286.24
Revenue32.7B3.89B6B
Total Cash13.3B961M2.55B
Total Debt4.39B4.89M3.01B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASML vs FN vs ON: Fundamental Ratings
ASML
FN
ON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
214642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27467
SMR RATING
1..100
194688
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (73) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASML (75) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as ON (89) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ASML (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ON (67) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and somewhat faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ON (88) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML's stock grew similarly to FN’s and significantly faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.

ON's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (35) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ASML (39) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ON's stock grew similarly to FN’s and somewhat faster than ASML’s over the last 12 months.

ON's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (6) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as ASML (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that ON's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMLFNON
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLD445.935.85
+1.33%
SPDR® Gold Shares
AGGY44.000.19
+0.43%
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced US Aggt Bd ETF
NYM25.110.08
+0.32%
AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF
BSMV21.100.06
+0.28%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF
PSCD107.78N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF