Advertisement
ASML or MPWR or NVTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) vs. Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ASML dominates with a $517B market cap and 23% YTD gains, but recent weeks saw a pullback amid mixed valuation views in semiconductor equipment.
- MPWR delivered robust 82% one-year returns driven by AI power demand, with $52.5B market cap, though analysts flag potential overvaluation.
- NVTS, a smaller $2B cap player in GaN tech, posted 23% YTD and explosive 276% annual gains, fueled by AI data center innovations despite ongoing losses.
- All three benefit from semiconductor and AI tailwinds, but ASML offers stability, MPWR growth momentum, and NVTS high-risk/high-reward potential.
- Recent market activity highlights valuation sensitivity across the sector, with pullbacks testing sentiment amid broader chip demand.
Introduction
This comparison examines ASML, MPWR, and NVTS, three semiconductor firms pivotal to AI and advanced computing supply chains. ASML leads in lithography equipment, MPWR excels in power management solutions, and NVTS pioneers gallium nitride (GaN) power semiconductors. Traders seeking exposure to chip manufacturing growth and investors eyeing relative performance in volatile markets will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and sector positioning. This stock comparison highlights contrasts in scale, growth drivers, and risk profiles amid ongoing AI-driven demand.
ASML Overview and Recent Performance
ASML Holding N.V., headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, is the global leader in photolithography systems essential for advanced semiconductor production, particularly extreme ultraviolet (EUV) tools used by major chipmakers. In recent market activity, ASML shares experienced a pullback of around 10% over the past month, trading near $1,317 with a $517B market cap, despite strong YTD gains of 23% and 81% over the past year. Sentiment has been influenced by mixed analyst views on valuation—some deem it elevated relative to growth outlook—amid robust long-term demand for AI chips. Key factors include solid revenue growth and a forward P/E of about 39, underscoring its monopoly-like position in high-end equipment, though cyclical export restrictions and sector volatility weigh on near-term performance.
MPWR Overview and Recent Performance
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR), based in West Palm Beach, Florida, designs high-performance power management semiconductors for AI servers, automotive, and consumer applications. Recent weeks showed resilience with shares around $1,069 and a $52.5B market cap, reflecting 18% YTD and 82% one-year returns, though subject to sector sell-offs. Performance has been buoyed by enterprise data center demand and recent quarterly revenue beats, with full-year 2025 sales up 26% to $2.79B. Analysts note potential overvaluation at a trailing P/E near 83, yet maintain buy ratings citing AI catalysts. Sentiment shifts stem from strong earnings momentum balanced against premium pricing in a competitive power chip landscape.
NVTS Overview and Recent Performance
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS), from Torrance, California, specializes in efficient GaN and silicon carbide power semiconductors for fast charging, EVs, and AI data centers. Shares trade near $8.75 with a $2B market cap, up 23% YTD and 276% over the past year, with recent surges tied to new SiC chip launches and AI-focused products showcased at events like NVIDIA GTC. Despite losses (negative EPS), momentum reflects growth in high-voltage applications, though high volatility persists with a 52-week range of $1.52–$17.79. Investor sentiment benefits from AI power efficiency tailwinds, tempered by profitability challenges and neutral analyst holds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a total of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML pattern recognition, technical and fundamental analysis, across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, targeting sets of 1 to 25 tickers in sectors including semiconductors, energy, and aerospace. Performance stats highlight annualized returns ranging from 16% to 188%, win rates of 56%–89%, and profit factors up to 12, with low drawdowns demonstrating risk management. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot in this dynamic section, adapting to market shifts. Explore Trending AI Robots to see real-time leaders like those targeting MPWR with 83% annualized returns.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ASML, MPWR, and NVTS operate in the semiconductor ecosystem but diverge in business models: ASML's capital-intensive equipment sales contrast MPWR's fabless power ICs and NVTS's emerging GaN/SiC focus. Growth drivers include AI chip production for ASML, data center power for MPWR, and efficient AI infrastructure for NVTS. Recent momentum favors NVTS's volatility-driven gains over ASML's stability and MPWR's steady climb. Risk factors: ASML faces geopolitical export curbs, MPWR competition, and NVTS path to profitability. Valuation sensitivity is highest for MPWR (P/E 83) and loss-making NVTS, versus ASML's 46. Market sentiment tilts toward AI exposure, with trade-offs in scale versus agility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MPWR for its consistent trend strength in AI power demand, balanced growth, and positive catalysts like recent earnings beats, positioning it ahead in relative momentum over ASML's scale and NVTS's volatility. Observable factors such as 82% annual returns and sector tailwinds suggest higher probability of outperformance, though all carry semiconductor cyclical risks.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMPWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MPWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPWR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MPWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NVTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while MPWR (@Semiconductors) price change was +8.46% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +29.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +9.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.55%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
MPWR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+9.07% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+10.10% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| ASML | MPWR | NVTS | |
| Capitalization | 564B | 73.2B | 3.05B |
| EBITDA | 12.6B | 781M | -67.33M |
| Gain YTD | 38.376 | 64.818 | 84.874 |
| P/E Ratio | 48.51 | 115.93 | N/A |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 2.79B | 45.9M |
| Total Cash | 13.3B | 581M | 237M |
| Total Debt | 4.39B | 15.1M | 6.47M |
ASML | MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASML's Valuation (75) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (84) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
MPWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MPWR (46) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to MPWR’s over the last 12 months.
MPWR's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASML (39) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASML’s over the last 12 months.
MPWR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MPWR’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
| ASML | MPWR | NVTS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 66% | 22 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JIRE | 81.40 | 1.20 | +1.50% |
| JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF | |||
| QB | 43.44 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF | |||
| SEIQ | 38.64 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Qual Fac ETF | |||
| IHD | 7.23 | -0.01 | -0.14% |
| VOYA EMERGING MARKETS HIGH Income DIVIDEND EQUITY FUND | |||
| ARKD | 20.22 | -0.05 | -0.22% |
| ARK DIET Q1 Buffer ETF | |||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| NXPI - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| AMAT - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| KLIC - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
NVTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVTS | 100% | +7.14% | ||
| IFNNY - NVTS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| TOELY - NVTS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| PENG - NVTS | 43% Loosely correlated | +5.09% | ||
| AAOI - NVTS | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| COHU - NVTS | 41% Loosely correlated | +7.30% | ||
More | ||||