Advertisement
ASML or MRVL or TSEM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs. Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) vs. Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ASML leads in market dominance with a $492 billion market cap but has faced recent pullbacks amid sector selloffs, down around 8% over the past month despite strong YTD gains of over 17%.
- MRVL benefits from AI data center demand, posting robust quarterly revenue growth of 22% year-over-year, though shares have shown volatility with recent dips.
- TSEM exhibits explosive momentum, up over 40% YTD and nearly 370% over the past year, driven by silicon photonics and analog chip demand, positioning it as a high-growth foundry.
- All three stocks operate in the semiconductor space, with ASML focused on lithography equipment, MRVL on data infrastructure chips, and TSEM on specialty analog manufacturing.
- Recent market activity highlights trade-offs: ASML's stability versus TSEM's outperformance and MRVL's AI catalysts.
- Valuations reflect growth prospects, with ASML at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) around 44x, MRVL at 29x, and TSEM higher due to rapid expansion.
Introduction
This comparison examines ASML, MRVL, and TSEM, three key players in the semiconductor ecosystem fueled by AI and data center expansion. ASML supplies critical lithography equipment, MRVL designs data infrastructure semiconductors, and TSEM provides specialty foundry services for analog chips. Traders seeking exposure to chip manufacturing trends and investors tracking relative performance in recent market activity will find value in analyzing their business models, momentum, and sector positioning. This stock comparison highlights contrasts in growth drivers and risks amid ongoing AI infrastructure buildout.
ASML Overview and Recent Performance
ASML Holding N.V., based in the Netherlands, dominates the lithography equipment market, producing extreme ultraviolet (EUV) systems essential for advanced chip fabrication by foundries like TSMC. Its near-monopoly in EUV technology supports the production of smaller, more efficient semiconductors driving AI applications. In recent market activity, ASML shares have experienced pullbacks, declining about 8% over the past month and over 10% in the last five days amid broader chip sector selloffs. Year-to-date gains stand at around 17-20%, reflecting robust long-term demand with a $38.8 billion order backlog and major deals like SK Hynix's $8 billion EUV purchase. Sentiment has been influenced by geopolitical export restrictions and workforce protests over restructuring, yet analysts maintain bullish targets amid expected revenue growth of 31% and strong EUV shipment forecasts.
MRVL Overview and Recent Performance
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL), a fabless semiconductor designer headquartered in California, specializes in data infrastructure solutions including custom AI chips, networking, and storage processors for cloud data centers, 5G, and automotive uses. Recent quarters show strong momentum, with fiscal Q4 revenue up 22% year-over-year to $2.22 billion, driven by AI demand, and guidance for multi-year growth sending shares surging post-earnings. In recent weeks, MRVL has displayed volatility, down 7% in a single session but up nearly 10% monthly and 12% YTD, outperforming in data center segments amid optimistic fiscal 2028 forecasts. Performance reflects robust custom chip orders from hyperscalers, though broader sector pressures and supply chain issues have tempered gains, with trailing P/E around 29x signaling growth expectations.
TSEM Overview and Recent Performance
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM), an Israeli pure-play foundry, manufactures customized analog and mixed-signal semiconductors, including RF, power management, CMOS image sensors, and silicon photonics for automotive, industrial, and AI infrastructure. Recent performance has been stellar, with shares up over 40% YTD and 370% annually, fueled by silicon photonics demand where over 70% of capacity is pre-booked through 2028 via customer prepayments. In recent market activity, TSEM beat Q4 profit estimates on AI chip strength, prompting capex acceleration and upward revenue revisions targeting $2.84 billion by 2028 with 39% gross margins. Sentiment is buoyed by partnerships and analyst upgrades to $230 targets, though patent suits from GlobalFoundries introduce minor risks; its $18 billion market cap underscores rapid re-rating.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a library of 351, designed for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto in high-growth sectors like AI and semiconductors. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from price action analysis and swing trading to fundamental scans—across timeframes like 5-minute expert, 15-minute intermediate, and 60-minute setups, with risk levels from low to high volatility. Standouts have delivered annualized returns up to 171% over 30 days, with win rates reaching 100% in select patterns and 90% on leveraged ETFs, adapting dynamically to market conditions via advanced financial learning models. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI bots trading thousands of tickers, this section highlights the most suitable for prevailing trends. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ASML, MRVL, and TSEM share semiconductor exposure but diverge in models: ASML's equipment monopoly contrasts MRVL's fabless chip design and TSEM's contract manufacturing focus on analog specialties. Growth drivers include AI lithography for ASML, custom data center ASICs for MRVL, and photonics capacity for TSEM. Recent momentum favors TSEM (40%+ YTD) over ASML (17%) and MRVL (12%), but with higher volatility. Risks encompass ASML's export curbs, MRVL's competition from Broadcom, and TSEM's regional geopolitics. Valuation sensitivity shows ASML at 44x P/E premium for scale, MRVL at 29x on revenue acceleration, and TSEM elevated amid expansion. Market sentiment tilts bullish on AI tailwinds, balancing ASML's stability against peers' upside potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSEM due to its superior trend consistency, with over 40% YTD gains and secured photonics capacity signaling sustained catalysts amid AI optical demand. Relative to ASML's recent dips and MRVL's volatility, TSEM shows stronger short-term positioning, though all benefit from sector tailwinds—probabilistic edge leans toward its momentum and backlog visibility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TSEM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MRVL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TSEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSEM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MRVL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TSEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while MRVL (@Semiconductors) price change was +8.72% , and TSEM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +11.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
MRVL is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.
TSEM is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.31% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| ASML | MRVL | TSEM | |
| Capitalization | 565B | 122B | 24.6B |
| EBITDA | 12.6B | 4.54B | 507M |
| Gain YTD | 36.810 | 64.580 | 92.855 |
| P/E Ratio | 47.81 | 45.50 | 116.72 |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 8.2B | 1.51B |
| Total Cash | 13.3B | 2.64B | 1.22B |
| Total Debt | 4.39B | 4.79B | 164M |
ASML | MRVL | TSEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 47 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 42 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 45 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 35 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 29 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRVL's Valuation (71) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (75) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as TSEM (88) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and similarly to TSEM’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (27) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVL (42) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TSEM's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and somewhat faster than MRVL’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MRVL (45) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TSEM (79) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ASML's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and somewhat faster than TSEM’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MRVL (35) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as ASML (39) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TSEM's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
TSEM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ASML (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as MRVL (29) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TSEM's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and similarly to MRVL’s over the last 12 months.
| ASML | MRVL | TSEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 21 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QABA | 62.62 | 1.49 | +2.43% |
| First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF | |||
| IFLO | 33.04 | 0.35 | +1.09% |
| VictoryShares Intl Free Csh Flow ETF | |||
| IBHI | 23.54 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
| iShares iBonds 2029 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| MUNI | 52.56 | 0.12 | +0.23% |
| PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF | |||
| MULL | 186.85 | -1.78 | -0.94% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | |||
ASML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASML has been closely correlated with ASMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASML jumps, then ASMLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASML | 100% | +3.47% | ||
| ASMLF - ASML | 85% Closely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| ASMIY - ASML | 80% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| LRCX - ASML | 80% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| KLAC - ASML | 79% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| AMAT - ASML | 77% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||
TSEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSEM has been loosely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSEM jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSEM | 100% | +5.45% | ||
| MTSI - TSEM | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.95% | ||
| AMKR - TSEM | 61% Loosely correlated | +7.11% | ||
| AMBA - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| KLIC - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| KLAC - TSEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.26% | ||
More | ||||