Advertisement
AVAV or KTOS or PL
AeroVironment (AVAV) vs Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) vs Planet Labs PBC (PL) Earnings Recap: Recent Results Highlight Defense Tech Momentum
Key Takeaways
- AVAV reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $408 million on March 10, 2026, up 143% YoY, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.64; updated FY2026 revenue guidance to $1.85-1.95 billion.
- KTOS posted Q4 FY2025 revenue of $345.1 million on February 23, 2026, up 21.9% YoY, with adjusted EPS of $0.18; FY2025 revenue reached $1.347 billion.
- PL delivered Q4 FY2026 revenue of $86.8 million on March 19, 2026, up 41% YoY, achieving break-even non-GAAP EPS; full-year revenue hit $307.7 million, up 26%.
- All three showed robust revenue growth amid defense and space demand, though AVAV faced GAAP losses from impairments.
Earnings Context and Competitive Landscape
In the defense technology sector, earnings reports from AVAV, KTOS, and PL underscore rising demand for unmanned systems, drones, and Earth observation data. AVAV and KTOS overlap in autonomous aerial and hypersonic technologies for military applications, while PL provides satellite imagery complementing their ISR capabilities. Recent results reflect contract wins and backlog growth, positioning them in a competitive landscape driven by geopolitical tensions and space investments.
Planet Labs PBC Focus
Planet Labs PBC (PL) released fiscal Q4 and full-year 2026 results on March 19, 2026, for the quarter ended January 31, 2026. Revenue reached a record $86.8 million, surpassing expectations and growing 41% YoY, fueled by defense/intelligence and government usage. Full-year revenue was $307.7 million, up 26% YoY, with 98% recurring ACV. The company achieved break-even non-GAAP EPS, its first full year of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow profitability. Backlog surged 79% to $900 million, with RPOs up 106% to $852 million. Q1 FY2027 revenue guidance is $87-91 million, and FY2027 revenue is projected at $415-440 million.
AeroVironment Context
AeroVironment (AVAV), fiscal year ending April 30, reported Q3 FY2026 results on March 10, 2026, for the quarter ended January 31, 2026. Revenue hit $408 million, up 143% YoY, driven by product and service growth post-BlueHalo acquisition. Non-GAAP EPS was $0.64, up from $0.30 YoY, with adjusted EBITDA at $44.5 million. GAAP net loss was $156.6 million due to $151.3 million goodwill impairment. Funded backlog reached $1.1 billion, with nine-month bookings at $2.1 billion. FY2026 guidance updated to revenue $1.85-1.95 billion, non-GAAP EPS $2.75-3.10.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Context
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS), calendar year-end, announced Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 23, 2026, for the quarter ended December 28, 2025. Q4 revenue was $345.1 million, up 21.9% YoY (20% organic), with adjusted EPS $0.18. Full-year revenue totaled $1.347 billion, up 16.6% organically. Adjusted EBITDA was $34.1 million in Q4, $119.9 million annually. Book-to-bill was 1.3x in Q4, with record backlog. Q1 2026 revenue guidance $335-345 million; FY2026 $1.60-1.68 billion.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
Across earnings quality, PL impressed with profitability inflection and 41% Q4 growth, signaling scaling in satellite data. AVAV led revenue surge at 143% but showed impairment risks, with strong backlog mitigating concerns. KTOS delivered consistent beats and organic growth. Growth signals favor all amid defense spending; PL and AVAV exhibit higher volatility due to tech exposure, while KTOS offers stability. Investor sentiment leans positive on backlogs, with PL's profitability boosting appeal.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the strongest AI bots from a larger pool of hundreds of bots trading thousands of tickers. It highlights top performers based on recent profitability, win rates, and risk-adjusted returns across various timeframes like daily, weekly, or monthly. Bots vary by style—scalping, swing trading, trend-following—and performance metrics such as Sharpe ratio, max drawdown, and total return. Users can explore, backtest, and deploy these AI-driven strategies for stocks including AVAV, KTOS, and PL, aiding data-driven decisions in volatile defense tech markets.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI currently favors PL with 65% probability due to its recent profitability milestone, explosive backlog growth, and defense sector tailwinds, positioning it for superior risk-adjusted returns over the next quarter compared to AVAV's impairments and KTOS's steadier but slower expansion.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVAV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTOS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- AVAV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KTOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVAV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTOS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AVAV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KTOS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AVAV (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +6.51% price change this week, while KTOS (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.92% , and PL (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +10.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
AVAV is expected to report earnings on Jun 30, 2026.
KTOS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
PL is expected to report earnings on Jun 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+2.22% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| AVAV | KTOS | PL | |
| Capitalization | 9.98B | 13.1B | 13B |
| EBITDA | 104M | 103M | -196.94M |
| Gain YTD | -20.865 | -6.481 | 90.162 |
| P/E Ratio | 149.03 | 537.15 | N/A |
| Revenue | 1.61B | 1.35B | 308M |
| Total Cash | 587M | 561M | 640M |
| Total Debt | 826M | 146M | 462M |
AVAV | KTOS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AVAV's Valuation (83) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as KTOS (94). This means that AVAV’s stock grew similarly to KTOS’s over the last 12 months.
KTOS's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as AVAV (79). This means that KTOS’s stock grew similarly to AVAV’s over the last 12 months.
KTOS's SMR Rating (89) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as AVAV (92). This means that KTOS’s stock grew similarly to AVAV’s over the last 12 months.
KTOS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as AVAV (65). This means that KTOS’s stock grew similarly to AVAV’s over the last 12 months.
KTOS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as AVAV (16). This means that KTOS’s stock grew similarly to AVAV’s over the last 12 months.
| AVAV | KTOS | PL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPGM | 82.55 | 1.07 | +1.31% |
| State Street® SPDR® Ptf MSCIGlbStkMktETF | |||
| APRT | 44.64 | 0.24 | +0.54% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Apr ETF | |||
| YFFI | 10.16 | 0.05 | +0.49% |
| Indexperts Yield Focused Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| LINT | 75.82 | -0.08 | -0.11% |
| Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF | |||
| TZA | 5.08 | -0.35 | -6.45% |
| Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF | |||
AVAV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAV has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAV jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVAV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVAV | 100% | -5.23% | ||
| KTOS - AVAV | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| KRMN - AVAV | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.93% | ||
| MRCY - AVAV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| DRS - AVAV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| GD - AVAV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
KTOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KTOS has been loosely correlated with KRMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KTOS jumps, then KRMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTOS | 100% | -4.60% | ||
| KRMN - KTOS | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.93% | ||
| AVAV - KTOS | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| MRCY - KTOS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| DRS - KTOS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| HII - KTOS | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
PL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PL has been loosely correlated with RKLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PL jumps, then RKLB could also see price increases.