This comparison examines BA, HWM, and TDG, key players in the aerospace and defense sector amid recovering commercial aviation and sustained military demand. Boeing focuses on full aircraft manufacturing, while Howmet Aerospace and TransDigm specialize in critical components and aftermarket parts. Investors tracking relative performance in this cyclical industry, particularly those eyeing growth from jet engine demand and defense backlogs, will benefit from analyzing their recent momentum, valuation sensitivities, and sector exposures in today's market environment.
Boeing (BA), a global leader in commercial airplanes, defense systems, and space vehicles, has faced production hurdles including 737 MAX wiring flaws potentially delaying deliveries and a NASA Starliner mishap drawing execution scrutiny. Recent market activity reflects volatility, with shares down around 3% YTD but up over 30% in the past year. Positive catalysts include a $2.34 billion U.S. Air Force contract modification and discussions to boost jetliner sales to China. Sentiment balances recovery hopes against cash flow strains and regulatory pressures, positioning BA as a high-beta play on aviation rebound and defense stability.
Howmet Aerospace (HWM), a provider of advanced engineered solutions for jet engines and aerospace structures, benefits from strong aftermarket demand. Shares have outperformed with about 16% YTD gains and 90%+ one-year returns, alongside a 748% five-year total return. Recent weeks highlight earnings momentum, with projections for 25%+ EPS growth and 15% revenue increase, fueled by commercial and defense sector tailwinds. Despite short-term dips amid market volatility, analyst optimism underscores long-term potential in high-margin engine components, driving positive relative performance.
TransDigm Group (TDG), which designs and supplies aircraft components for nearly every platform in service, reported Q1 fiscal 2026 revenue up 12% and raised full-year guidance to nearly $10 billion. Shares show mixed recent behavior, down around 6% YTD but with strong multi-year gains, reflecting aftermarket resilience despite high leverage. Key influences include robust demand for power and control systems, though profitability edges tempered by operational challenges. Market sentiment favors its acquisition-driven growth amid aerospace upcycle.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers selected from over 350 AI trading bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots, powered by AI/ML models using technical and fundamental analysis, deliver standout stats like annualized returns up to 130%, win rates over 70%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0, with average trade durations from hours to days. Examples include an "Aerospace HWM" bot with +57% return and 69% win rate on 5-minute trades, and multi-ticker aerospace strategies blending defense ETFs. Curated for current volatility, they highlight adaptive edges in sectors like aerospace. Explore Trending AI Robots to see how AI adapts to real-time conditions.
BA’s integrated manufacturing model contrasts with HWM and TDG’s focused component strategies, exposing Boeing to broader execution risks like supply chain disruptions while suppliers capture higher aftermarket margins. Growth drivers favor HWM’s engine parts amid jet orders, versus TDG’s acquisitions and BA’s defense wins. Recent momentum leads HWM, with BA volatile and TDG stable. Risks include BA’s regulatory scrutiny, TDG’s $30B+ debt (EV/EBITDA ~21x), and HWM’s Boeing dependency. Valuations show TDG at 39x P/E, HWM elevated on growth (~68x), and BA cheaper but loss-making. Sentiment tilts to suppliers’ stability over BA’s scale trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors HWM due to consistent trend strength, superior YTD momentum, and bots achieving +57% returns on its trades, alongside robust earnings projections and lower leverage versus peers. While TDG offers aftermarket stability and BA defense catalysts, HWM’s relative positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in the near-term aerospace upcycle.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and TDG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TDG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BA (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +4.52% price change this week, while HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +8.59% , and TDG (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +3.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.47%.
BA is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
HWM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
TDG is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| BA | HWM | TDG | |
| Capitalization | 171B | 101B | 68.2B |
| EBITDA | 7.36B | 2.27B | 4.63B |
| Gain YTD | 0.235 | 23.312 | -9.224 |
| P/E Ratio | 87.75 | 68.11 | 38.84 |
| Revenue | 89.5B | 8.25B | 9.11B |
| Total Cash | 29.4B | 742M | 2.53B |
| Total Debt | 54.4B | 3.21B | 30B |
BA | HWM | TDG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 74 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 3 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 30 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 12 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 21 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 | 33 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TDG's Valuation (71) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (75) in the null industry, and is in the same range as BA (85) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that TDG's stock grew similarly to HWM’s and similarly to BA’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as TDG (28) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BA (100) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew similarly to TDG’s and significantly faster than BA’s over the last 12 months.
BA's SMR Rating (10) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDG (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as HWM (30) in the null industry. This means that BA's stock grew similarly to TDG’s and similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BA (51) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (61) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew somewhat faster than BA’s and somewhat faster than TDG’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BA (73) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (77) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew somewhat faster than BA’s and somewhat faster than TDG’s over the last 12 months.
| BA | HWM | TDG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 50% | 13 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BA has been loosely correlated with SARO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BA jumps, then SARO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDG has been loosely correlated with HEI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDG jumps, then HEI could also see price increases.