This comparison examines BA, LHX, and TDG, key players in the aerospace and defense sector. Boeing focuses on commercial and military aircraft, L3Harris on defense electronics and communications, and TransDigm on specialized aircraft components. Investors tracking aviation recovery, defense spending surges, and supply chain dynamics will find value here, as these stocks reflect broader trends in geopolitical demand and commercial travel rebound. Recent market activity underscores their relative performance amid volatility.
Boeing (BA), a leading global aerospace manufacturer, designs and produces commercial airplanes, defense systems, and space vehicles. In recent market activity, its shares have gained traction, trading around $231 with over 40% appreciation over the past year. Key influences include negotiations for a potential 500-aircraft order from China, including 737 MAX jets, signaling demand recovery. However, challenges like a terminated NASA contract and production scrutiny have tempered sentiment. Broader recovery in air travel supports backlog growth, though operational hurdles persist, contributing to volatile price behavior.
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) specializes in defense technologies, including communication systems, sensors, and mission solutions across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains. Shares have surged around 25% YTD and 75% over the past year, trading near $367. Recent strength stems from U.S. Navy contracts for precision-strike programs and leadership shifts to prepare a missile solutions spin-off. Despite some quarterly revenue pressures from government delays, record orders exceeding $27 billion and diversified exposure to rising defense budgets have bolstered positive sentiment and momentum.
TransDigm Group (TDG) designs and supplies highly engineered aircraft components for commercial and military platforms, emphasizing proprietary aftermarket parts. Trading near $1,295, shares are down about 2.6% YTD but up modestly over the past year. Recent quarters showed strong Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings beats and revenue growth over 11%, with operating margins around 47%. However, $3.16 billion in acquisitions has sparked integration concerns, leading to short-term pullbacks despite raised FY26 guidance and analyst upgrades to Buy.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only the highest-performing bots suited to prevailing market conditions—like volatility levels and sector rotations—earn a spot in this dynamic lineup, with AI continuously scanning and scoring for optimal picks. Featured bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns from +14% to over +218%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors up to 25.8. Aerospace and defense bots stand out, such as AeroDefense ITA at +32% annualized return and 80% win rate, or multi-sector agents blending aerospace with semis and oil at +135% returns. These vary from short-term signal agents to customizable virtual portfolios with risk management. Traders can explore and subscribe to replicate top performers tailored to current trends.
BA, LHX, and TDG operate in interconnected aerospace-defense ecosystems but diverge in models: Boeing's scale in full aircraft production contrasts L3Harris's electronics focus and TransDigm's niche components. Growth drivers favor defense-heavy LHX amid geopolitical tensions, while BA and TDG leverage commercial aftermarket demand. Recent momentum shines for LHX (25% YTD) over BA's rebound and TDG's flat performance. Risk factors include BA's production woes, TDG's acquisition debt, and LHX's government contract reliance. Sector exposure tilts LHX toward stable defense (60%+ U.S. DoD), versus BA/TDG's commercial sensitivity. Valuation shows TDG's superior 47% margins justifying premium P/E around 41x, LHX at 43x with steady growth, and BA's negative earnings amid recovery. Sentiment favors LHX's consistency over BA's volatility and TDG's integration trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors LHX based on trend consistency, YTD outperformance, catalyst-rich defense positioning, and relative stability versus peers. Observable factors like 75% 1-year gains, strong backlogs, and sector-aligned bot success suggest higher probability of continued momentum, though all three hold potential in rising aerospace demand.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLHX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and TDG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LHX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TDG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BA (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -0.92% , and TDG (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +4.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.52%.
BA is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
LHX is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
TDG is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| BA | LHX | TDG | |
| Capitalization | 176B | 65.4B | 71.5B |
| EBITDA | 7.36B | 3.75B | 4.63B |
| Gain YTD | 2.883 | 19.757 | -4.810 |
| P/E Ratio | 90.07 | 41.07 | 40.73 |
| Revenue | 89.5B | 21.9B | 9.11B |
| Total Cash | 29.4B | 1.07B | 2.53B |
| Total Debt | 54.4B | 11.1B | 30B |
BA | LHX | TDG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 69 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 75 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 47 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 25 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (72) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BA (84) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX's stock grew somewhat faster than TDG’s and somewhat faster than BA’s over the last 12 months.
TDG's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (28) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BA (100) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that TDG's stock grew similarly to LHX’s and significantly faster than BA’s over the last 12 months.
BA's SMR Rating (10) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TDG (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (75) in the null industry. This means that BA's stock grew similarly to TDG’s and somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BA (50) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as TDG (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX's stock grew similarly to BA’s and similarly to TDG’s over the last 12 months.
LHX's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BA (71) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (77) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX's stock grew somewhat faster than BA’s and somewhat faster than TDG’s over the last 12 months.
| BA | LHX | TDG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A | 3 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 14 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MOTO | 62.32 | 1.90 | +3.15% |
| Guinness Atkinson Smart Trans & Tch ETF | |||
| IXP | 123.92 | 0.54 | +0.44% |
| iShares Global Comm Services ETF | |||
| FNGG | 204.21 | 0.71 | +0.35% |
| Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
| IGF | 67.56 | 0.19 | +0.28% |
| iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| GJS | 23.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with GD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then GD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LHX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHX | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| GD - LHX | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| HII - LHX | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NOC - LHX | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| KTOS - LHX | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| BWXT - LHX | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDG has been loosely correlated with HEI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDG jumps, then HEI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDG | 100% | +3.07% | ||
| HEI - TDG | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| VVX - TDG | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| SAFRY - TDG | 39% Loosely correlated | +5.35% | ||
| RYCEY - TDG | 36% Loosely correlated | +5.08% | ||
| SARO - TDG | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||