BAC
Price
$52.54
Change
-$0.17 (-0.32%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
375.44B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CFG
Price
$64.17
Change
-$0.80 (-1.23%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
27.27B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$85.40
Change
-$0.62 (-0.72%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
262.6B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC or CFG or WFC

Header iconBAC vs CFG vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs CFG vs WFCBanner chart's image
BAC vs CFG vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank of America (BAC) vs. Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAC demonstrates relative resilience with a year-to-date decline of approximately 14%, outperforming WFC's steeper 20% drop amid broader sector pressures.
  • CFG has attracted analyst upgrades with price targets up to $80, signaling growth potential despite recent 18% monthly declines linked to credit concerns.
  • All three banks face headwinds from interest rate sensitivity and economic uncertainty, but BAC benefits from strong capital markets and digital growth, while WFC eyes earnings recovery.
  • Valuation metrics show comparable P/E ratios around 12-14, with dividend yields hovering at 2.4-3.3%, offering similar income appeal in a volatile market.
  • Recent market activity reflects banking sector volatility, with CFG positioned for rebound via fee income expansion and buybacks.
  • Tickeron's AI tools highlight relative momentum, favoring stability in larger players like BAC over recent weeks.

Introduction

This comparison examines BAC, CFG, and WFC, three key players in the U.S. banking sector spanning megabanks and regional lenders. Investors and traders analyzing financial stocks will find value in their shared exposure to net interest income, consumer lending, and fee-based services amid shifting interest rates and economic signals. With recent volatility driven by credit market concerns and earnings anticipation, this analysis highlights relative performance, growth drivers, and positioning to aid informed stock comparison decisions in the current environment.

BAC Overview and Recent Performance

Bank of America (BAC), a global leader with over $3 trillion in assets, operates consumer banking, global markets, and wealth management divisions. In recent market activity, shares trading around $47 have declined about 14% year-to-date from peaks near $58, reflecting broader financial sector pressures including rate sensitivity. Recent quarters showed net income of $7.6 billion and EPS of $0.98, beating estimates via net interest income growth and equities trading. Management guides 5-7% NII expansion, supported by digital tools like AI assistant Erica and cleared stress tests enabling dividend hikes. Sentiment balances growth in capital markets against legal and economic headwinds, with a market cap near $370 billion and P/E around 12.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Group (CFG), a regional bank focused on commercial and consumer lending primarily in the Northeast, manages assets exceeding $220 billion. Shares near $56 have fallen roughly 5% year-to-date and 18% over recent weeks, tied to banking volatility and credit concerns despite strong Q4 results with 32% profit growth to $528 million and EPS up 36% to $1.13. Analyst upgrades from Baird ($65 target) and Morgan Stanley ($80) underscore optimism for fee income in wealth and capital markets. NII projections of 10-12% growth and $700-850 million buybacks bolster positioning, though non-performing assets pose risks. Market cap stands at about $25 billion with P/E near 14 and dividend yield over 3%.

WFC Overview and Recent Performance

Wells Fargo (WFC), with $2 trillion in assets, emphasizes community banking, mortgages, and commercial services post-regulatory asset cap lift. Shares around $74 have dropped 20% year-to-date and 15% in recent weeks ahead of earnings, lagging peers amid credit worries despite Q4 adjusted EPS of $1.76 topping forecasts and full-year ROTCE at 15%. Analysts project 23% EPS growth, fueled by efficiency and fee gains, with restructuring aiding cost controls. Sentiment reflects resilience in stabilizing rates but caution on non-performing assets. Trading at P/E of 12 with $230 billion market cap and 2.4% yield, it positions for recovery.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These standout performers, selected by AI for current market suitability, deliver impressive stats like annualized returns up to 210% (e.g., volatility bots on USAR, SMR, CIFR), win rates reaching 95% (Biotechnology BIB), and coverage of 3-25 tickers in areas like semiconductors (SOXL at 103%), oil, and aerospace. Bots employ AI/ML on 5-60 minute intervals for trend-following, hedging, and dip-buying, often outperforming in volatility. Explore these high-potential options tailored to today’s conditions via the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAC and WFC as megabanks leverage scale for diversified revenue—BAC via global markets and digital innovation, WFC through mortgages and post-cap expansion—contrasting CFG’s regional focus on lending efficiency. Growth drivers include NII expansion (BAC 5-7%, CFG 10-12%) versus WFC’s fee recovery. Recent momentum favors BAC’s milder YTD losses over peers’ sharper drops. Risks weigh heavier on regionals like CFG from credit stress, while megabanks face regulatory scrutiny. Valuation sensitivity appears balanced at P/E 12-14, with CFG’s higher yield trading off scale. Market sentiment tilts toward BAC for stability amid sector rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BAC due to superior trend consistency, lower relative YTD drawdown, and catalysts like NII growth plus digital momentum. Its scale provides stability over CFG’s regional volatility and WFC’s earnings overhang, positioning it probabilistically stronger in stabilizing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $52.54CFG: $64.17WFC: $85.40)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are notable and CFG is not notable
BAC and WFC are part of the Major Banks industry, and CFG is in the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 63%, CFG: 86%, WFC: 62%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $375.44B, CFG: $27.27B, WFC: $262.6B
$BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $375.44B. $WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $ $262.6B. $CFG [@Regional Banks] has a market capitalization of $ $27.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $ $831.14B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $ $147.71B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $ $147.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $ $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and WFC’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG and WFC are a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WFC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the short-term than CFG and WFC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.40% price change this week, while CFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.21% , and WFC (@Major Banks) price fluctuated +5.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+4.00% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (+2.59% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($375B) has a higher market cap than WFC($263B) and CFG($27.3B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than BAC and WFC: CFG (16.62) vs BAC (13.79) and WFC (13.64). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 10.633 vs. BAC (-3.933) and WFC (-7.919). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. BAC (25.4B) and CFG (11.6B). CFG has less debt than WFC and BAC: CFG (11.3B) vs WFC (193B) and BAC (366B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC and CFG: BAC (113B) vs WFC (83.7B) and CFG (8.25B).
BACCFGWFC
Capitalization375B27.3B263B
EBITDAN/AN/AN/A
Gain YTD-3.93310.633-7.919
P/E Ratio13.7916.6213.64
Revenue113B8.25B83.7B
Total Cash25.4B11.6B34.8B
Total Debt366B11.3B193B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs CFG vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
CFG
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
281921
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
514619
SMR RATING
1..100
172
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
471348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
392544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (80) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as CFG (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (46) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as BAC (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that WFC's stock grew similarly to CFG’s and similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as CFG (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (47) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for WFC (48) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG's stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s and somewhat faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (39) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as WFC (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACCFGWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDOW31.720.55
+1.76%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
IAUG29.330.05
+0.17%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Aug
BUFZ26.84-0.02
-0.07%
FT Vest Laddered Moderate Bffr ETF
VO296.70-1.54
-0.52%
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
SNAV35.40-0.20
-0.55%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
-0.32%
WFC - BAC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
C - BAC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
JPM - BAC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
BK - BAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
-1.23%
TFC - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
KEY - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
WTFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
RF - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
ZION - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-0.72%
BAC - WFC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
C - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
JPM - WFC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
BK - WFC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More