This stock comparison examines BAC, JPM, and ZION, three key players in the U.S. banking sector spanning megabanks to regional institutions. Investors and traders analyzing relative performance, market positioning, and sector exposure will find value here, particularly amid interest rate dynamics and economic shifts. These stocks represent diverse scales: global diversification at BAC and JPM, and focused growth in Western states for ZION. Recent market activity underscores their varying responses to sentiment changes, aiding decisions on portfolio allocation in banking stocks.
Bank of America (BAC) is a leading global financial institution serving consumers, small businesses, and corporations through segments like consumer banking, global wealth management, and markets. With a market cap exceeding $370 billion, it offers extensive retail networks and digital capabilities. In recent weeks, BAC shares have traded around $47, posting YTD returns of approximately 13.5% amid stable trading volumes over 33 million shares daily. Performance reflects resilience in net interest income, though influenced by regulatory settlements and broader sector pressures on large banks. Sentiment remains steady, supported by upward earnings revisions and a PE ratio indicating value relative to peers.
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) stands as the largest U.S. bank by assets over $3.9 trillion, delivering consumer banking, investment banking, and asset management across global markets. Its fortress balance sheet and diversified revenue streams underpin leadership in payments and capital markets. Recently, JPM shares have moved near $287, with a 52-week range of $202-$337 and YTD performance around -10% reflecting market volatility but strong one-year gains over 25%. Key influences include robust EPS estimates growing 6-7% annually and expansions in China and Boston, bolstering investor confidence despite compliance scrutiny.
Zions Bancorporation (ZION) operates as a regional powerhouse with $89 billion in assets, focusing on commercial and retail banking across 11 Western states under brands like Zions Bank and Amegy Bank. It excels in small-to-middle-market lending and public finance. Shares recently trade around $54, with steady volumes and YTD returns near -7%, supported by revenue growth from net interest income in recent quarters. Performance benefits from localized economic strength and shareholder returns, though sensitive to regional cycles; sentiment is positive on its attractive valuation and dividend yield around 3%.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—demonstrating strong win rates (up to 100%), profit factors, and annualized returns ranging from 63% to 279%—earn a spot in this dynamic section, with over 25 highlighted from 351 total bots. These include agents excelling in price action, swing trades, and sector-specific plays like tech or industrials, often posting 70-88% win rates and significant P/L on model portfolios. Traders can explore varying styles from short-term scalps to longer holds, gaining edges in today's markets. Visit Trending AI Robots to review live stats and copy top performers.
BAC, JPM, and ZION contrast sharply in scale and exposure: JPM's global diversification drives superior growth via investment banking (11.8% market share) and payments, while BAC emphasizes consumer and wealth segments for steady fees. ZION prioritizes regional commercial lending, offering higher yield potential but greater sensitivity to local economies. Recent momentum favors JPM with stronger EPS trajectory; risk factors include regulatory pressures for giants versus credit cycles for ZION. Valuation-wise, ZION's lower P/E appeals for value plays, while JPM trades at a premium on execution. Market sentiment tilts toward scale amid uncertainty, balancing trade-offs in stability versus upside.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors JPM based on trend consistency, diversified catalysts like payments growth, and relative positioning with upward earnings revisions outpacing peers. Its fortress balance sheet and market share gains suggest higher probability of outperformance in varying conditions, though BAC and ZION offer compelling value alternatives depending on rate paths.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and ZION’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZION’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +0.14% , and ZION (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +2.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.92%.
BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
ZION is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2026.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
@Regional Banks (+1.58% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAC | JPM | ZION | |
| Capitalization | 384B | 831B | 9.23B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -1.428 | -2.773 | 7.930 |
| P/E Ratio | 13.41 | 14.85 | 10.44 |
| Revenue | 113B | 182B | 3.39B |
| Total Cash | 25.4B | 21.7B | 771M |
| Total Debt | 366B | 500B | 3.47B |
BAC | JPM | ZION | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 34 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 15 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 48 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 34 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAC's Valuation (69) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (84) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ZION (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC's stock grew similarly to JPM’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (49) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZION (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s and somewhat faster than ZION’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ZION (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
ZION's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (21) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for JPM (48) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ZION's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and somewhat faster than JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (42) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ZION (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to BAC’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
| BAC | JPM | ZION | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 59% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VEA | 69.63 | 1.00 | +1.46% |
| Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | |||
| SCHQ | 31.60 | 0.26 | +0.83% |
| Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF | |||
| CANQ | 29.56 | 0.23 | +0.77% |
| Calamos Nasdaq® Equity & Income ETF | |||
| IG | 20.82 | 0.08 | +0.40% |
| Principal Investment Grd Corp Actv ETF | |||
| SOLM | 11.78 | -0.13 | -1.09% |
| Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Opt Inc ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.