BAP
Price
$331.94
Change
-$8.28 (-2.43%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.34B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
C
Price
$132.18
Change
+$2.84 (+2.20%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
225.45B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNC
Price
$224.81
Change
+$4.74 (+2.15%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
90.37B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP or C or PNC

Header iconBAP vs C vs PNC Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs C vs PNCBanner chart's image
BAP vs C vs PNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) vs. Citigroup Inc. (C) vs. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAP leads with strong YTD return of 11.30% and 1-year gain of 79.33%, driven by record earnings in Peru's financial sector.
  • C shows robust 1-year performance at 58.10% amid global restructuring, though YTD at 5.77% trails in recent volatility.
  • PNC offers stability with a P/E ratio of 12.27, recent acquisition of FirstBank, and projected Q1 EPS growth of 16.5%.
  • Valuation metrics favor PNC and BAP at lower P/E (12-13x) compared to C's 15.65x.
  • Emerging market exposure boosts BAP's growth, while U.S.-focused C and PNC emphasize diversification and capital returns.
  • Recent momentum highlights BAP's outperformance, with all three showing resilience in banking relative performance.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BAP, C, and PNC, three banks spanning emerging and U.S. markets. BAP dominates Peruvian universal banking, C leads in global diversified services, and PNC focuses on U.S. retail and corporate lending. Traders seeking growth may eye BAP's momentum, while investors prioritizing stability could favor PNC or C's scale. Amid recent market activity, including geopolitical tensions and rate shifts, this analysis highlights relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and market positioning for informed decisions in the current environment.

BAP Overview and Recent Performance

Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is a Peru-based financial holding company operating in universal banking, insurance, pensions, microfinance, and wealth management across Latin America. With a market cap of $25.35B and trailing P/E of 13.04, it reported record Q4 FY25 net income and strong loan growth outlook. Recent weeks saw shares around $319, with YTD return at 11.30% and 1-year at 79.33%, outperforming peers. Sentiment has been bolstered by governance updates, dividend policy refresh, and robust earnings (EPS TTM $24.50), amid Peru's economic recovery and microfinance expansion influencing positive price behavior.

C Overview and Recent Performance

Citigroup Inc. (C) is a global diversified financial services firm with segments in services, markets, banking, U.S. personal banking, and wealth management, operating worldwide. Market cap stands at $191.36B, with P/E at 15.65. Shares trade near $109, posting YTD 5.77% and 1-year 58.10% returns. Recent market activity reflects restructuring progress, including Banamex stake sales and Russia exit, adding to CET1 capital. Analyst targets average $133.52, with price dips tied to broader sector volatility and macroeconomic headwinds, yet supported by fee income growth initiatives.

PNC Overview and Recent Performance

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) provides U.S.-focused retail banking, corporate & institutional banking, and asset management through branches and digital channels. With $82.35B market cap and P/E of 12.27, shares hover at $203. YTD return is 1.68%, 1-year 20.09%. Recent performance includes FirstBank acquisition completion, boosting assets to $574B, and Q1 EPS forecast at $4.09 (up 16.5%). A 12.5% pullback in recent weeks reflects macro pressures, offset by Zacks Buy upgrade and efficiency via AI, driving steady deposit growth and capital returns.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers. Out of 351 total AI bots, AI analysis curates 25 trending ones suited to current market conditions, spanning stocks, ETFs, and crypto across growth sectors like technology, energy, and finance. These bots employ diverse strategies—momentum, pattern recognition, swing trading—on timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute charts, with filters for volatility (low to high) and analysis type (technical or fundamental). Historical performances have shown annualized returns up to 227%, win rates of 70-80%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5 in brokerages, though results vary. Explore these curated bots to align with your trading style and market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAP, C, and PNC differ in business models: BAP's emerging-market universal banking with microfinance contrasts C's global investment and consumer services against PNC's U.S. retail-corporate focus. Growth drivers include BAP's loan expansion (41% earnings surge), C's restructuring (4-5% revenue CAGR to 2026), and PNC's acquisitions (8% loan growth projected). Recent momentum favors BAP (YTD +11%), over C (+6%) and PNC (+2%). Risks: BAP's regional volatility vs. U.S. regulatory exposure for others. Valuation sensitivity shows PNC cheapest (P/E 12.3x), BAP growth premium (13x), C higher (15.7x). Sentiment tilts to BAP's outperformance amid stable U.S. peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BAP due to superior trend consistency, with YTD +11.30% and 1-year +79.33% reflecting strong catalysts like record earnings and loan growth in Peru. Relative to C and PNC, BAP shows higher momentum and attractive valuation, positioning it probabilistically for continued outperformance in emerging banking trends, though U.S. stability offers trade-offs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (BAP: $331.94C: $132.18PNC: $224.81)
Brand notoriety: C and PNC are notable and BAP is not notable
BAP and PNC are part of the Regional Banks industry, and C is in the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 178%, C: 145%, PNC: 106%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $26.34B, C: $225.45B, PNC: $90.37B
$BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.34B. $PNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $ $90.37B. $C [@Major Banks] has a market capitalization of $ $225.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $ $149.17B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $ $831.42B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $ $9.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $ $150.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and PNC’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • C’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP and C are a better buy in the long-term than PNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while C’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PNC’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • C’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the short-term than PNC, which in turn is a better option than BAP.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.00% price change this week, while C (@Major Banks) price change was +6.26% , and PNC (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

C is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

PNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Major Banks (+2.59% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
C($225B) has a higher market cap than PNC($90.4B) and BAP($26.3B). C has higher P/E ratio than BAP and PNC: C (16.34) vs BAP (13.17) and PNC (13.06). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 15.659 vs. C (13.865) and PNC (9.364). BAP has less debt than PNC and C: BAP (23.5B) vs PNC (57.1B) and C (368B). C has higher revenues than BAP and PNC: C (85.2B) vs BAP (23.3B) and PNC (23.1B).
BAPCPNC
Capitalization26.3B225B90.4B
EBITDAN/AN/AN/A
Gain YTD15.65913.8659.364
P/E Ratio13.1716.3413.06
Revenue23.3B85.2B23.1B
Total CashN/A23.5B6.78B
Total Debt23.5B368B57.1B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs C vs PNC: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
C
PNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
733628
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62153
SMR RATING
1..100
525
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42618
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341841
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as C (76) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as PNC (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as C (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PNC (53) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to C’s and somewhat faster than PNC’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (2) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAP (5) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as PNC (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PNC (18) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to PNC’s and somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.

C's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAP (34) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as PNC (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPCPNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XAIX46.110.66
+1.44%
Xtrackers Artfcl Intlgc and Big Dt ETF
ITA231.942.91
+1.27%
iShares US Aerospace & Defense ETF
QQH74.920.82
+1.11%
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
SDCP25.750.03
+0.12%
Virtus Newfleet Short Dur Cor Pls Bd ETF
OPER100.300.04
+0.03%
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

PNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNC
1D Price
Change %
PNC100%
+2.15%
CFG - PNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
USB - PNC
88%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
TFC - PNC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
ASB - PNC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
HBAN - PNC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
More