BAP
Price
$331.94
Change
-$8.28 (-2.43%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.34B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBAN
Price
$16.85
Change
+$0.28 (+1.69%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
34.33B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZION
Price
$62.73
Change
+$1.19 (+1.93%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.23B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP or HBAN or ZION

Header iconBAP vs HBAN vs ZION Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs HBAN vs ZIONBanner chart's image
BAP vs HBAN vs ZION Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) vs. Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) vs. Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAP leads with strong YTD return of 14.84% and 91.41% over one year, driven by robust earnings and Peruvian market growth, trading at a P/E of 13.30.
  • HBAN offers scale with $32.72B market cap and 3.85% dividend yield, but YTD performance at 7.09% reflects merger integration pressures in U.S. regional banking.
  • ZION appears undervalued at P/E 9.28 and $8.25B market cap, with steady 3.23% yield, though recent leadership changes introduce operational uncertainty.
  • All three regional banks show attractive yields above 3%, lower betas under 1.0 indicating relative stability versus broader market volatility.
  • BAP's international diversification contrasts HBAN and ZION's U.S.-focused exposure, impacting relative performance amid shifting interest rates.
  • Recent market activity highlights BAP's momentum from Q4 earnings, while U.S. peers face sector headwinds.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BAP, HBAN, and ZION, three regional banks representing diverse geographic footprints in financial services. BAP operates primarily in Latin America, while HBAN and ZION focus on U.S. markets. Investors seeking exposure to banking sector stability, dividend income, or growth potential amid interest rate fluctuations and economic shifts will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning. This review draws on recent financial data to highlight contrasts in momentum, risk, and catalysts.

BAP Overview and Recent Performance

Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is a leading financial services holding company headquartered in Lima, Peru, operating through universal banking, insurance, microfinance, and investment segments across Latin America. In recent market activity, BAP shares have shown resilience, with a YTD return of 14.84% and 91.41% over one year, trading around $329.60. The stock's market cap stands at $26.16B, with a P/E ratio of 13.30 and beta of 0.90. Sentiment has been bolstered by Q4 2025 earnings highlighting record net income and loan growth outlook, alongside director nominees for the 2026 AGM. Broader strength in Peruvian economic recovery and diversified revenue streams have driven outperformance versus U.S. peers, though currency risks temper gains.

HBAN Overview and Recent Performance

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is a regional bank holding company based in Columbus, Ohio, providing commercial, consumer, and mortgage banking services across the Midwest and South. Shares recently traded near $16.12, with a YTD return of 7.09% and 10.61% over one year, supported by a $32.72B market cap, P/E of 11.60, beta of 0.97, and 3.85% dividend yield. Recent weeks have featured merger developments with Cadence Bank, expanding Southern reach, alongside presentations at financial conferences. While integration execution influences sentiment, steady deposit growth and analyst target raises reflect confidence in inorganic expansion amid U.S. regional banking dynamics.

ZION Overview and Recent Performance

Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) operates community-focused banks across 11 Western U.S. states, emphasizing commercial and public finance services. Trading around $55.78, the stock posts a YTD return of 4.03% and 14.95% over one year, with an $8.25B market cap, P/E of 9.28, beta of 0.82, and 3.23% yield. Recent activity includes technology leadership changes and Greenwich awards, amid share price weakness. Operational enhancements and conference presentations underscore efforts to navigate sector pressures, with lower beta signaling reduced volatility relative to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum, hedging, and sector rotation across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, delivering annualized returns ranging from +13.90% to +213.42%, win rates of 53%–95%, and profit factors up to 25.83. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents on SOXL yielding +112% annualized and finance bots trading GS, JPM, and MS with +58.85% returns. This elite group highlights bots excelling in volatility, tech, energy, and infrastructure. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify strategies suited to today’s environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAP, HBAN, and ZION operate in regional banking but diverge in scale and exposure: BAP's Latin American diversification fuels superior growth drivers like loan expansion, contrasting U.S. peers' domestic focus amid rate sensitivity. Valuation-wise, ZION's 9.28 P/E suggests a discount versus HBAN (11.60) and BAP (13.30), trading at lower multiples despite comparable yields. Recent momentum favors BAP's 14.84% YTD, while HBAN leverages mergers for deposits and ZION emphasizes Western commercial lending. Risks include BAP's EM currency exposure, HBAN's integration costs, and ZION's operational transitions; sentiment tilts positive on BAP's earnings catalysts versus U.S. sector caution.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor BAP due to its trend consistency, standout relative positioning with 91% one-year gains, and catalysts from earnings growth and diversification. While HBAN offers scale and ZION value appeal, BAP's lower beta and momentum edge suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, contingent on sustained regional stability.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (BAP: $331.94HBAN: $16.85ZION: $62.73)
Brand notoriety: BAP and ZION are not notable and HBAN is notable
The three companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 178%, HBAN: 90%, ZION: 100%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $26.34B, HBAN: $34.33B, ZION: $9.23B
$BAP is valued at $26.34B, while HBAN has a market capitalization of $34.33B, and ZION's market capitalization is $9.23B. The market cap for tickers in this @Regional Banks ranges from $149.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Regional Banks industry is $9.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBAN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and ZION’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZION’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than HBAN, which in turn is a better option than ZION.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBAN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZION’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBAN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZION’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBAN and ZION are a better buy in the short-term than BAP.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.00% price change this week, while HBAN (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.87% , and ZION (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

HBAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

ZION is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBAN($34.3B) has a higher market cap than BAP($26.3B) and ZION($9.23B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than HBAN and ZION: BAP (13.17) vs HBAN (12.12) and ZION (10.44). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 15.659 vs. ZION (7.930) and HBAN (-1.894). ZION has less debt than HBAN and BAP: ZION (3.47B) vs HBAN (18.5B) and BAP (23.5B). BAP has higher revenues than HBAN and ZION: BAP (23.3B) vs HBAN (8.13B) and ZION (3.39B).
BAPHBANZION
Capitalization26.3B34.3B9.23B
EBITDAN/AN/AN/A
Gain YTD15.659-1.8947.930
P/E Ratio13.1712.1210.44
Revenue23.3B8.13B3.39B
Total CashN/A1.78B771M
Total Debt23.5B18.5B3.47B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs HBAN vs ZION: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
HBAN
ZION
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
732238
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66276
SMR RATING
1..100
579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
424815
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
344645
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (76) and is in the same range as ZION (87). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to HBAN’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (62) and is significantly better than the same rating for ZION (76). This means that BAP's stock grew somewhat faster than HBAN’s and significantly faster than ZION’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's SMR Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (7) and is in the same range as ZION (9). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to HBAN’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.

ZION's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (42) and is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (48). This means that ZION's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and somewhat faster than HBAN’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ZION (45) and is in the same range as HBAN (46). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to ZION’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPHBANZION
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZION
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLYV101.751.81
+1.81%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm CpValETF
IDUB27.010.35
+1.31%
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
RFM14.410.11
+0.77%
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund
PHLLF4.14N/A
N/A
PETERSHILL PARTNERS PLC.
KLXY26.44N/A
N/A
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
-2.43%
IFS - BAP
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
BSAC - BAP
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
ITUB - BAP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
BBD - BAP
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
CIB - BAP
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More