This stock comparison examines BAP, KEY, and ZION, three financial services firms offering distinct regional exposures within banking and related services. BAP provides diversified operations in Latin America, while KEY and ZION focus on U.S. retail, commercial, and wealth management. Traders seeking relative performance insights in the banking sector, particularly amid interest rate fluctuations and economic shifts, will find value in analyzing their momentum, valuations, and sentiment. This review highlights recent market positioning to aid informed comparisons.
Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is a Peru-based financial holding company operating in universal banking, insurance, microfinance, and investment management across Latin America, including Peru, Colombia, and Bolivia. In recent market activity, BAP has demonstrated robust performance, with shares trading around $325 and a YTD return of 13.48%, far exceeding the S&P 500's 3.12%. The 1-year return stands at 85.88%, supported by a trailing P/E of 13.07, ROE of 19.12%, and dividend yield of 3.38%. Recent Q4 2025 earnings highlighted record net income and loan growth projections of 8.5%, alongside director nominees for the 2026 AGM and a governance refresh, boosting sentiment despite a slight earnings miss. These factors have driven positive price behavior amid emerging market resilience.
KeyCorp (KEY), headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, operates through Consumer Bank and Commercial Bank segments, offering deposits, lending, wealth management, and capital markets services across the U.S. Shares recently hovered near $19, with a YTD return of 7.23% and 1-year return of 26.45%, trailing the S&P 500 over 52 weeks at 19.62% versus 16.86%. Key metrics include a trailing P/E of 12.43, ROE of 9.48%, and a high dividend yield of 4.34%. In recent weeks, sentiment has improved with Morgan Stanley raising its price target to $26 on expected loan growth and NIM expansion, alongside community investments like $400,000 grants and new branch developments. Q4 FY25 EPS beat estimates, though regional bank pressures have tempered momentum.
Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION), based in Salt Lake City, Utah, delivers banking products via subsidiaries like Zions Bank and Amegy Bank across western U.S. states, emphasizing commercial real estate, retail banking, and wealth management. Trading around $53, it posted a YTD return of 8.64% and 1-year return of 16.76%, with a low trailing P/E of 8.84, ROE of 13.52%, and dividend yield of 3.39%. Recent activity shows share weakness, with declines over the past week and month, offset by Q4 earnings beats on NII and fees, Baird's Outperform upgrade, and technology leadership changes. Revenues rose in 2025, but broader sector headwinds have influenced cautious sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots from a library of over 350, curated for current market conditions across sectors like energy, semiconductors, and aerospace. These bots deliver impressive stats, with annualized returns ranging from 16% to over 200%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors up to 25. For instance, one bot on oil and semiconductors achieved +90.67% annualized return with a 60% win rate and 2.49 profit factor, while another in small-caps hit +96.96%. Each employs unique strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, from swing trading leveraged ETFs to pattern recognition in growth stocks. Explore these high-potential options tailored to today's volatility.
BAP, KEY, and ZION share financial services exposure but diverge in geography and scale: BAP's Latin American diversification contrasts U.S.-centric regional models of KEY and ZION. Growth drivers favor BAP's loan expansion and digital ecosystem versus KEY's NIM improvements and ZION's revenue growth. Recent momentum is strongest for BAP, with KEY gaining from upgrades but ZION lagging amid weakness. Risks include emerging market volatility for BAP and U.S. rate sensitivity for the others. Valuation-wise, ZION appears cheapest (P/E 8.84), KEY offers yield appeal, while BAP commands premium ROE. Sentiment tilts positive for BAP on earnings strength, with regional peers navigating sector pressures.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BAP due to its consistent trend outperformance, highest ROE, and catalysts like loan growth and strong Q4 results, positioning it ahead in relative stability amid banking sector dynamics. KEY and ZION show promise via upgrades and yields but lag in momentum and returns probability.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and ZION’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZION’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.64% price change this week, while KEY (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.76% , and ZION (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +6.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.
BAP is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
KEY is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
ZION is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAP | KEY | ZION | |
| Capitalization | 28B | 23.2B | 9.08B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 22.777 | 5.932 | 6.278 |
| P/E Ratio | 14.14 | 14.24 | 10.28 |
| Revenue | 23.3B | 7.29B | 3.39B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 771M |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 11B | 3.47B |
BAP | KEY | ZION | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 24 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 76 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 8 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 20 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 88 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAP's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KEY (80) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ZION (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to KEY’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for KEY (76) in the Major Banks industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ZION (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew significantly faster than KEY’s and significantly faster than ZION’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's SMR Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KEY (8) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ZION (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to KEY’s and similarly to ZION’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ZION (24) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as BAP (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KEY's stock grew similarly to ZION’s and similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ZION (47) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KEY (88) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to ZION’s and somewhat faster than KEY’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | KEY | ZION | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 11 days ago 70% | 28 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VYLD | 27.65 | 0.86 | +3.21% |
| Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045 | |||
| QTUM | 116.14 | 0.31 | +0.27% |
| Defiance Quantum ETF | |||
| CGRO | 23.27 | N/A | N/A |
| CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF | |||
| MFDX | 41.60 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF | |||
| FNGD | 59.86 | -1.73 | -2.81% |
| MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEY has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KEY jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.