Advertisement
BTI or CL or STZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BTI offers the highest dividend yield at 5.62% with a low PE ratio of 12.78, supported by strong 1-year returns of 54.12% and growth in smokeless products.
- CL leads YTD performance at 17.76%, driven by emerging market strength, though its PE ratio of 35.17 reflects premium valuation.
- STZ faces headwinds from softer demand and CEO transition, with YTD gains of 9.50% but longer-term underperformance versus benchmarks.
- Consumer defensive positioning benefits all three amid volatility, but BTI's undervaluation and dividend appeal stand out in recent market activity.
- CL and STZ show analyst price targets suggesting upside, while BTI garners buy ratings from firms like UBS.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs: stability in staples versus growth in smokeless and beverages.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BTI, a global tobacco leader transitioning to smokeless products; CL, a dominant player in oral and personal care; and STZ, a premium beer and wine producer. These consumer defensive names offer resilience in volatile markets, appealing to income-focused investors seeking dividends and growth-oriented traders eyeing sector rotations. By analyzing recent performance, valuations, and catalysts, this review aids in understanding relative positioning for portfolio allocation in the current environment.
BTI Overview and Recent Performance
British American Tobacco (BTI) operates in combustibles, vapor, heated, and modern oral products worldwide. Trading around $59.41 with a 52-week range of $37.96–$63.22, it boasts a market cap of $128.8B and PE of 12.78. Dividend yield stands at 5.62%, attracting yield seekers. Recent market activity shows YTD gains of 4.93% and 1-year returns of 54.12%, outpacing benchmarks like FTSE 100. Sentiment has been buoyed by 2025 revenue and profit growth in smokeless categories, despite share price fluctuations. Analysts view it as undervalued amid volatility, with UBS maintaining a buy rating and average targets around $60.90.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) manufactures oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition products globally. At $92.49, within a 52-week range of $74.55–$99.33, its market cap is $74.1B with a PE of 35.17. Dividend yield is 2.25%. YTD performance reaches 17.76%, though 1-year return is 2.80%. Recent weeks reflect strength from emerging markets and AI-driven efficiency, amid broader consumer staples rotation. Analyst targets average $97.21, with Barclays raising to $88 at equal-weight. External factors like oil prices influence costs, but operational focus supports sentiment.
STZ Overview and Recent Performance
Constellation Brands (STZ) produces beer, wine, and spirits, featuring brands like Corona and Modelo. Priced at $150.09 in a 52-week range of $126.45–$196.91, market cap is $26.1B with PE of 23.60 and yield of 2.72%. YTD up 9.50% and 1-year at 18.73%. Recent activity includes a CEO transition to Nicholas Fink amid softer demand and competition, impacting sentiment. Efforts target premiumization and brands like Pacifico. Analysts hold equal-weight with $170.73 average target, noting potential undervaluation despite challenges.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like technical patterns, fundamentals, and risk management across timeframes from minutes to days. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as sector rotations and volatility—earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to +215%, win rates of 60–95%, and profit factors to 25+. Examples include GoldCore KGC at +90% annualized (64% win rate) and OIL & Semiconductor at +93% (+2.52 profit factor). These bots suit various styles, from short-term momentum to long-term holds. Explore the page to identify suitable options for your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BTI, CL, and STZ span tobacco, staples, and beverages, all defensive but with distinct drivers. BTI's low PE (12.78) and top yield (5.62%) contrast CL's high PE (35.17) tied to growth, and STZ's mid-range (23.60) amid demand risks. Momentum favors CL YTD, BTI over 1-year. Risks include regulatory pressures for BTI, commodity costs for CL, and consumption shifts for STZ. Valuation sensitivity is lowest for BTI, with sentiment boosted by smokeless pivot versus STZ's transitions.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BTI due to trend consistency in long-term returns, high yield stability, undervaluation signals, and catalysts like smokeless growth. While CL shows short-term momentum and STZ offers premium brand potential, BTI's relative positioning provides higher probability of outperformance in defensive rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BTI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BTI (@Tobacco) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.06% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated +7.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
BTI is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tobacco (+1.70% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.37% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| BTI | CL | STZ | |
| Capitalization | 128B | 69B | 28.3B |
| EBITDA | 14.1B | 3.96B | 2.47B |
| Gain YTD | 5.450 | 9.551 | 18.970 |
| P/E Ratio | 12.58 | 32.71 | 16.97 |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 20.4B | 9.38B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.29B | 152M |
| Total Debt | N/A | 8.55B | 10.7B |
BTI | CL | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 62 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 98 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 5 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 56 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 33 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTI's Valuation (12) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BTI's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that BTI's stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BTI (99) in the Tobacco industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than BTI’s over the last 12 months.
BTI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BTI's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTI (93) in the Tobacco industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (98) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than BTI’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| BTI | CL | STZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 44% | 5 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 38% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDTS | 21.55 | 0.12 | +0.56% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Sep | |||
| DFAU | 47.12 | 0.26 | +0.55% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
| FAB | 97.08 | 0.43 | +0.44% |
| First Trust Multi Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| LJAN | 24.50 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jan | |||
| VUSE | 65.38 | 0.05 | +0.08% |
| Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | |||