BTI
Price
$55.66
Change
-$1.40 (-2.45%)
Updated
Apr 21, 01:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.26B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNST
Price
$75.75
Change
-$1.48 (-1.92%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:14 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.52B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$158.89
Change
-$0.93 (-0.58%)
Updated
Apr 21, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.71B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTI or MNST or STZ

Header iconBTI vs MNST vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts BTI vs MNST vs STZBanner chart's image
BTI vs MNST vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BTI delivered strong long-term returns of over 50% in the past year, supported by growth in smokeless products, though recent share price showed weakness amid analyst fair value estimates around $59.
  • MNST reported robust Q4 revenue growth of 17.6% to $2.13 billion, beating estimates, but stock declined post-earnings due to cost pressures from tariffs and inflation.
  • STZ faced demand challenges and leadership changes, with shares down over recent months, yet premium beer brands like Modelo provide some resilience in a volatile market.
  • All three operate in consumer staples, offering defensive qualities, but BTI stands out with undervaluation signals and dividend appeal relative to growth-oriented MNST and challenged STZ.
  • Recent market activity highlights shifts in sentiment, with tobacco stability contrasting beverage sector pressures from costs and consumer trends.
  • AI-driven analysis favors consistent trends and lower volatility for positioning in current conditions.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BTI, MNST, and STZ, three prominent names in the consumer staples sector spanning tobacco and beverages. Investors seeking defensive plays amid market volatility or traders eyeing relative performance in staples will find value here. These companies navigate shifting consumer preferences toward healthier alternatives, cost inflation, and economic uncertainty. By analyzing recent market activity, business drivers, and sentiment, this review aids informed decisions on BTI vs. MNST vs. STZ stock comparison and positioning.

BTI Overview and Recent Performance

British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) is a global leader in tobacco and nicotine products, emphasizing a transition to non-combustible options like vapes and oral pouches. In recent market activity, BTI shares exhibited weakness despite robust long-term returns exceeding 50% over the past year and strong 2025 results with revenue and profit growth in smokeless categories. Analysts highlight potential undervaluation, with fair value estimates near $59, about 26% above recent levels, bolstering sentiment. Influences include strategic shifts reducing reliance on traditional cigarettes and steady demand for newer products, though regulatory pressures and broader economic factors temper short-term momentum.

MNST Overview and Recent Performance

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks and related beverages, holding a strong position in the non-alcoholic segment with brands like Monster Energy. Recent weeks saw solid Q4 performance, with net sales up 17.6% to $2.13 billion and earnings beating estimates, driven by global share gains. However, shares declined around 9% post-earnings amid concerns over rising costs, including aluminum cans, tariffs, and inflation, which offset gross margin gains. Sentiment reflects optimism for institutional interest and long-term growth but caution on near-term expenses and promotional pressures impacting profitability.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) focuses on beer, wine, and spirits, with key brands like Modelo Especial and Corona leading its portfolio. In recent market activity, STZ shares faced downward pressure, declining amid demand softness, economic uncertainty affecting Hispanic consumers, and a CEO transition to Nicholas Fink. Premiumization efforts show promise in beer volumes, but overall sales volatility and leadership shifts have weighed on performance. Sentiment balances resilience in core beer demand against broader alcoholic beverage challenges.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. AI analyzes performance metrics to spotlight the most suitable for current volatility, featuring over 25 bots in sectors like aerospace, energy, semiconductors, and consumer staples. Standouts include annualized returns from +14% to over +215%, win rates up to 95%, and profit factors reaching 25+, with examples like +133% return on multi-sector portfolios and 91% win rates on ETFs. These bots vary in styles—from swing trading to high-frequency signals—offering low to high volatility filters. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify tools aligned with your strategy in today’s market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BTI, MNST, and STZ share consumer staples exposure but diverge in business models: BTI's tobacco stability contrasts MNST's high-growth energy drinks and STZ's premium alcohol focus. Growth drivers favor MNST's sales momentum, while BTI benefits from smokeless transitions and dividends; STZ relies on beer premiumization amid wine softness. Recent momentum shows BTI resilient long-term but weak short-term, MNST volatile post-earnings, and STZ lagging. Risks include regulation for BTI, costs for MNST, and demand for STZ. Valuation sensitivity positions BTI as undervalued, with market sentiment tilting toward defensive staples amid uncertainty.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BTI due to its trend consistency in long-term returns, undervaluation relative to peers, and stability from diversified nicotine products. While MNST offers growth potential and STZ beer catalysts, BTI's lower volatility and positive analyst signals provide stronger relative positioning probabilistically in the prevailing market environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (BTI: $57.06MNST: $77.23STZ: $159.82)
Brand notoriety: BTI and MNST are not notable and STZ is notable
BTI represents the Tobacco industry, MNST is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTI: 61%, MNST: 134%, STZ: 103%
Market capitalization -- BTI: $121.26B, MNST: $75.52B, STZ: $27.71B
BTI [@Tobacco] is valued at $121.26B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $75.52B. STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $27.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $245.55B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $324.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $147.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $32.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than BTI, which in turn is a better option than STZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than BTI.

Price Growth

BTI (@Tobacco) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.74% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTI is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (-0.33% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.29% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.39% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTI($121B) has a higher market cap than MNST($75.5B) and STZ($27.7B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than STZ and BTI: MNST (39.81) vs STZ (16.63) and BTI (12.09). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 16.599 vs. BTI (2.242) and MNST (0.730). BTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.1B vs. MNST (2.53B) and STZ (2.47B). BTI has higher revenues than STZ and MNST: BTI (25.6B) vs STZ (9.38B) and MNST (8.29B).
BTIMNSTSTZ
Capitalization121B75.5B27.7B
EBITDA14.1B2.53B2.47B
Gain YTD2.2420.73016.599
P/E Ratio12.0939.8116.63
Revenue25.6B8.29B9.38B
Total CashN/A2.77B152M
Total DebtN/A199M10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTI vs MNST vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
BTI
MNST
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
736960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1324100
SMR RATING
1..100
993555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
505051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
966381
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTI's Valuation (11) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as STZ (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that BTI's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

BTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that BTI's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BTI (99) in the Tobacco industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and somewhat faster than BTI’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BTI (50) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as STZ (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to BTI’s and similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BTI (96) in the Tobacco industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and somewhat faster than BTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTIMNSTSTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHA32.420.18
+0.56%
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
FTAG30.130.08
+0.27%
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
UCRD21.58N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF
LEMB42.50-0.06
-0.14%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
CEGX16.68-1.07
-6.03%
Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.66%
CCEP - MNST
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
KO - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
PEP - MNST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CELH - MNST
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
KDP - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More