BUD
Price
$75.05
Change
-$0.71 (-0.94%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
147.49B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CL
Price
$83.53
Change
-$2.28 (-2.66%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
67.02B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMB
Price
$98.54
Change
-$0.30 (-0.30%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
32.71B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUD or CL or KMB

Header iconBUD vs CL vs KMB Comparison
Open Charts BUD vs CL vs KMBBanner chart's image
BUD vs CL vs KMB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BUD leads with positive YTD returns around 5-6% and 1-year gains of about 12%, bolstered by recent earnings beats and market share gains.
  • CL shows YTD gains near 9% but trails over 1 year with a roughly 5% decline, supported by steady organic sales growth.
  • KMB lags with YTD declines around 3% and a sharp 28% drop over the past year, amid share price weakness despite earnings strength.
  • All three operate in consumer staples, offering defensive qualities, but BUD exhibits stronger recent momentum while KMB trades at more attractive forward valuations.
  • Dividend yields remain competitive across the group, with KMB at over 5%, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • Recent market activity highlights contrasts in volume trends and analyst sentiment, influencing relative performance.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines BUD, CL, and KMB, three established players in the consumer staples sector. Anheuser-Busch InBev dominates global brewing, Colgate-Palmolive leads in oral care, and Kimberly-Clark excels in personal care products. Traders seeking momentum and short-term opportunities, alongside long-term investors prioritizing stability and dividends, will find value in analyzing their recent price behavior, earnings momentum, and sector positioning. In a volatile market environment, these stocks offer insights into defensive strategies versus growth trade-offs.

BUD Overview and Recent Performance

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD), the world's largest brewer, produces brands like Budweiser and Stella Artois, with operations spanning over 100 countries. In recent market activity, BUD shares have traded around $68, reflecting YTD gains of approximately 5.6% and 1-year returns near 12%. Recent quarters showed normalized EBITDA growth of 4.9% and underlying EPS up 6%, driven by market share gains in two-thirds of its markets and improved momentum. Influences include strategic marketing spend of $7.4 billion and anticipation of events like the Super Bowl and World Cup. Sentiment has been positive post-earnings beats, though volumes faced slight declines amid global demand pressures.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is a leading global provider of oral, personal, and home care products, with strong brands in toothpaste and household essentials. Shares have hovered near $86 in recent weeks, posting YTD returns around 9% despite a 5% 1-year dip. Q4 results featured net sales up 5.8% to $5.23 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.95, surpassing estimates, with organic growth at 2.2%. Steady demand for essentials in Latin America and Europe supported performance, alongside a dividend hike to $0.53 per share. Legal challenges on product labeling tempered sentiment, but analyst upgrades highlight growth potential.

KMB Overview and Recent Performance

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) manufactures personal care and consumer tissue products, including Huggies and Kleenex, with a focus on hygiene essentials. Trading around $96, KMB has seen YTD declines of about 3% and a 28% 1-year drop, pressured by a 20% six-month slide. Q4 adjusted EPS rose 24% to $1.86 amid organic sales growth of 2.1%, with gross margins steady at 37%. Challenges from inflation, competition, and the pending Kenvue acquisition weighed on shares, though productivity gains and a dividend increase to $1.28 signal resilience.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers. Tickeron offers over 350 AI trading bots employing diverse strategies—from momentum and pattern recognition to sector rotation and price action analysis—across various timeframes like 60-minute charts and swing trades. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this dynamic section based on AI analysis of real-time performance in current market conditions, highlighting those with strong annualized returns up to 227%, win rates of 70-80%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5 in areas like oil, semiconductors, and technology. These bots adapt to volatility, delivering signals for copy trading. Investors can explore this curated selection to identify suitable tools for their portfolio.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BUD, CL, and KMB all anchor consumer staples, providing recession-resistant exposure but differing in sub-sectors: beverages for BUD, oral care for CL, and tissues for KMB. Growth drivers vary—BUD leverages global events and premiumization, CL benefits from essential demand, while KMB focuses on productivity amid M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Recent momentum favors BUD with positive returns versus peers' declines. Risk factors include volume softness for BUD, litigation for CL, and integration costs for KMB. Valuation sensitivity shows KMB at forward P/E around 13x with 5%+ yield, BUD near 18x, and CL higher; betas under 0.8 indicate low volatility. Market sentiment tilts toward BUD's catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BUD due to superior trend consistency, positive relative performance, and near-term catalysts like profit growth outlook and market share stability. While CL offers balanced growth and KMB compelling valuation, BUD's momentum positions it probabilistically stronger in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (BUD: $75.05CL: $83.53KMB: $98.54)
Brand notoriety: BUD and CL are notable and KMB is not notable
CL and KMB are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and BUD is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUD: 75%, CL: 84%, KMB: 79%
Market capitalization -- BUD: $147.49B, CL: $67.02B, KMB: $32.71B
$CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $67.02B. $KMB’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $32.71B. $BUD [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $ $147.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $335.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $ $147.49B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $ $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KMB’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than CL, which in turn is a better option than BUD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUD’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KMB’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUD’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUD is a better buy in the short-term than KMB, which in turn is a better option than CL.

Price Growth

BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.08% , and KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.30% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUD($147B) has a higher market cap than CL($67B) and KMB($32.7B). CL has higher P/E ratio than BUD and KMB: CL (31.76) vs BUD (22.14) and KMB (20.28). BUD YTD gains are higher at: 17.192 vs. CL (7.016) and KMB (-1.123). BUD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21B vs. CL (3.96B) and KMB (3.11B). KMB has less debt than CL and BUD: KMB (7.3B) vs CL (8.55B) and BUD (73B). BUD has higher revenues than CL and KMB: BUD (59.3B) vs CL (20.4B) and KMB (16.4B).
BUDCLKMB
Capitalization147B67B32.7B
EBITDA21B3.96B3.11B
Gain YTD17.1927.016-1.123
P/E Ratio22.1431.7620.28
Revenue59.3B20.4B16.4B
Total Cash11.8BN/A774M
Total Debt73B8.55B7.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUD vs CL vs KMB: Fundamental Ratings
BUD
CL
KMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
131060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7070100
SMR RATING
1..100
75511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
465762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
664653
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KMB's stock grew somewhat faster than BUD’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

BUD's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BUD (75) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and significantly faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.

BUD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as BUD (66) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUDCLKMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARZ35.250.33
+0.94%
TrueShares Structured Outcome March ETF
TOAK28.680.04
+0.15%
Twin Oak Short Hrzn Abs Ret ETF
HAPS32.92N/A
N/A
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
ACWI150.41-0.49
-0.32%
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
DBEU51.41-0.20
-0.39%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
-0.30%
CL - KMB
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
PG - KMB
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
CLX - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
CHD - KMB
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
KVUE - KMB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More