Advertisement
BUD or CL or UL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BUD shares have shown YTD gains around 4-5%, buoyed by Q4 earnings beats, but faced recent pullbacks amid broader market pressures.
- CL delivered resilient organic sales growth in emerging markets and raised its dividend, with YTD performance up approximately 8% despite monthly declines.
- UL reported 3.5% underlying sales growth for 2025, with strategic portfolio shifts toward higher-margin segments, achieving modest YTD returns near 5%.
- All three consumer staples stocks exhibit defensive qualities, but CL stands out for earnings momentum and stability in essentials demand.
- Recent volatility has pressured valuations, with BUD and CL showing stronger relative YTD positioning than broader indices.
- Tickeron's AI bots highlight consumer staples strategies with win rates up to 73% and returns exceeding 70% annualized in select portfolios.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BUD, CL, and UL, three leaders in the consumer staples sector spanning beverages, oral care, and household products. These companies offer defensive exposure amid economic uncertainty, with steady demand for essentials. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors eyeing long-term stability in consumer goods will find value here, particularly as recent earnings and strategic moves influence market positioning and sentiment shifts.
BUD Overview and Recent Performance
Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD), the world's largest brewer, boasts a portfolio including Budweiser, Corona, and Stella Artois, with operations across global and local champions. In recent market activity, BUD exceeded fourth-quarter profit and revenue projections, driving positive sentiment despite soft volumes in select regions like China and Brazil. Shares have posted YTD gains of about 4.44%, outperforming local benchmarks, though recent weeks saw declines of around 2-3% amid macroeconomic pressures and currency headwinds. Key influences include anticipation of 2026 catalysts like major sporting events boosting volumes, alongside ongoing portfolio optimization.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) specializes in oral, personal, home care, and pet nutrition products under brands like Colgate, Palmolive, and Hill’s. Recent performance reflects strength in emerging markets, with Q4 2025 organic sales growth and earnings surpassing estimates, supported by steady essentials demand. YTD returns hover near 8%, with shares resilient despite monthly dips of about 10% tied to broader sector rotation. Sentiment has been bolstered by dividend increases to $0.53 quarterly and focus on AI-driven productivity, offsetting raw material inflation. Broader stability stems from global reach and innovation in core categories.
UL Overview and Recent Performance
Unilever (UL) operates in beauty & wellbeing, personal care, home care, and foods, featuring Dove, Hellmann’s, and Knorr. For full-year 2025, it achieved 3.5% underlying sales growth with 1.5% volume increase, driven by Power Brands and margin expansion to 20%. YTD performance approximates 5%, with recent shares stable amid portfolio reshaping, including ice cream demerger and food unit review for potential spin-off. Influences include emerging market momentum and €1.5 billion share buyback, countering currency headwinds and fostering focus on higher-growth segments like beauty.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most promising, adapting to volatility, earn a spot in this dynamic section—currently featuring 25 bots out of 351 total. Stats showcase impressive ranges: annualized returns from 15% to 188%, win rates of 55-89%, and profit factors up to 6.11. Examples include consumer staples bots with 70%+ returns and 60% win rates, alongside semiconductor and volatility strategies. These bots employ varied approaches like swing trading and pattern recognition for stocks, ETFs, and more. Explore Tickeron’s AI tools to identify bots suited to current trends and enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BUD, CL, and UL anchor consumer staples but diverge in models: BUD leverages premium beer volumes with event-driven growth, while CL and UL emphasize recurring essentials in oral/home care. Growth drivers favor CL’s emerging market resilience and UL’s Power Brands, contrasting BUD’s volume softness. Recent momentum shows CL leading YTD, with BUD volatile and UL steady. Risks include BUD’s macro sensitivity, UL’s restructuring execution, and shared inflation pressures. Valuation sensitivity tilts toward UL’s lower multiples, but CL offers earnings consistency; sentiment leans positive on staples defense versus cyclicals.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CL for its trend consistency in organic growth, earnings beats, and defensive stability amid volatility. Relative positioning in consumer essentials, coupled with emerging market catalysts, suggests higher probability of outperformance versus BUD’s event reliance and UL’s transition risks, based on observable patterns in recent data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.08% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated -0.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.30% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Household/Personal Care (+0.33% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BUD | CL | UL | |
| Capitalization | 147B | 67B | 127B |
| EBITDA | 21B | 3.96B | 11.3B |
| Gain YTD | 17.192 | 7.016 | -10.700 |
| P/E Ratio | 22.14 | 31.76 | 19.01 |
| Revenue | 59.3B | 20.4B | 59.8B |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 73B | 8.55B | N/A |
BUD | CL | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 10 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 70 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 5 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 57 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 46 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UL's Valuation (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that UL's stock grew similarly to BUD’s and somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUD (75) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew significantly faster than BUD’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (66) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to BUD’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | CL | UL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 44% | 13 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 43% | 8 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 48% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UGE | 18.51 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| ProShares Ultra Consumer Staples | |||
| XLY | 119.87 | -0.54 | -0.45% |
| State Street® CnsmrDiscSelSectSPDR®ETF | |||
| SPWO | 31.10 | -0.25 | -0.80% |
| SP Funds S&P World ETF | |||
| SLTY | 26.52 | -0.26 | -0.97% |
| YieldMaxTM Ultra Short Opt Inc Strat ETF | |||
| KSA | 39.83 | -0.76 | -1.87% |
| iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | |||
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
UL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.