Advertisement
BUD or COST or PG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) vs. Costco Wholesale (COST) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BUD has demonstrated resilient performance with positive YTD gains around 6-7%, supported by premiumization strategies and digital initiatives like BEES.
- COST leads in YTD relative performance at approximately 14%, driven by strong membership dynamics and private-label expansions, though trading at elevated valuations.
- PG offers stability with a low beta of 0.34 and attractive 2.9% dividend yield, but has lagged YTD with minimal gains amid product innovation efforts.
- Over recent weeks, BUD and COST have shown stronger momentum than PG, reflecting consumer staples sector rotation toward growth-oriented names.
- Valuation contrasts highlight BUD's forward P/E near 16x as relatively attractive versus COST's 51x TTM P/E.
- All three exhibit defensive qualities, with varying exposure to volume pressures and pricing power in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison evaluates BUD, COST, and PG—key players in beverages, retail, and consumer goods—amid shifting consumer staples dynamics. These companies offer distinct profiles: BUD focuses on global brewing with premium shifts, COST leverages membership-driven wholesale efficiency, and PG dominates household essentials. Traders seeking momentum and investors prioritizing stability or dividends will find value in analyzing their recent price behavior, sentiment indicators, and relative performance in a volatile environment.
BUD Overview and Recent Performance
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD), the world's largest brewer, produces iconic brands like Budweiser and Stella Artois across global markets. In recent market activity, BUD shares have traded in the mid-60s to high-60s range, reflecting a recovery from earlier dips. Positive sentiment stems from Q4 results exceeding profit and revenue expectations, premiumization efforts, and digital platform BEES driving incremental value. Broader influences include volume stabilization and anticipation of sporting events boosting demand, contributing to YTD gains outperforming benchmarks.
COST Overview and Recent Performance
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) operates membership warehouses offering bulk goods at low margins, emphasizing private-label Kirkland products. Recent weeks have seen COST shares fluctuate around 970-980, with upward bias from robust comparable sales and e-commerce growth. Key drivers include strategic Kirkland expansions like energy drinks impacting competitors, alongside resilient membership trends despite valuation concerns. This has fueled strong YTD relative performance, outpacing broader indices amid consumer focus on value.
PG Overview and Recent Performance
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is a leading consumer goods firm with brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette spanning beauty, health, and home care. In recent trading, PG has hovered near 143, pressured by sector rotation but supported by innovation. Developments such as Dawn refill launches and premium Pampers lines test pricing power amid commodity and tariff challenges. Sentiment reflects steady dividends and low volatility (beta 0.34), though YTD gains trail peers due to softer volume dynamics.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes like 5min, 15min, and 60min. These bots employ varied approaches—signal agents for real-time copy trading without balance minimums, virtual agents with customizable risk management, and brokerage agents leveraging live accounts—tailored to current market conditions for optimal suitability. Highlighted for promising sectors, they offer performance stats and backtested results to guide users. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BUD, COST, and PG operate in consumer staples but diverge in models: BUD's brewing emphasizes premium volumes globally, COST's warehouse scale drives high-turnover essentials, and PG's branded portfolio prioritizes recurring household needs. Growth drivers include COST's membership fees (low beta 0.99) versus BUD's digital/expansion plays (beta 0.74). Recent momentum favors COST and BUD over PG (beta 0.34). Risks encompass BUD's regulatory/volume headwinds, COST's rich P/E (51x), and PG's pricing sensitivity. Valuations show BUD (forward P/E ~16x, yield 1.9%) most compelling versus PG (P/E 21x, yield 2.9%) and COST (yield 0.5%). Market sentiment tilts toward value-resilient names amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BUD due to its trend consistency, earnings beats, and attractive relative valuation positioning versus peers. With catalysts like premium growth and lower P/E, it shows probabilistic outperformance potential in staples rotation, though COST's momentum and PG's stability warrant monitoring.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- COST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +0.04% price change this week, while COST (@Discount Stores) price change was +0.14% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.51%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
COST is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.01% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Discount Stores (+2.91% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| BUD | COST | PG | |
| Capitalization | 147B | 443B | 336B |
| EBITDA | 21B | 14.1B | 24.5B |
| Gain YTD | 18.301 | 16.109 | 1.539 |
| P/E Ratio | 22.14 | 51.89 | 21.41 |
| Revenue | 59.3B | 286B | 85.3B |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | 18.2B | 10.8B |
| Total Debt | 73B | 8.17B | 36.6B |
BUD | COST | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 11 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 32 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 35 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 73 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BUD (50) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (94) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to BUD’s and somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (69) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that COST's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COST (32) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (75) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to COST’s and somewhat faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.
COST's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BUD (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that COST's stock grew similarly to BUD’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as COST (73) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as PG (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to COST’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | COST | PG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 40% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 63% | 12 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 43% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 35% |
Advertisement
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||
COST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| WMT - COST | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| BJ - COST | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| PSMT - COST | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| OLLI - COST | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| TGT - COST | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||