Advertisement
BUD or KDP or KO
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KO’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KO’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +6.21% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +4.98% , and KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.29% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.66% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| BUD | KDP | KO | |
| Capitalization | 146B | 36.1B | 333B |
| EBITDA | 21B | 4.19B | 18.7B |
| Gain YTD | 18.254 | -3.511 | 11.576 |
| P/E Ratio | 22.34 | 17.37 | 25.48 |
| Revenue | 59.3B | 16.6B | 47.9B |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 73B | 17.6B | 45.5B |
BUD | KDP | KO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 65 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 25 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 74 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 61 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 94 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as BUD (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to KO’s and similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (67) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KO's stock grew somewhat faster than BUD’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BUD (75) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that KO's stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s and somewhat faster than BUD’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUD (45) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to BUD’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that BUD's stock grew similarly to KO’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | KDP | KO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 33% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 36% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 49% | 3 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 54% | 10 days ago 45% | 23 days ago 29% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 5 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 27% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 23% |
Advertisement
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| ABEV - BUD | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
KDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| KO - KDP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.