BWXT
Price
$221.91
Change
-$6.34 (-2.78%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:46 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.91B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HII
Price
$383.49
Change
-$8.70 (-2.22%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:25 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.44B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOC
Price
$620.00
Change
-$36.98 (-5.63%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.31B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWXT or HII or NOC

Header iconBWXT vs HII vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts BWXT vs HII vs NOCBanner chart's image
BWXT vs HII vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? BWX Technologies (BWXT) vs. Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BWXT delivered strong Q4 2025 earnings with EPS of $1.08 beating estimates, record backlog of $7.3B, and 2026 guidance signaling high-teens revenue growth driven by naval nuclear and commercial segments.
  • HII leads in 1-year performance at +125%, supported by shipbuilding advancements like the USS Philadelphia keel authentication and unmanned naval initiatives amid robust defense demand.
  • NOC boasts the largest market cap at $108B and YTD gains of 33%, bolstered by a record $96B backlog, $225M E-130J contract, and broad exposure across aeronautics, defense, and space.
  • All three stocks in the defense sector show low betas (0.01-0.81), indicating relative stability, with dividends yielding 0.52%-1.31% and PE ratios reflecting growth premiums (26-55x).
  • Recent market activity highlights supply chain pressures like rare earth materials, yet contract wins and geopolitical tensions sustain positive sentiment across BWXT, HII, and NOC.
  • Year-to-date, NOC outperforms at +33%, followed by HII (+27%) and BWXT (+13%), amid rising U.S. defense spending.

Introduction

BWX Technologies (BWXT), Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), and Northrop Grumman (NOC) are key players in the aerospace and defense sector, specializing in nuclear components, shipbuilding, and advanced systems respectively. This comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning amid heightened geopolitical tensions and sustained U.S. defense budgets. Traders seeking momentum in defense-related equities and long-term investors focused on backlog visibility and sector tailwinds will find these insights valuable for evaluating relative performance and stock comparison opportunities.

BWXT Overview and Recent Performance

BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) is a leading supplier of nuclear components, fuel, and services, primarily serving U.S. naval propulsion programs and commercial nuclear power. With over 350 naval reactors produced since the 1950s, it holds a sole-source position in critical defense applications. In recent market activity, BWXT shares traded around $195, with a 52-week range of $84-$221 and market cap near $18B. The stock has gained 13% YTD and 96% over one year, reflecting strong momentum. Q4 2025 results showed EPS of $1.08 beating estimates by 22%, revenue up 19% to $886M, and a record $7.3B backlog up 50% YoY, fueled by multi-year naval and commercial awards. 2026 guidance projects $3.75B revenue and EPS of $4.55-$4.70, supported by acquisitions and commercial nuclear growth. Sentiment remains positive despite rare earth supply concerns, with low beta (0.81) underscoring stability.

HII Overview and Recent Performance

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) designs, builds, and maintains U.S. Navy ships, including nuclear-powered carriers and submarines, alongside non-nuclear vessels and mission technologies. As the largest military shipbuilder, it operates via Ingalls, Newport News, and Mission Technologies divisions. Shares recently hovered at $429, within a 52-week range of $177-$460, with a $17B market cap. Performance stands out at 27% YTD and 125% over one year, driven by shipbuilding demand. Recent quarters featured Q4 EPS of $4.04 topping estimates, with advancements like the USS Philadelphia (LPD 32) keel authentication and unmanned naval pushes enhancing visibility. A $45B+ backlog supports steady execution amid labor and supply challenges. Low beta (0.28) and 1.31% yield bolster appeal, though rare earth constraints pose risks. Investor sentiment favors HII's maritime focus in recent weeks.

NOC Overview and Recent Performance

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) delivers aerospace and defense technologies across aeronautics, defense systems, mission systems, and space, with key programs in stealth bombers, missiles, and satellites. Operating globally, it serves U.S. government and international clients. Shares traded near $756, in a 52-week range of $450-$774, boasting a $108B market cap. YTD gains of 33% and 62% one-year returns lead peers, reflecting broad sector exposure. Recent highlights include a record $96B backlog and $225M E-130J contract, with Q4 EPS of $7.23 surpassing forecasts. Geopolitical tensions and production ramps, including Trump administration comments on output boosts, have lifted sentiment. Beta near 0.01 signals exceptional stability, complemented by 1.25% yield, though supply chain issues like rare earths persist. Strong contract flow sustains relative outperformance.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each scanning thousands of tickers for real-time opportunities based on technical and fundamental analyses. Only those excelling in current volatility, momentum, and sector rotations earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to +220%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. Bots vary by style—scalping on 5-15min frames, swing trading over days—or focus, such as aerospace & defense agents yielding +32% to +100% annualized (e.g., AeroDefense ITA at 80% win rate). Multi-sector bots blend energy, semis, and industrials for diversified edges. Explore these adaptable tools tailored to today’s market and consider subscribing for automated signals.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BWXT, HII, and NOC share defense exposure but diverge in models: BWXT’s niche nuclear focus offers high margins (PE 55x) and growth via commercial diversification, contrasting HII’s shipbuilding cycle sensitivity (PE 28x, highest momentum). NOC balances scale (PE 26x) across diversified segments. Growth drivers include naval propulsion for BWXT/HII and space/missiles for NOC, with backlogs ($7B-$96B) ensuring visibility. Risks encompass supply squeezes and program delays, yet low betas mitigate volatility. Valuation sensitivity rises with BWXT’s premium; sentiment favors all amid rearmament, but HII trades richest relative to peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors NOC for its unmatched backlog scale, diversified catalysts across segments, trend consistency, and leading YTD positioning, offering probabilistic stability in volatile defense markets. HII trails closely on momentum, while BWXT appeals for nuclear upside.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (BWXT: $228.24HII: $392.19NOC: $656.98)
Brand notoriety: BWXT and HII are not notable and NOC is notable
The three companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWXT: 89%, HII: 59%, NOC: 115%
Market capitalization -- BWXT: $20.91B, HII: $15.44B, NOC: $93.31B
$BWXT is valued at $20.91B, while HII has a market capitalization of $15.44B, and NOC's market capitalization is $93.31B. The market cap for tickers in this @Aerospace & Defense ranges from $317.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Aerospace & Defense industry is $23.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWXT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHII’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NOC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWXT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HII’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HII is a better buy in the long-term than BWXT, which in turn is a better option than NOC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWXT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NOC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWXT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWXT is a better buy in the short-term than NOC, which in turn is a better option than HII.

Price Growth

BWXT (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while HII (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -0.58% , and NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +5.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWXT is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.

HII is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+5.37% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOC($93.3B) has a higher market cap than BWXT($20.9B) and HII($15.4B). BWXT has higher P/E ratio than HII and NOC: BWXT (63.75) vs HII (25.48) and NOC (22.59). BWXT YTD gains are higher at: 32.235 vs. HII (15.687) and NOC (15.586). NOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.21B vs. HII (1.21B) and BWXT (552M). BWXT has less debt than HII and NOC: BWXT (2.02B) vs HII (2.92B) and NOC (17B). NOC has higher revenues than HII and BWXT: NOC (42B) vs HII (12.5B) and BWXT (3.2B).
BWXTHIINOC
Capitalization20.9B15.4B93.3B
EBITDA552M1.21B7.21B
Gain YTD32.23515.68715.586
P/E Ratio63.7525.4822.59
Revenue3.2B12.5B42B
Total CashN/A774M4.4B
Total Debt2.02B2.92B17B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWXT vs HII vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
BWXT
HII
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
165652
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83010
SMR RATING
1..100
336035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
404655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
142144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HII's Valuation (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (58) and is significantly better than the same rating for BWXT (95). This means that HII's stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s and significantly faster than BWXT’s over the last 12 months.

BWXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (10) and is in the same range as HII (30). This means that BWXT's stock grew similarly to NOC’s and similarly to HII’s over the last 12 months.

BWXT's SMR Rating (33) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (35) and is in the same range as HII (60). This means that BWXT's stock grew similarly to NOC’s and similarly to HII’s over the last 12 months.

BWXT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HII (46) and is in the same range as NOC (55). This means that BWXT's stock grew similarly to HII’s and similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

BWXT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HII (21) and is in the same range as NOC (44). This means that BWXT's stock grew similarly to HII’s and similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWXTHIINOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWJ55.310.41
+0.75%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
NOVM33.310.19
+0.59%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF – Nov
BSMQ23.58N/A
+0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Muncpl Bd ETF
BETZ19.44-0.05
-0.24%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
IMVP22.06-0.40
-1.78%
Invesco India ETF

NOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOC
1D Price
Change %
NOC100%
-1.24%
RTX - NOC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
LHX - NOC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
GD - NOC
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
HII - NOC
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
LMT - NOC
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More