BZH
Price
$23.33
Change
-$1.83 (-7.27%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
687.72M
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHM
Price
$114.55
Change
-$0.90 (-0.78%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.99B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMHC
Price
$58.24
Change
-$1.06 (-1.79%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.54B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZH or PHM or TMHC

Header iconBZH vs PHM vs TMHC Comparison
Open Charts BZH vs PHM vs TMHCBanner chart's image
BZH vs PHM vs TMHC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Beazer Homes USA (BZH) vs. PulteGroup (PHM) vs. Taylor Morrison Home (TMHC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • PHM leads with the largest market capitalization at approximately $22 billion and strong analyst outperform ratings, offering scale advantages in a tough housing market.
  • BZH posts the strongest year-to-date return of over 11%, but its smaller $510 million market cap heightens volatility amid recent earnings volatility.
  • TMHC trades at the lowest trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.87, positioning it as a potential value play despite revenue pressures.
  • All three stocks have faced downward pressure from elevated mortgage rates, with homebuilders increasing incentives to around 10-11% of sales prices in recent quarters.
  • Recent quarterly earnings showed earnings beats or narrower losses but year-over-year revenue declines, reflecting a shift toward build-to-order strategies.
  • Sector sentiment hinges on potential interest rate relief, with relative performance favoring larger players like PHM for stability.

Introduction

Beazer Homes USA (BZH), PulteGroup (PHM), and Taylor Morrison Home (TMHC) are prominent players in the U.S. residential homebuilding sector, focusing on single-family homes amid persistent high interest rates and affordability challenges. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and operational dynamics. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term housing recovery will find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as scale, valuation, and sensitivity to mortgage rate fluctuations. With the sector navigating incentive-heavy sales and build-to-order shifts, these insights highlight key trade-offs in the current environment.

BZH Overview and Recent Performance

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) designs, constructs, and sells single-family and multi-family homes primarily in the South and West U.S., targeting entry-level and move-up buyers. In recent market activity, BZH shares have exhibited heightened volatility, trading around $18 with a 52-week range of $17.89 to $28.33. Year-to-date gains exceed 11%, outperforming peers, but recent weeks saw sharp declines following fiscal Q2 2026 earnings. The company reported a narrower-than-expected loss of $0.03 per share, though revenue lagged estimates amid softening demand. Sentiment has been influenced by rising buyer incentives and cost-reduction efforts, like $3,000 per home savings, as high mortgage rates pressure affordability and backlog conversion.

PHM Overview and Recent Performance

PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM), one of the largest U.S. homebuilders, operates diverse brands offering homes from entry-level to luxury across multiple regions. Shares recently hovered near $115, within a 52-week range of $95.20 to $144.50, reflecting relative stability with a market cap nearing $22 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at about 1.3%, trailing broader indices amid sector headwinds. In recent quarters, Q1 CY2026 sales met expectations but fell 12.4% year-over-year to $3.41 billion, with incentives climbing to 10.9% of sales prices. Analyst sentiment remains positive, with multiple outperform ratings and price targets up to $151, buoyed by the company's scale and shift to build-to-order models reducing inventory risks.

TMHC Overview and Recent Performance

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) builds single-family attached and detached homes for first-time, move-up, and custom buyers, with a focus on quality communities nationwide. Trading around $59.50 in a 52-week range of $54.58 to $72.50, the stock has shown resilience with year-to-date gains of roughly 1%. Recent earnings for Q1 CY2026 beat revenue forecasts despite a 26.8% sales drop, driven by higher incentives and a strategic pivot to spec-light inventory. Market sentiment reflects value appeal via a low trailing P/E of 8.87, though shares dipped amid broader sector pressures from elevated rates. Analysts maintain strong buy ratings, citing expansion plans and operational efficiency.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in varying market conditions. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70 across strategies like trend-following, short-term scalping, and sector rotation (e.g., semiconductors, industrials). Timeframes range from hours to 49 days, with strong profit-to-drawdown ratios emphasizing risk management. Ideal for today's volatile environment, they adapt to inflation, rates, and growth sectors. Traders can explore these high-performing bots to enhance strategies across stocks like homebuilders.

Head-to-Head Comparison

All three operate similar business models in single-family homebuilding, heavily exposed to interest rate sensitivity and housing demand cycles. PHM differentiates via massive scale and brand diversity, supporting larger backlogs and resilience, while smaller BZH faces higher beta risks but quicker pivots. Growth drivers include potential rate cuts boosting affordability, though current trends favor build-to-order over spec homes to combat rising incentives. Recent momentum favors BZH's YTD surge, but TMHC offers valuation edge with the lowest P/E and forward multiples around 12.85. Risk factors are uniform—margin compression from incentives—but PHM mitigates via efficiency. Market sentiment leans toward larger caps for stability amid uncertain sector recovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models would likely favor PHM in the current landscape, given its superior scale, consistent analyst outperform consensus, and balanced valuation at a trailing P/E of 11.17. Relative positioning shows greater trend stability and lower drawdown potential compared to volatile BZH or incentive-burdened TMHC. Catalysts like dividend growth and buybacks add appeal, though all benefit from housing rebound probabilities.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (BZH: $25.16PHM: $115.45TMHC: $59.30)
Brand notoriety: BZH and TMHC are not notable and PHM is notable
The three companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZH: 1033%, PHM: 71%, TMHC: 99%
Market capitalization -- BZH: $687.72M, PHM: $21.99B, TMHC: $5.54B
$BZH is valued at $687.72M, while PHM has a market capitalization of $21.99B, and TMHC's market capitalization is $5.54B. The market cap for tickers in this @Homebuilding ranges from $41.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Homebuilding industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TMHC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHM and TMHC are a better buy in the long-term than BZH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TMHC’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TMHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZH is a better buy in the short-term than PHM, which in turn is a better option than TMHC.

Price Growth

BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +39.55% price change this week, while PHM (@Homebuilding) price change was +0.26% , and TMHC (@Homebuilding) price fluctuated +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PHM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

TMHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (-0.03% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHM($22B) has a higher market cap than TMHC($5.54B) and BZH($688M). BZH has higher P/E ratio than PHM and TMHC: BZH (74.45) vs PHM (11.17) and TMHC (8.84). BZH YTD gains are higher at: 24.124 vs. TMHC (0.730) and PHM (-1.334). PHM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.79B vs. TMHC (1.03B) and BZH (-11.12M). PHM has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. TMHC (653M) and BZH (116M). BZH has less debt than PHM and TMHC: BZH (1.25B) vs PHM (2.28B) and TMHC (2.42B). PHM has higher revenues than TMHC and BZH: PHM (16.8B) vs TMHC (7.61B) and BZH (2.11B).
BZHPHMTMHC
Capitalization688M22B5.54B
EBITDA-11.12M2.79B1.03B
Gain YTD24.124-1.3340.730
P/E Ratio74.4511.178.84
Revenue2.11B16.8B7.61B
Total Cash116M2.32B653M
Total Debt1.25B2.28B2.42B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZH vs PHM vs TMHC: Fundamental Ratings
BZH
PHM
TMHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
191360
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
844440
SMR RATING
1..100
905266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
835958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11827
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMHC's Valuation (67) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (76) and is in the same range as BZH (98). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (44) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (84). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.

PHM's SMR Rating (52) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TMHC (66) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (90). This means that PHM's stock grew similarly to TMHC’s and somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (59) and is in the same range as BZH (83). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.

BZH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (18) and is in the same range as TMHC (27). This means that BZH's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZHPHMTMHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAA30.300.16
+0.53%
SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF
ITDF40.830.02
+0.04%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF
ZTR6.70-0.04
-0.59%
Virtus Total Return Fund
AVL61.13-0.50
-0.81%
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
FLIN34.72-0.95
-2.66%
Franklin FTSE India ETF

BZH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZH
1D Price
Change %
BZH100%
+34.04%
PHM - BZH
77%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
MTH - BZH
77%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
TMHC - BZH
77%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
KBH - BZH
77%
Closely correlated
-3.33%
MHO - BZH
76%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
More

PHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHM has been closely correlated with DHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHM jumps, then DHI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHM
1D Price
Change %
PHM100%
-1.79%
DHI - PHM
93%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
TOL - PHM
91%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
MTH - PHM
90%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
KBH - PHM
90%
Closely correlated
-3.33%
TMHC - PHM
88%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
More

TMHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMHC
1D Price
Change %
TMHC100%
-1.17%
MTH - TMHC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
PHM - TMHC
89%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
MHO - TMHC
88%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
KBH - TMHC
88%
Closely correlated
-3.33%
GRBK - TMHC
87%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
More