Beazer Homes USA (BZH), PulteGroup (PHM), and Taylor Morrison Home (TMHC) are prominent players in the U.S. residential homebuilding sector, focusing on single-family homes amid persistent high interest rates and affordability challenges. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and operational dynamics. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term housing recovery will find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as scale, valuation, and sensitivity to mortgage rate fluctuations. With the sector navigating incentive-heavy sales and build-to-order shifts, these insights highlight key trade-offs in the current environment.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) designs, constructs, and sells single-family and multi-family homes primarily in the South and West U.S., targeting entry-level and move-up buyers. In recent market activity, BZH shares have exhibited heightened volatility, trading around $18 with a 52-week range of $17.89 to $28.33. Year-to-date gains exceed 11%, outperforming peers, but recent weeks saw sharp declines following fiscal Q2 2026 earnings. The company reported a narrower-than-expected loss of $0.03 per share, though revenue lagged estimates amid softening demand. Sentiment has been influenced by rising buyer incentives and cost-reduction efforts, like $3,000 per home savings, as high mortgage rates pressure affordability and backlog conversion.
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM), one of the largest U.S. homebuilders, operates diverse brands offering homes from entry-level to luxury across multiple regions. Shares recently hovered near $115, within a 52-week range of $95.20 to $144.50, reflecting relative stability with a market cap nearing $22 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at about 1.3%, trailing broader indices amid sector headwinds. In recent quarters, Q1 CY2026 sales met expectations but fell 12.4% year-over-year to $3.41 billion, with incentives climbing to 10.9% of sales prices. Analyst sentiment remains positive, with multiple outperform ratings and price targets up to $151, buoyed by the company's scale and shift to build-to-order models reducing inventory risks.
Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) builds single-family attached and detached homes for first-time, move-up, and custom buyers, with a focus on quality communities nationwide. Trading around $59.50 in a 52-week range of $54.58 to $72.50, the stock has shown resilience with year-to-date gains of roughly 1%. Recent earnings for Q1 CY2026 beat revenue forecasts despite a 26.8% sales drop, driven by higher incentives and a strategic pivot to spec-light inventory. Market sentiment reflects value appeal via a low trailing P/E of 8.87, though shares dipped amid broader sector pressures from elevated rates. Analysts maintain strong buy ratings, citing expansion plans and operational efficiency.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in varying market conditions. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70 across strategies like trend-following, short-term scalping, and sector rotation (e.g., semiconductors, industrials). Timeframes range from hours to 49 days, with strong profit-to-drawdown ratios emphasizing risk management. Ideal for today's volatile environment, they adapt to inflation, rates, and growth sectors. Traders can explore these high-performing bots to enhance strategies across stocks like homebuilders.
All three operate similar business models in single-family homebuilding, heavily exposed to interest rate sensitivity and housing demand cycles. PHM differentiates via massive scale and brand diversity, supporting larger backlogs and resilience, while smaller BZH faces higher beta risks but quicker pivots. Growth drivers include potential rate cuts boosting affordability, though current trends favor build-to-order over spec homes to combat rising incentives. Recent momentum favors BZH's YTD surge, but TMHC offers valuation edge with the lowest P/E and forward multiples around 12.85. Risk factors are uniform—margin compression from incentives—but PHM mitigates via efficiency. Market sentiment leans toward larger caps for stability amid uncertain sector recovery.
Tickeron's AI models would likely favor PHM in the current landscape, given its superior scale, consistent analyst outperform consensus, and balanced valuation at a trailing P/E of 11.17. Relative positioning shows greater trend stability and lower drawdown potential compared to volatile BZH or incentive-burdened TMHC. Catalysts like dividend growth and buybacks add appeal, though all benefit from housing rebound probabilities.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TMHC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TMHC’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BZH (@Homebuilding) experienced а +39.55% price change this week, while PHM (@Homebuilding) price change was +0.26% , and TMHC (@Homebuilding) price fluctuated +1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.69%.
BZH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PHM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
TMHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| BZH | PHM | TMHC | |
| Capitalization | 688M | 22B | 5.54B |
| EBITDA | -11.12M | 2.79B | 1.03B |
| Gain YTD | 24.124 | -1.334 | 0.730 |
| P/E Ratio | 74.45 | 11.17 | 8.84 |
| Revenue | 2.11B | 16.8B | 7.61B |
| Total Cash | 116M | 2.32B | 653M |
| Total Debt | 1.25B | 2.28B | 2.42B |
BZH | PHM | TMHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 13 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 44 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 52 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 59 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 18 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMHC's Valuation (67) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (76) and is in the same range as BZH (98). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (44) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (84). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's SMR Rating (52) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TMHC (66) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BZH (90). This means that PHM's stock grew similarly to TMHC’s and somewhat faster than BZH’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (59) and is in the same range as BZH (83). This means that TMHC's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to BZH’s over the last 12 months.
BZH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (18) and is in the same range as TMHC (27). This means that BZH's stock grew similarly to PHM’s and similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.
| BZH | PHM | TMHC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 59% | 9 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZH has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BZH jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHM has been closely correlated with DHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHM jumps, then DHI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMHC | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| MTH - TMHC | 90% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| PHM - TMHC | 89% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MHO - TMHC | 88% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| KBH - TMHC | 88% Closely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| GRBK - TMHC | 87% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
More | ||||