Advertisement
C or FNB or KEY
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citigroup (C) vs. F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) vs. KeyCorp (KEY) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- C has delivered the strongest one-year performance at over 50% gains, trading around $113-114 amid recent volatility, supported by global diversification.
- FNB and KEY show regional stability with 18-22% one-year returns, but both experienced sharper recent declines, hovering near $16 and $19-20 respectively.
- All three faced pressure in recent weeks from sector-wide sentiment, with C down about 5% over the past month versus steeper drops for FNB (7-9%) and KEY (10%).
- Analyst targets suggest upside: C at $124+, implying 9-10% potential, while regional peers offer value plays amid balance sheet growth.
- Recent earnings beats across the board highlight resilient net interest income, though provisions and market conditions weigh on momentum.
- Diversified C contrasts with focused regional models of FNB and KEY, influencing risk-reward profiles.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines C, a global banking giant, alongside regional players FNB and KEY, all operating in the financial services sector. Traders seeking momentum in large-cap names and investors eyeing value in mid-tier banks will find value here, particularly amid recent market volatility and interest rate dynamics. By analyzing recent performance, business models, and relative positioning, this review highlights contrasts in scale, growth drivers, and sensitivity to economic shifts, aiding decisions on relative performance and market positioning in today's environment.
C Overview and Recent Performance
Citigroup (C), a diversified global financial services leader with operations in over 160 countries, focuses on institutional clients, personal banking, wealth management, and markets. Its business model leverages a vast network for treasury solutions, investment banking, and consumer products. In recent market activity, C shares traded around $113-114, reflecting volatility with a roughly 5% pullback over the past month from highs near $117-125. Sentiment has been influenced by broader banking sector pressures, offset by strong analyst ratings averaging "Buy" with targets around $124. Key drivers include resilient interest income, Q4 earnings beats, and strategic simplification into five core businesses, though geopolitical risks and rate expectations have capped upside. Year-to-date and one-year gains exceed 50%, underscoring long-term momentum.
FNB Overview and Recent Performance
F.N.B. Corporation (FNB), headquartered in Pittsburgh, operates as a diversified regional bank across seven states and D.C., offering commercial, consumer banking, and wealth management via about 350 branches and $50 billion in assets. Its model emphasizes relationship banking, digital innovation like the eStore, and balanced loan growth. Recent weeks saw FNB shares near $16.50, down 7-9% monthly from peaks around $18-19, amid sector headwinds. Performance reflects Q4 earnings beats with $0.50 non-GAAP EPS and mid-single-digit loan/deposit growth guidance, boosting tangible book value 13% year-over-year. Sentiment ties to regional economic strength and fee-based revenue records, though share repurchases and provisions temper gains. One-year returns near 22% highlight steady positioning.
KEY Overview and Recent Performance
KeyCorp (KEY), based in Cleveland, provides retail, commercial banking, investment services, and capital markets across the U.S., with a focus on middle-market clients and organic growth. Its model balances consumer lending, deposits, and institutional solutions. In recent trading, KEY hovered around $19-20, marking a 10% monthly decline from $22+ highs, driven by market sentiment. Q4 results showed net income of $474 million ($0.43/share), beating estimates on higher interest income, alongside a $1.2 billion buyback and 7-10% NII growth outlook for 2026. Analyst consensus points to $23 targets. Influences include robust loan momentum and dividend hikes, countered by deposit cost pressures. One-year gains approach 26%, with YTD softness.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ advanced financial learning models for price action, patterns, and risk management, with standout performers posting 30-day annualized returns up to 171%, win rates of 88-100%, and profits like $69,000+ on model portfolios. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents at 112-236% annualized and multi-ticker systems exceeding 200% in select sectors. Only the most suitable for current volatility—balancing growth, defense, and tech—earn trending status. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your stock comparison analysis.
Head-to-Head Comparison
C’s global scale and institutional focus provide diversification against regional cycles, contrasting FNB and KEY’s community-oriented models with concentrated U.S. exposure. Growth drivers differ: C benefits from cross-border markets and IB fees, while peers leverage loan expansion (mid-single digits for FNB, robust for KEY). Recent momentum favors C’s 50%+ yearly surge over 20% for regionals, but all dipped in recent weeks amid rate uncertainty. Risk factors include C’s geopolitical sensitivity versus locals’ CRE exposure. Valuation-wise, regionals trade at discounts with stronger buybacks, while C offers premium stability. Sentiment tilts positive on earnings resilience across the board.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors C for its superior trend consistency, global catalysts like simplification and high analyst conviction, and relative stability amid volatility. With stronger one-year positioning and probabilistic upside to $124 targets, it edges regional peers showing sharper recent drawdowns despite value appeal. This assessment reflects observable momentum and lower relative risk, though monitoring sector shifts remains key.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
C’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFNB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KEY’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- C’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- FNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
C’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and KEY’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- C’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
C (@Major Banks) experienced а +7.93% price change this week, while FNB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.92% , and KEY (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +4.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
C is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.
FNB is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
KEY is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+4.00% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
@Regional Banks (+2.59% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| C | FNB | KEY | |
| Capitalization | 213B | 6.32B | 23B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 7.154 | 4.186 | 5.002 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.80 | 11.34 | 14.12 |
| Revenue | 85.2B | 1.77B | 7.29B |
| Total Cash | 23.5B | 387M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 368B | 3.08B | 11B |
C | FNB | KEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 27 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 41 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 11 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 44 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 39 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FNB's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as C (80) in the Financial Conglomerates industry, and is in the same range as KEY (80) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNB's stock grew similarly to C’s and similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.
C's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FNB (41) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KEY (75) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to FNB’s and somewhat faster than KEY’s over the last 12 months.
C's SMR Rating (2) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as KEY (8) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as FNB (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to KEY’s and similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.
C's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as KEY (18) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to KEY’s and somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.
C's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FNB (39) in the Regional Banks industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KEY (89) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C's stock grew similarly to FNB’s and significantly faster than KEY’s over the last 12 months.
| C | FNB | KEY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 68% | 13 days ago 58% | 13 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMLG | 32.84 | 0.09 | +0.27% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
| BCD | 35.74 | 0.08 | +0.22% |
| abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF | |||
| PXF | 73.09 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF | |||
| SMAX | 27.10 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | |||
| PSQA | 20.47 | -0.05 | -0.22% |
| Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF | |||
C and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
FNB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNB | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| ASB - FNB | 93% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ONB - FNB | 92% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CFG - FNB | 92% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| WTFC - FNB | 92% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| ZION - FNB | 91% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
More | ||||
KEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEY has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KEY jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.