Advertisement
CCEP or KO or MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP reported strong Q1 2026 results with revenue up 6.7% to €5.0 billion and reaffirmed full-year guidance of 3-4% revenue growth.
- KO delivered Q1 2026 revenue of $12.47 billion, up 12%, with comparable EPS (earnings per share) rising 18% to $0.86, boosting shares post-earnings.
- MNST awaits Q1 2026 earnings on May 7, following robust FY2025 growth, with analysts forecasting EPS of $0.53 and revenue around $2.16 billion.
- KO offers a dividend yield of approximately 2.7%, higher than CCEP's 2.5-3%, while MNST pays none, highlighting stability versus growth profiles.
- Year-to-date, KO has outperformed with gains around 8-11%, compared to modest CCEP and MNST returns amid sector rotation.
- P/E ratios position CCEP at ~19 and KO similarly attractive for value, while MNST trades at a premium reflecting energy drink momentum.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CCEP, KO, and MNST, all key players in the beverage sector spanning non-alcoholic soft drinks and energy categories. Investors seeking exposure to consumer staples with defensive qualities or growth-oriented energy beverages will find value here. Recent market activity, including Q1 earnings and shifting consumer preferences toward healthier or premium options, underscores relative performance differences. Traders monitoring momentum, dividends, and valuation sensitivity in a volatile environment can use this analysis for informed positioning in stock comparison and market positioning strategies.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) operates as an independent bottler for KO products across Europe, Asia-Pacific, and select regions, focusing on production, distribution, and sales. In recent weeks, CCEP shares have shown resilience amid broader market fluctuations, trading around $96-98. Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue growth of 6.7% to €5.0 billion, with Europe up 9.1% and Asia-Pacific & South (APS) up 1.1% reported, or 8.6% on a foreign exchange-neutral basis. Organic volume expanded 8.5%, driven by strategic pricing and volume gains, leading to reaffirmed FY2026 guidance of 3-4% revenue growth and ~7% operating profit increase. Positive sentiment stems from market share gains and operational efficiencies, though currency headwinds in APS tempered gains. Dividend yield hovers at 2.5-3%, appealing to income investors.
KO Overview and Recent Performance
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the global franchisor of iconic beverages, licensing brands to bottlers like CCEP while managing concentrate operations and marketing. Recent market activity saw KO shares rise about 4% following Q1 2026 earnings, reflecting ongoing uptrend with YTD gains near 11%. Net revenue climbed 12% to $12.47 billion, with comparable EPS up 18% to $0.86, fueled by 2% sparkling soft drink volume growth, including 13% for Coca-Cola Zero Sugar. The company updated full-year guidance positively, supported by strong Asia Pacific and North America performance. Sentiment benefits from brand strength, dividend consistency (yield ~2.7%), and resilience in economic uncertainty, though slower volume in some categories pressured pricing dynamics.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks, leveraging the Monster Energy brand alongside alcoholic beverages like The Beast Unleashed. Shares trade near $77, with recent weeks showing stability ahead of Q1 2026 earnings due May 7. Analysts anticipate EPS of $0.53 and revenue of ~$2.16 billion, building on FY2025's 10.7% sales growth to $8.29 billion. Performance reflects robust energy sector demand, though insider sales and broader consumer health trends introduce caution. No dividend policy emphasizes reinvestment for growth, contrasting peers. Recent momentum lags YTD peers amid rotation from high-growth names, with valuation premium tied to market share in a $60-70 billion energy drink market expanding 7-10% annually.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—such as those targeting semiconductors (+163% annualized returns), data centers, space stocks, industrials, small caps, leveraged ETFs (win rates up to 88%), and gold miners—earn a spot among the 25 trending bots. Stats highlight profit factors over 7, low drawdowns, and short-to-long trade durations, enabling copy trading with risk management. These bots adapt to relative performance shifts, offering traders data-driven edges without emotional bias. Explore the Trending AI Robots for potential alignment with beverage sector plays like CCEP, KO, or MNST.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP and KO share deep ties in the Coca-Cola ecosystem—CCEP as regional bottler emphasizes execution in Europe/APS, while KO drives global branding and innovation. MNST differentiates via energy drinks, capturing premium growth but exposing to health trend risks absent in peers' stable soft drinks. Recent momentum favors KO (YTD ~11%) over MNST (~0.25%), with CCEP steady at ~3%. Valuation sensitivity shows CCEP and KO P/E ~19 with dividends (2.5-2.7%), versus MNST's growth premium and zero yield. Risk factors include FX/currency for CCEP, tax disputes for KO, and competition for MNST. Sector exposure blends consumer staples defense with discretionary energy upside, trading stability for potential catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward KO for its trend consistency, recent earnings beat, updated guidance, and superior relative positioning with dividend support. While CCEP shows solid regional growth and MNST offers upside post-earnings, KO's global scale and stability provide higher probability of outperformance in the near term amid economic uncertainty.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MNST’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and MNST’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.98% , and MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +13.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1565.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.08% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | KO | MNST | |
| Capitalization | 40.9B | 344B | 84B |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 19.2B | 2.71B |
| Gain YTD | 2.448 | 15.263 | 11.999 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.54 | 25.17 | 41.48 |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 49.3B | 8.79B |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 13.8B | 2.99B |
| Total Debt | 12B | 43.9B | 199M |
CCEP | KO | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 63 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 45 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 12 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 21 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 51 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 62 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as KO (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP's stock grew similarly to KO’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (18) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as CCEP (24) in the null industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (58) in the null industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to KO’s and somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as CCEP (78) in the null industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to KO’s and similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | KO | MNST | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 51% | 7 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 37% | 5 days ago 30% | 28 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CARD | 2.96 | 0.09 | +3.32% |
| Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN | |||
| USAI | 46.61 | 0.62 | +1.35% |
| Pacer American Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| PSQ | 26.36 | 0.23 | +0.88% |
| ProShares Short QQQ | |||
| XLSI | 23.57 | 0.13 | +0.57% |
| State Street®CnsmrStpSelSectSPDR®PrmETF | |||
| CGBL | 37.28 | -0.07 | -0.19% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| KO - CCEP | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| KOF - CCEP | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||